ScienceDaily (Oct. 23, 2012) Computer simulations provide new mathematical support for the \"grandmother hypothesis\" -- a famous theory that humans evolved longer adult lifespans than apes because grandmothers helped feed their grandchildren. <\/p>\n
\"Grandmothering was the initial step toward making us who we are,\" says Kristen Hawkes, a distinguished professor of anthropology at the University of Utah and senior author of the new study published Oct. 24 by the British journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. <\/p>\n
The simulations indicate that with only a little bit of grandmothering -- and without any assumptions about human brain size -- animals with chimpanzee lifespans evolve in less than 60,000 years so they have a human lifespan. Female chimps rarely live past child-bearing years, usually into their 30s and sometimes their 40s. Human females often live decades past their child-bearing years. <\/p>\n
The findings showed that from the time adulthood is reached, the simulated creatures lived another 25 years like chimps, yet after 24,000 to 60,000 years of grandmothers caring for grandchildren, the creatures who reached adulthood lived another 49 years -- as do human hunter-gatherers. <\/p>\n
The grandmother hypothesis says that when grandmothers help feed their grandchildren after weaning, their daughters can produce more children at shorter intervals; the children become younger at weaning but older when they first can feed themselves and when they reach adulthood; and women end up with postmenopausal lifespans just like ours. <\/p>\n
By allowing their daughters to have more children, a few ancestral females who lived long enough to become grandmothers passed their longevity genes to more descendants, who had longer adult lifespans as a result. <\/p>\n
Hawkes conducted the new study with first author and mathematical biologist Peter Kim, a former University of Utah postdoctoral researcher now on the University of Sydney faculty, and James Coxworth, a University of Utah doctoral student in anthropology. The study was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Australian Research Council. <\/p>\n
How Grandmothering Came to Be <\/p>\n
Hawkes, University of Utah anthropologist James O'Connell and UCLA anthropologist Nicholas Blurton Jones formally proposed the grandmother hypothesis in 1997, and it has been debated ever since. Once major criticism was that it lacked a mathematical underpinning -- something the new study sought to provide. <\/p>\n
The hypothesis stemmed from observations by Hawkes and O'Connell in the 1980s when they lived with Tanzania's Hazda hunter-gatherer people and watched older women spend their days collecting tubers and other foods for their grandchildren. Except for humans, all other primates and mammals collect their own food after weaning. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Read the original here: ScienceDaily (Oct. 23, 2012) Computer simulations provide new mathematical support for the \"grandmother hypothesis\" -- a famous theory that humans evolved longer adult lifespans than apes because grandmothers helped feed their grandchildren Continue reading
\nGrandmas made humans live longer: Chimp lifespan evolves into human longevity, computer simulation shows<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"