{"id":32944,"date":"2014-05-07T23:48:31","date_gmt":"2014-05-08T03:48:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ex-irs-official-held-in-contempt\/"},"modified":"2014-05-07T23:48:31","modified_gmt":"2014-05-08T03:48:31","slug":"ex-irs-official-held-in-contempt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fifth-amendment\/ex-irs-official-held-in-contempt\/","title":{"rendered":"Ex-IRS official held in contempt"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        STORY HIGHLIGHTS      <\/p>\n<p>    (CNN) -- Acting on a conservative battle cry    and potentially triggering a court battle with the Obama    administration, the Republican-led House voted Wednesday to    hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress    for refusing to answer questions about her agency's targeting    of conservative and other groups.  <\/p>\n<p>    The 231-187 vote fell almost entirely along party lines, a    decision that cut across three sharp divides: balance of power    issues between the branches of government, political questions    over the IRS scandal, and a Constitutional debate over Lerner's    individual Fifth Amendment rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lerner is in the middle of that trio. Until she retired last    year, she ran the IRS division in charge of tax exempt status.    An inspector general's report concluded her staff had    inappropriately targeted Tea Party and other groups for extra    scrutiny.  <\/p>\n<p>    The term \"progressive\" was also flagged but the inspector    general report indicated that conservative terms drew more    attention from the IRS.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Fifth Amendment question  <\/p>\n<p>    For nearly a year, Lerner has refused House requests to testify    on the matter, citing her Fifth Amendment right against    self-incrimination.  <\/p>\n<p>    Republicans insist that doesn't apply here, that she waived the    right by first asserting her innocence when she appeared before    the House Oversight Committee last May.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Mrs. Lerner made 17 separate factual assertions before    invoking her right to remain silent,\" proclaimed Rep. Richard    Nugent, Republican of Florida, as he opened up Wednesday's    debate. \"You can't make selective assertions and still invoke    your Fifth Amendment right.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Lerner's attorney, William Taylor, has dismissed that argument    repeatedly and sent a statement rejecting it again Wednesday.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2014\/05\/07\/politics\/house-contempt-irs\/index.html\/RK=0\/RS=yF2V6P40.vuPLtJ5Xelk11SzZuk-\" title=\"Ex-IRS official held in contempt\">Ex-IRS official held in contempt<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> STORY HIGHLIGHTS (CNN) -- Acting on a conservative battle cry and potentially triggering a court battle with the Obama administration, the Republican-led House voted Wednesday to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions about her agency's targeting of conservative and other groups. The 231-187 vote fell almost entirely along party lines, a decision that cut across three sharp divides: balance of power issues between the branches of government, political questions over the IRS scandal, and a Constitutional debate over Lerner's individual Fifth Amendment rights. Lerner is in the middle of that trio <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fifth-amendment\/ex-irs-official-held-in-contempt\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94880],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32944","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fifth-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32944"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32944"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32944\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}