{"id":32250,"date":"2014-05-03T06:49:16","date_gmt":"2014-05-03T10:49:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberal-supreme-court-justice-comes-to-the-defense-of-scalia\/"},"modified":"2014-05-03T06:49:16","modified_gmt":"2014-05-03T10:49:16","slug":"liberal-supreme-court-justice-comes-to-the-defense-of-scalia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fourth-amendment\/liberal-supreme-court-justice-comes-to-the-defense-of-scalia\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberal Supreme Court Justice Comes To The Defense Of Scalia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        Larry Downing\/Reuters      <\/p>\n<p>    When asked about polarization between justices, Ginsburg said    that liberals who criticize the conservative Scalia forget that    he \"is one of the most pro-Fourth Amendment judges on the    court.\" The Fourth Amendment protects U.S. citizens from    unreasonable searches and seizures. Here is an excerpt from    that interview:  <\/p>\n<p>    WSJ: How deeply polarized is the court?  <\/p>\n<p>    GINSBURG: [Justice Antonin] Scalia is often    criticized by people who would not be labeled conservative.    Liberals dont count his Fourth Amendment cases or the    confrontation clause cases. He is one of the most pro-Fourth    Amendment judges on the court.  <\/p>\n<p>    WSJ: Not more pro-Fourth Amendment than you.  <\/p>\n<p>    GINSBURG: No. But weve been together in all    the confrontation cases and many of the Fourth Amendment cases.    For example, that wonderful, wonderful one with the GPS, and    the dog sniff cases.  <\/p>\n<p>    The \"GPS case\" was United    States v. Jones, in which both justices sided with the    courts 2012 ruling that police violated the Fourth Amendment    when they attached a GPS device to track a vehicle. In the    Florida    v. Jardines case, Ginsburg and Scalia both sided with the    courts 2013 ruling that police officers use of a    drug-sniffing dog at a persons front porch constituted a    search under the Fourth Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    In both of those cases, it was Scalia who delivered the Supreme    Courts opinion.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are other recent examples where Scalia has demonstrated    pro-Fourth Amendment opinions,     as the Los Angeles Times has reported. That includes    Scalias opposition to the Supreme Courts majority opinion    that permits police to use anonymous tips to stop cars on    highways. And in 2013, he fiercely dissented to the Courts    ruling that police can routinely swab for DNA from arrested    people.  <\/p>\n<p>    Recently, the     Supreme Court has considered whether police can search the    digital contents of cellphones without warrants. In reporting    on this case, a number of news outlets noted that Scalia        has become a champion of the Fourth Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/ruth-bader-ginsburg-praises-antonin-scalia-2014-5\/RK=0\/RS=2zxuHy5i4uFj884TCXAoGkGKdeU-\" title=\"Liberal Supreme Court Justice Comes To The Defense Of Scalia\">Liberal Supreme Court Justice Comes To The Defense Of Scalia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Larry Downing\/Reuters When asked about polarization between justices, Ginsburg said that liberals who criticize the conservative Scalia forget that he \"is one of the most pro-Fourth Amendment judges on the court.\" The Fourth Amendment protects U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fourth-amendment\/liberal-supreme-court-justice-comes-to-the-defense-of-scalia\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94879],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fourth-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32250"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32250\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}