Court Dispute dates back to 2005.<\/p>\n
A federal judge has approved an agreement between the state and a coalition of free speech plaintiffs in a long-running lawsuit, ensuring those who post adult content on the Internet cant be prosecuted for failing to label it as \"harmful to minors.\" <\/p>\n
U.S. District Judge Dee Benson approved the agreement earlier this week in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, local artist Nathan Florence, trade associations, publishers of graphic and comic books and librarians who all argued the law infringed on free speech rights. <\/p>\n
Bensons order states adults dont need to label content they post as harmful to minors. The law does allow prosecution of those who intentionally send material deemed harmful to minors to a specific minor or someone whose age hasnt been determined. <\/p>\n
The outcome marked a win for First Amendment rights, said plaintiffs attorneys. <\/p>\n
\"This declaratory judgment makes clear that adult-to-adult communications on the Internet, and through other electronic means, cannot be restricted simply because minors also access the Internet and other electronic communications,\" said David Horowitz, executive director of Media Coalition, an organization that represents the trade associations of booksellers, publishers, graphic and comic books, and librarians. <\/p>\n
Assistant Attorney General Jerrold Jensen said the harmful to minors statute remains the same, and that it had only been misinterpreted by the plaintiffs. <\/p>\n
\"It does not apply universally, it has to be a one-on-one encounter,\" Jensen said Friday. \"That was our position from day one.\" <\/p>\n
In 2005, the ACLU filed a lawsuit arguing the wording of the law violated the First Amendment for adults by making it illegal for adult-to-adult communications on the Internet on the basis that a minor might access the website or blog. <\/p>\n
In 2007 the statute was amended, but the plaintiffs argued it still barred certain forms of visual art, photography and graphic novels, without posting it would be harmful to minors. It also didnt allow for information about human sexuality and the health rights of the LGBT community, according to the lawsuit. In response, the law was amended again in 2008. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
See the article here: Court Dispute dates back to 2005. A federal judge has approved an agreement between the state and a coalition of free speech plaintiffs in a long-running lawsuit, ensuring those who post adult content on the Internet cant be prosecuted for failing to label it as \"harmful to minors.\" U.S. District Judge Dee Benson approved the agreement earlier this week in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, local artist Nathan Florence, trade associations, publishers of graphic and comic books and librarians who all argued the law infringed on free speech rights Continue reading
\nJudge overturns free speech law after ACLU suit<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"