Privacy advocates are pushing to allow Minnesota voters to decide whether their electronic communication should be protected from unreasonable search and seizure. <\/p>\n
A bipartisan group of lawmakers and political organizations is encouraging the Legislature to put the question on the 2016 ballot. <\/p>\n
State Rep. Peggy Scott, R-Andover, worries that law enforcement is overstepping its authority in acquiring data like financial and telecommunications records without getting search warrants. <\/p>\n
\"If data was what it is today if it would have been that way back when the constitution was being written I believe they would have included a person's technological communications as part of those things that would have been protected by the Fourth Amendment,\" Scott said. <\/p>\n
A committee in the Republican-controlled House has scheduled a hearing on the bill this week. No committee hearing is scheduled in the Senate and DFL Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk said he's reluctant to put any measures on the ballot next year. <\/p>\n
\"I think it would be unlikely that we're going to consider something additional for the ballot in 2016,\" Bakk said. \"It's a conversation that I haven't had with the speaker yet if they have any interest to propose something.\" <\/p>\n
Privacy issues are a major theme at the Capitol this year. There are also discussions about the privacy implications of police body cameras and police use of license plate readers. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to read the rest: Privacy advocates are pushing to allow Minnesota voters to decide whether their electronic communication should be protected from unreasonable search and seizure. A bipartisan group of lawmakers and political organizations is encouraging the Legislature to put the question on the 2016 ballot. State Rep Continue reading
\nPrivacy advocates want amendment to protect personal data<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"