{"id":36668,"date":"2014-09-04T14:41:43","date_gmt":"2014-09-04T18:41:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/linkedin-rethinks-support-of-chinas-censorship\/"},"modified":"2014-09-04T14:41:43","modified_gmt":"2014-09-04T18:41:43","slug":"linkedin-rethinks-support-of-chinas-censorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/linkedin-rethinks-support-of-chinas-censorship\/","title":{"rendered":"LinkedIn rethinks support of China&#39;s censorship"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      LinkedIn is thinking twice about its adoption of China's      aggressive censorship. Photo: Reuters    <\/p>\n<p>    Beijing: After complaints and clear examples of bowing    to Chinese censorship diktats, LinkedIn says it may have acted    too hastily in friending China's government.  <\/p>\n<p>    LinkedIn executives said they were reconsidering their    policies, after seven months of censoring content from China    deemed too sensitive.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We do want to get this right, and we are strongly considering    changing our policy so that content from our Chinese members    that is not allowed in China will still be viewed globally,\"    Hani Durzy, a spokesman for the California-based    companysaid.  <\/p>\n<p>    The professional social networking site is the latest to    wrestle with the moral quandaries that come with doing business    in China amid the government's paranoia about the internet.    Facebook, Twitter and Google are largely blocked here.  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    LinkedIn, however, thought it could make it work. In February,    the company launched its Chinese-language website and set up    operations in China. In return, it promised to follow Chinese    government rules and started self-censoring content.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Mr Durzy insisted back then that the company would do so    only when \"legally required.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Then, in June, came the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square    crackdown. The anniversary, a perennial headache for web users    in China, is marked by a clampdown on search terms, internet    speeds and intense government scrutiny.  <\/p>\n<p>    LinkedIn users reported posts about Tiananmen being blocked    even in Hong Kong, which lies outsides China's censorship    firewall. LinkedIn said at the time that it was an accident.    And it said that although such content was self-censored in    China, it would remain \"accessible elsewhere in the world\".  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/world\/linkedin-rethinks-support-of-chinas-censorship-20140904-10c7zi.html\/RK=0\/RS=ofpS0SRV4bLYtiMK703wv_VU8tU-\" title=\"LinkedIn rethinks support of China&#39;s censorship\">LinkedIn rethinks support of China&#39;s censorship<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> LinkedIn is thinking twice about its adoption of China's aggressive censorship. Photo: Reuters Beijing: After complaints and clear examples of bowing to Chinese censorship diktats, LinkedIn says it may have acted too hastily in friending China's government.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/linkedin-rethinks-support-of-chinas-censorship\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36668","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36668"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36668"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36668\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36668"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}