Lacking search warrants while using radar devices that look through walls to determine whether houses are occupied, some law enforcers reveal much more: yet another assault on Americans' Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. <\/p>\n
At least 50 agencies, including the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service, have been using these devices for more than two years with little notice to the courts and no public disclosure of when or how they would be used, USA Today reports. Detecting movements as slight as human breathing from more than 50 feet and showing whether people inside a house are moving, the marshals' devices can't show pictures of what's happening inside but other devices can. <\/p>\n
Developed for use in Iraq and Afghanistan, these devices indeed have value for combat and hostage situations. But their warrantless use in law enforcement searches raises what federal appellate judges in Denver, considering such a case involving a parole violator's arrest, called grave Fourth Amendment questions. <\/p>\n
The Supreme Court has held the Fourth Amendment line against warrantless searches that use drug-sniffing dogs and thermal-imaging devices outside houses. When a warrantless radar-snooping test case arrives, which can't happen soon enough, the justices must reaffirm the Fourth Amendment's time-tested directive against law-enforcement overreach: Get a warrant. <\/p>\n
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service. <\/p>\n
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information. <\/p>\n
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers. <\/p>\n
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers. <\/p>\n
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites. <\/p>\n
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
View post: Lacking search warrants while using radar devices that look through walls to determine whether houses are occupied, some law enforcers reveal much more: yet another assault on Americans' Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. At least 50 agencies, including the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service, have been using these devices for more than two years with little notice to the courts and no public disclosure of when or how they would be used, USA Today reports. Continue reading
\nRadar searches: Get a warrant<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"