{"id":4994,"date":"2012-11-12T23:44:09","date_gmt":"2012-11-12T23:44:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/supreme-court-to-weigh-criminal-dna-law\/"},"modified":"2012-11-12T23:44:09","modified_gmt":"2012-11-12T23:44:09","slug":"supreme-court-to-weigh-criminal-dna-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/supreme-court-to-weigh-criminal-dna-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court to weigh criminal DNA law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer    <\/p>\n<p>      updated 6:12 PM EST, Fri November 9, 2012    <\/p>\n<p>          STORY HIGHLIGHTS        <\/p>\n<p>      Washington (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court      will decide whether police can take DNA samples from criminal      suspects following their arrest, a case based on Maryland law      with potentially national implications for the use of a      popular investigative tool.    <\/p>\n<p>      Justices will weigh a challenge to the state's law by Alonzo      King, who was convicted of a 2003 rape on Maryland's Eastern      Shore with the assistance of genetic material obtained      following his arrest three years ago on an unrelated assault      charge.    <\/p>\n<p>      King moved to suppress the use of the DNA on Fourth Amendment      grounds, but was ultimately convicted of the rape offense.    <\/p>\n<p>      Federal law in 1994 created a national database in which      local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies could      compare and share information on DNA matches from convicted      felons. But courts have been at odds on just when such      samples can be collected and the information distributed.    <\/p>\n<p>      A divided Maryland Court of Appeals agreed with King, saying      suspects under arrest enjoy a higher level of privacy than a      convicted felon. This, the court said, outweighed the state's      law enforcement interests.    <\/p>\n<p>      The appeals court also said that obtaining King's DNA      immediately after arrest was not necessary in identifying him      and that the process was more personally invasive than      standard fingerprinting.    <\/p>\n<p>      State officials asked the Supreme Court to intervene, saying      the state court ruling \"resulted in the loss of a valuable      crime-fighting tool.\" They said that from a law enforcement      and forensic perspective, there is no difference between      fingerprinting and collecting \"biometric information.\"    <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Read the rest here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2012\/11\/09\/justice\/court-dna\/index.html\" title=\"Supreme Court to weigh criminal DNA law\">Supreme Court to weigh criminal DNA law<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer updated 6:12 PM EST, Fri November 9, 2012 STORY HIGHLIGHTS Washington (CNN) -- The U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/supreme-court-to-weigh-criminal-dna-law\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4994"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}