{"id":36569,"date":"2014-09-03T14:41:54","date_gmt":"2014-09-03T18:41:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/worldviews-linkedin-thinking-twice-about-its-adoption-of-chinas-aggressive-censorship\/"},"modified":"2014-09-03T14:41:54","modified_gmt":"2014-09-03T18:41:54","slug":"worldviews-linkedin-thinking-twice-about-its-adoption-of-chinas-aggressive-censorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/worldviews-linkedin-thinking-twice-about-its-adoption-of-chinas-aggressive-censorship\/","title":{"rendered":"WorldViews: LinkedIn thinking twice about its adoption of Chinas aggressive censorship"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      An image from LinkedIn's Chinese-language Web site.    <\/p>\n<p>    After complaints and clear examples of bowing to Chinese    censorship diktats, LinkedIn says it may have acted too hastily    in friending Chinas government.  <\/p>\n<p>    LinkedIn executives said Tuesday that they are reconsidering    their policies, after seven months of censoring content from    China deemed too sensitive.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We do want to get this right, and we are strongly considering    changing our policy so that content from our Chinese members    that is not allowed in China will still be viewed globally,    Hani Durzy, a spokesman for the Mountain View, Calif.-based    company,     told Bloomberg.  <\/p>\n<p>    The professional social networking site is just the latest to    wrestle with the moral quandaries that come with doing business    in China amid the government's paranoia about the Internet.    Facebook, Twitter and Google are largely blocked here.  <\/p>\n<p>    LinkedIn, however, thought it could make it work. In February,    the company launched its Chinese-language Web site and set up    operations in China. In return, it promised to follow Chinese    government rules and started self-censoring content.  <\/p>\n<p>    But spokesman Durzy insisted back then that the company would    do so only when legally required.  <\/p>\n<p>    Then, in June, came the     anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown. The    anniversary, a perennial headache for Web users in China, is    marked by a clampdown on search terms, Internet speeds and    intense government scrutiny.  <\/p>\n<p>    LinkedIn users reported posts about Tiananmen being blocked    even in Hong Kong, which lies outsides Chinas censorship    firewall. LinkedIn said at the time that it was an     accident.And it said that although such content was    self-censored in China, it would remain accessible elsewhere    in the world.  <\/p>\n<p>    But some users said that wasnt true.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.washingtonpost.com\/c\/34656\/f\/636708\/s\/3e1c7b4a\/sc\/1\/l\/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Clinkedin0Ethinking0Etwice0Eabout0Eits0Eadoption0Eof0Echinas0Eaggressive0Ecensorship0C20A140C0A90C0A30C921a48770E38f10E4a190E811a0Ef84f9519ba30A0Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Iworld\/story01.htm\/RK=0\/RS=_Epme6ykYs4hBUorVzIhYHkhrYk-\" title=\"WorldViews: LinkedIn thinking twice about its adoption of Chinas aggressive censorship\">WorldViews: LinkedIn thinking twice about its adoption of Chinas aggressive censorship<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> An image from LinkedIn's Chinese-language Web site. After complaints and clear examples of bowing to Chinese censorship diktats, LinkedIn says it may have acted too hastily in friending Chinas government <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/worldviews-linkedin-thinking-twice-about-its-adoption-of-chinas-aggressive-censorship\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36569"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36569"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36569\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}