{"id":30635,"date":"2014-04-24T17:44:53","date_gmt":"2014-04-24T21:44:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fda-oks-first-ever-dna-alternative-to-pap-smear\/"},"modified":"2014-04-24T17:44:53","modified_gmt":"2014-04-24T21:44:53","slug":"fda-oks-first-ever-dna-alternative-to-pap-smear","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/fda-oks-first-ever-dna-alternative-to-pap-smear\/","title":{"rendered":"FDA OKs First-Ever DNA Alternative To Pap Smear"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    WASHINGTON (AP)  Federal health regulators have cleared a    genetic test from Roche as the first ever U.S.-approved    alternative to the Pap smear, the decades-old mainstay of    cervical cancer screening.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Food and Drug Administration approved Roche's cobas HPV    test to detect the human Papillomavirus, or HPV, in women 25    and up. HPV causes nearly all cases of cervical cancer.  <\/p>\n<p>    Doctors already use such DNA-based tools as a follow-up to    confirm Pap test results. But Thursday's decision means Roche    can now market its test as a stand-alone option for cervical    cancer screening, ahead of the Pap test.  <\/p>\n<p>    Roche supported its bid for expanded marketing with study    results suggesting genetic testing is more accurate and    objective at identifying cancerous growths than Pap smear     which requires doctors to examine cervical cells under a    microscope for signs of cancer.  <\/p>\n<p>    The FDA approval comes despite pushback from a number of    women's health groups, who warned regulators that approving the    DNA test as an alternative to Pap testing could lead to    confusion, higher costs and overtreatment. More than a dozen    patient groups raised those concerns in a letter to the FDA    last week. Specifically, they said HPV-only testing could lead    to overtreatment of younger women who carry the virus but have    little risk of developing actual cancer. Most sexually active    young people contract HPV, though their bodies usually    eliminate the virus within a few months. Only years-long    infections develop into cancer.  <\/p>\n<p>    FDA officials said in a statement Thursday that they approved    the test because \"Roche Diagnostics conducted a well-designed    study that provided the FDA with a reasonable assurance of the    safety and effectiveness.\" The trial included over 47,000 women    who underwent cervical screening using either Pap or HPV    screening. The test results were then checked for accuracy    against final biopsy results that confirmed whether they    actually had cancer.  <\/p>\n<p>    For decades the Pap test was the only screening option for    cervical cancer  and it's had a remarkably successful track    record. The number of cervical cancer cases reported in the    U.S. has decreased more than 50 percent in the past 30 years,    primarily due to increased Pap screening. Still, an estimated    12,000 cases of cervical cancer are expected to be diagnosed    this year, a fact that has spurred development of HPV tests    like those from Roche, Qiagen and other test makers. HPV test    costs generally cost between $80 and $100, about twice as much    as a $40 Pap.  <\/p>\n<p>    Medical guidelines have been evolving rapidly to try and    incorporate both techniques. Under the latest guidelines from    the American Cancer Society, a Pap test is recommended every    three years for women 21 to 29 years old. Women 30 and older    should have both a Pap test and an HPV test every five years,    or a Pap test alone every three years. HPV screening is not    recommended for women in their 20s because it increases the    odds of more invasive testing that can leave the cervix less    able to handle pregnancy later in life.  <\/p>\n<p>    But the FDA approval allows Roche to market its test for women    as young as 25. Women who test positive for the most high-risk    strains of HPV will be referred directly to colposcopy, an    invasive test in which doctors view the cervix with a    magnifying device and often collect a tissue sample for    testing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Groups including the Cancer Prevention and Treatment Fund,    American Medical Women's Association and Our Bodies Ourselves    questioned why the FDA would approve labeling that goes against    medical society recommendations  which only recommend HPV    screening for women 30 and older.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/templates\/story\/story.php?storyId=306544299&ft=1&f=\/RK=0\/RS=x1dNXAHq_f5tksWuvW4oMNJSGFE-\" title=\"FDA OKs First-Ever DNA Alternative To Pap Smear\">FDA OKs First-Ever DNA Alternative To Pap Smear<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> WASHINGTON (AP) Federal health regulators have cleared a genetic test from Roche as the first ever U.S.-approved alternative to the Pap smear, the decades-old mainstay of cervical cancer screening. The Food and Drug Administration approved Roche's cobas HPV test to detect the human Papillomavirus, or HPV, in women 25 and up. HPV causes nearly all cases of cervical cancer.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/fda-oks-first-ever-dna-alternative-to-pap-smear\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30635"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30635\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}