hide captionMonday the Supreme Court hears the case concerning what kind of speech is protected for public employees. <\/p>\n
Monday the Supreme Court hears the case concerning what kind of speech is protected for public employees. <\/p>\n
The current conservative Supreme Court majority has a well-earned reputation for protecting the First Amendment right to free speech, whether in the form of campaign spending or protests at military funerals. <\/p>\n
But in one area the first amendment rights of public employees the conservative majority has been far less protective of the right to speak out. Now the court is revisiting the issue, and the result could have far-reaching consequences for public corruption investigations. <\/p>\n
Edward Lane was fired because he testified truthfully that an Alabama state legislator was a no-show employee, being paid by the taxpayers for no work. <\/p>\n
He was hired in 2006 to head a program for juvenile offenders, providing counseling and education as an alternative to incarceration. The program was run out of Central Alabama Community College and received substantial federal funds. <\/p>\n
After he was hired, Lane conducted an audit and learned that one of the program's best paid employees, a state representative named Suzanne Schmitz, was not showing up for work. After Schmitz refused to change her ways, Lane had what he describes as an \"ugly\" meeting with the state legislator. <\/p>\n
\"She began to tell me who she was, and did I know who she was for real,\" said Lane. <\/p>\n
Lane says that people in his office warned him not to tangle with Schmitz because of her influence, but, as he puts it, \"To me, it's like being president of the bank. If I know one of my tellers is stealing from the bank, and I allow it to go on, I'm complicit.\" <\/p>\n
And so he fired Schmitz. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Continue reading here: <\/p>\n
How A Public Corruption Scandal Became A Fight Over Free Speech<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" hide captionMonday the Supreme Court hears the case concerning what kind of speech is protected for public employees. Monday the Supreme Court hears the case concerning what kind of speech is protected for public employees. Continue reading