{"id":44085,"date":"2014-11-03T14:44:32","date_gmt":"2014-11-03T19:44:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/plants-breaking-down-dna-by-genome\/"},"modified":"2014-11-03T14:44:32","modified_gmt":"2014-11-03T19:44:32","slug":"plants-breaking-down-dna-by-genome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/plants-breaking-down-dna-by-genome\/","title":{"rendered":"Plants: Breaking down DNA by genome"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  New DNA sequencing technologies have greatly advanced genomic and  metagenomic studies in plant biology. Scientists can readily  obtain extensive genetic information for any plant species of  interest, at a relatively low cost, rapidly accelerating the pace  of genome sequencing.<\/p>\n<p>    However, since plant tissues harbor three separate genomes    (nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial), it can often be    challenging to isolate the particular genome of interest from    extracted DNA samples. Sequencing DNA containing all three    genomes therefore results in a considerable amount of wasted    data, for example, if only the chloroplast genome is desired    for the study.  <\/p>\n<p>    Methods exist to isolate particular genomic regions, but each    of these has drawbacks. For example, some protocols require    extensive lab work, while others (e.g., long-range PCR and    hybrid enrichment) require prior knowledge of the genomic    regions of interest.  <\/p>\n<p>    A new method by researchers from New England Biolabs and New    Mexico State University provides plant biologists with a quick    and simple approach for separating plant nuclear DNA from    organellar DNA for genomic and metagenomic studies. The    approach, published in the November issue of Applications    in Plant Sciences, targets the methyl-CpG-binding domain,    following a similar method applied for genomic studies of    humans.  <\/p>\n<p>    The method relies on differences in CpG methylation between    nuclear and organellar (i.e., chloroplast and mitochondrial)    genomes in plants. Compared to the nuclear genome, the    chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes essentially lack CpG    methylation (i.e., the addition of methyl groups to sites in    the genome where cytosine and guanine occur side by side).  <\/p>\n<p>    Given these different methylation patterns, the researchers    used specialized magnetic beads that hybridize with    methyl-CpG-rich DNA regions in an attempt to separate nuclear    DNA from organellar DNA in total genomic DNA samples. They then    sequenced the methyl-enriched portion and the methyl-depleted    portion separately. They found that the methyl-enriched sample    contained a considerable increase in concentration of nuclear    DNA, while the methyl-depleted sample contained an increased    concentration of organellar DNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    Dr. Donovan Bailey, senior author of the study and professor at    New Mexico State University, said this approach has several    advantages over previously established methods for enriching    either nuclear or organellar DNA for genome sequencing.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Our primary perceived benefit includes the development of a    means of partitioning DNA by genomic origin when one has no    prior knowledge of the genomes being studied, other than the    domain of origin -- nuclear, organellar, or prokaryote.    Furthermore, not requiring extensive starting material and the    speed are benefits relative to some methods.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    According to Bailey, this approach can also be used to target    genomes of endophytes (i.e., fungi that live in plants) and    prokaryotic parasites in plant DNA samples. Endophyte genomes    undergo CpG methylation, while prokaryotic genomes do not,    making it easy to sequence either of these along with the    particular plant genome(s) of interest. This will provide    researchers with greater insight on the diversity of other    eukaryotes and prokaryotes living inside plant tissues.  <\/p>\n<p>    Although this study focused on flowering plants, Bailey said    the approach will likely work well across other major plant    groups (e.g., ferns, gymnosperms).  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2014\/11\/141101173223.htm\/RK=0\/RS=bYamrmdndmFgXAbGc4sJBrJ6srU-\" title=\"Plants: Breaking down DNA by genome\">Plants: Breaking down DNA by genome<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> New DNA sequencing technologies have greatly advanced genomic and metagenomic studies in plant biology. Scientists can readily obtain extensive genetic information for any plant species of interest, at a relatively low cost, rapidly accelerating the pace of genome sequencing. However, since plant tissues harbor three separate genomes (nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial), it can often be challenging to isolate the particular genome of interest from extracted DNA samples <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/plants-breaking-down-dna-by-genome\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44085"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44085"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44085\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}