Despite shared concerns, pioneers in the movement say the methods of a newer generation abridge free speech and hurt the cause.<\/p>\n
In December 1998, a U.S.-based hacker group called Legions of the Underground declared cyberwar on Iraq and China and prepared to protest human rights abuses in those countries by disrupting their Internet access. <\/p>\n
About a week later, a coalition of hackers from groups including Cult of the Dead Cow (cDc), L0pht, Chaos Computer Club in Germany, and hacker mags 2600 and Phrack issued a statement condemning the move. \"We - the undersigned - strongly oppose any attempt to use the power of hacking to threaten to destroy the information infrastructure of a country, for any reason,\" the statement said. \"One cannot legitimately hope to improve a nation's free access to information by working to disable its data networks.\" <\/p>\n
Oxblood Ruffin of Cult of the Dead Cow and Hacktivismo <\/p>\n
Legions of the Underground got the message and backed down. The hackers went back to embarrassing Microsoft by exploiting security weaknesses in Windows, partying at DefCon in Las Vegas, and testing the line between white hat and gray hat security as they explored the limits and frontiers of technology. <\/p>\n
But the line that was drawn back then is again being crossed. <\/p>\n
This time it's hackers and online activists working under the banner of Anonymous who are using Web site defacements, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, and data theft, ostensibly to press their campaign for Internet freedom and human rights. The group, because of its lack of leadership and organization, also finds itself calling for seemingly contradictory operations including both urging people to vote in the elections this year as part of Occupy the Vote and a \"declaration of war\" on the U.S. over proposed cybersecurity legislation, urging a vague destruction of the government but not a computer attack or physical protest. <\/p>\n
The former \"chief evangelist for hacktivism\" at the cDc, Oxblood Ruffin, says this is not the way of a true hacktivist. <\/p>\n
\"Anonymous is fighting for free speech on the Internet, but it's hard to support that when you're DoS-ing and not allowing people to talk. How is that consistent?\" Oxblood Ruffin said in an interview this week with CNET. \"They remind me of awkward teenagers. I think they're trying to do the right thing, but they're stumbling around and doing some really stupid sh**.\" <\/p>\n
Hacktivismo The cDc members were early hacktivists. A member named Omega coined the term \"hacktivist\" in an e-mail to the group in 1996, partly tongue-in-cheek. \"We were providing ridicule and social commentary,\" Oxblood Ruffin said. \"We were opinion leaders in the computer underground.\" <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Read more: Despite shared concerns, pioneers in the movement say the methods of a newer generation abridge free speech and hurt the cause. In December 1998, a U.S.-based hacker group called Legions of the Underground declared cyberwar on Iraq and China and prepared to protest human rights abuses in those countries by disrupting their Internet access. Continue reading
\nOld-time hacktivists to Anonymous: You've crossed the line<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"