Syracuse, N.Y. -- Critics of genetically modified organisms are criticizing SUNY ESF's announcement that it had genetically engineered an American chestnut tree resistant to blight. <\/p>\n
\"Genetically engineered chestnuts and other trees are an unnecessary, undesirable, and hazardous product of the techno-obsessed mindset that assumes genetic codes are like Lego sets that can be engineered to our specifications,\" said Rachel Smolker, a member of the Campaign to STOP Genetically Engineered Trees, in a statement issued today. \"The impacts of these engineered chestnuts will be completely unpredictable.\" <\/p>\n
After 25 years of research, scientists at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry announced last month they had created a new strain of blight-resistant American chestnut that could restore the once-abundant tree to the forest. Researchers said they had inserted a wheat gene that could help chestnuts withstand the blight that wiped out up to 5 billion of the trees in the United States. <\/p>\n
The Global Justice Ecology Project has also criticized the SUNY-ESF research, saying it had been supported in part by corporations who want to profit from genetically engineered crops, including Monsanto and ArborGen. <\/p>\n
\"A look at the partners and funders of this program at SUNY ESF over the years reveals some very disturbing bedfellows,\" said the group's executive director, Anne Petermann, in an article titled \"This Holiday Season say NO to GMO Chestnuts.\" <\/p>\n
ESF's American Chestnut Research and Restoration Project website lists Monsanto and ArborGen as donors. <\/p>\n
The latest criticism follows a letter to the editor to Syracuse.com last month, in which Martha Crouch, a biologist with the Center for Food Safety, said release of the tree in the wild is premature. <\/p>\n
\"The researchers' dream could become a nightmare if something goes wrong,\" Crouch wrote. \"Genetically engineered trees will be difficult to recall once they spread.\" <\/p>\n
One Washington Post columnist has come to the defense of the SUNY ESF research, saying the restoration of the tree could provide an important source of food in the nutrient-rich nuts -- the kind that used to be roasted like in that Christmas song. <\/p>\n
\"It wasn't created for personal profit or for the benefit of corporations or farmers,\" wrote columnist Tamar Haspel. \"It contributes to a wholesome, healthful diet. And it's intended solely for the public good.\" <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the article here: Syracuse, N.Y. -- Critics of genetically modified organisms are criticizing SUNY ESF's announcement that it had genetically engineered an American chestnut tree resistant to blight. Continue reading
\nGenetic-engineering critics open fire on American chestnut breakthrough at SUNY ESF<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"