{"id":30739,"date":"2014-04-25T13:44:22","date_gmt":"2014-04-25T17:44:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/bloody-souvenir-not-from-decapitated-french-king-dna\/"},"modified":"2014-04-25T13:44:22","modified_gmt":"2014-04-25T17:44:22","slug":"bloody-souvenir-not-from-decapitated-french-king-dna","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/bloody-souvenir-not-from-decapitated-french-king-dna\/","title":{"rendered":"Bloody souvenir not from decapitated French king  DNA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  The DNA in the calabash belonged to a single person whose genetic  signature, from northern Italy, was not 'compatible' with King  Louis XVI's known, more central-European ancestry<\/p>\n<p>    PARIS, France  Two centuries after the French people beheaded    King Louis XVI and dipped their handkerchiefs in his blood, DNA    analysis has thrown new doubt on the authenticity of one such    rag kept as a morbid souvenir.  <\/p>\n<p>    The contents of an ornately-decorated gourd alleged to hold    traces of the king's dried blood has long been the subject of    scientific disagreement, with tests throwing up contradictory    results.  <\/p>\n<p>    On Thursday, April 24, a team from Europe and the United States    said they had sequenced the full genome of the DNA in the    squash, and found it was unlikely to be from someone tall or    blue-eyed  both features ascribed to the 18th century monarch.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The results of these analyses do not support the royal    identity of the sequenced genome,\" the authors concluded in a    study in the journal Nature Scientific Reports.  <\/p>\n<p>    Researchers have been trying for years to verify a claim    imprinted on the calabash that: \"On January 21, Maximilien    Bourdaloue dipped his handkerchief in the blood of Louis XVI    after his decapitation\" in Paris in 1793.  <\/p>\n<p>    He is then said to have placed the fabric in the dried, hollow    gourd and had it embellished with portraits of revolutionary    heroes.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2010, a study said DNA analysis of blood traces found inside    the ornate vegetable revealed a match for someone of Louis'    description, including his blue eyes.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the authors of that paper, Carles Lalueza-Fox of the    Institute of Evolutionary Biology in Barcelona, also    participated in the latest study, which contradicts the    blue-eyed finding.  <\/p>\n<p>    He told Agence France-Presse (AFP) the latest DNA analysis was    much more complete: \"we have now the whole genome of the person    (in) the gourd.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rappler.com\/science-nature\/society-culture\/56314-bloody-souvenir-french-king-dna\/RK=0\/RS=Sn75uNHeY75JwHg87pjfbXQ_QNw-\" title=\"Bloody souvenir not from decapitated French king  DNA\">Bloody souvenir not from decapitated French king  DNA<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The DNA in the calabash belonged to a single person whose genetic signature, from northern Italy, was not 'compatible' with King Louis XVI's known, more central-European ancestry PARIS, France Two centuries after the French people beheaded King Louis XVI and dipped their handkerchiefs in his blood, DNA analysis has thrown new doubt on the authenticity of one such rag kept as a morbid souvenir. The contents of an ornately-decorated gourd alleged to hold traces of the king's dried blood has long been the subject of scientific disagreement, with tests throwing up contradictory results.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/bloody-souvenir-not-from-decapitated-french-king-dna\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30739"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30739"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30739\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}