{"id":32720,"date":"2014-05-06T11:47:51","date_gmt":"2014-05-06T15:47:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-consider-gun-rights-case\/"},"modified":"2014-05-06T11:47:51","modified_gmt":"2014-05-06T15:47:51","slug":"us-supreme-court-refuses-to-consider-gun-rights-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment-2\/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-consider-gun-rights-case\/","title":{"rendered":"US Supreme Court refuses to consider gun-rights case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    WASHINGTON - The US Supreme Court on Monday refused to take up    a case over whether Americans have a constitutional right to    bear arms in public.  <\/p>\n<p>    It comes amid a rumbling and divisive debate between pro- and    anti-gun lobbies after several high-profile shootings or    massacres in recent years.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Second Amendment to the US Constitution gives citizens the    right to bear arms, but states have enacted various laws    governing gun ownership.  <\/p>\n<p>    John Drake, who operates an ATM business, was challenging a    strict New Jersey state law that requires people wanting to    carry a handgun outside the home to demonstrate a \"justifiable    need.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Backed by the powerful National Rifle Association (NRA), Drake    argued that his employees need to be able to defend themselves    because they are carrying large sums of money.  <\/p>\n<p>    The NRA said in its argument backing Drake: \"The Second    Amendment guarantees the right to carry weapons for the purpose    of self-defence - not just for self-defence within the home,    but for self-defence - period.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    It added that the \"right to bear arms for self-defence\" was \"as    important outside the home as inside.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment    guarantees the right to possess a gun at home for self-defence.  <\/p>\n<p>    But in dismissing the complaint, the Supreme Court upheld a    lower court of appeal decision stating that the New Jersey law    is consistent with the Second Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    It has declined to hear similar challenges to the concealed    carry laws of New York and Maryland.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/asiaone.feedsportal.com\/c\/34151\/f\/618417\/s\/3a18a0a2\/sc\/1\/l\/0L0Sasiaone0N0Cnews0Cworld0Cus0Esupreme0Ecourt0Erefuses0Econsider0Egun0Erights0Ecase\/story01.htm\/RK=0\/RS=krg0.jtBqcg84uCsBqElKZ2MWYk-\" title=\"US Supreme Court refuses to consider gun-rights case\">US Supreme Court refuses to consider gun-rights case<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> WASHINGTON - The US Supreme Court on Monday refused to take up a case over whether Americans have a constitutional right to bear arms in public. It comes amid a rumbling and divisive debate between pro- and anti-gun lobbies after several high-profile shootings or massacres in recent years. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution gives citizens the right to bear arms, but states have enacted various laws governing gun ownership.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment-2\/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-consider-gun-rights-case\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94878],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32720"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}