{"id":23660,"date":"2014-02-07T17:44:05","date_gmt":"2014-02-07T22:44:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/is-dna-barcoding-the-future-of-food-traceability\/"},"modified":"2014-02-07T17:44:05","modified_gmt":"2014-02-07T22:44:05","slug":"is-dna-barcoding-the-future-of-food-traceability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/is-dna-barcoding-the-future-of-food-traceability\/","title":{"rendered":"Is DNA Barcoding The Future Of Food Traceability?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    By Laurel    Maloy, contributing author, Food Online  <\/p>\n<p>    European research suggests DNA barcoding can greatly    increase speed and accuracy in identifying the origin of    contaminated food  <\/p>\n<p>    DNA Barcoding is the new cutting edge technology with the    ability to greatly improve the traceability of our food from    grower to dining table. The goal is to be able to identify    different species from a standardized section of the genome.    According to the European Food Information Council and    Food Research International, this    breakthrough would significantly enhance the ability and speed    of discovering the source of contaminated food products. It    would also serve to streamline a cumbersome and labor-intensive    process. But is it a viable and cost-effective solution?  <\/p>\n<p>    This latest advancement in traceability is the combination of two    widely utilized technologies. In the early 1970s, the    very first barcode readers were put into use in grocery stores.    Their purpose was to be able to better monitor pricing and    inventory while reducing costs. Today virtually everyone knows    what a UPC (Universal Product Code) is and has some idea of the    information it contains. The other half of the equation    is utilizing DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid). Since its advent in    1985, DNA testing and its evidentiary use has become routine.    DNA, once considered cutting edge, is now used to discern a    biological fingerprint with better than 99% accuracy and is    deemed commonplace.  <\/p>\n<p>    The success DNA barcoding will have in improving foods    traceability depends first upon the availability of high    quality DNA samples in national repositories. DNA databases for    human samples have taken a great deal of time to compile. The    same will be true for the vast number of DNA samples to be    gathered for the massive amount of food flowing through    the supply chain. DNA barcoding    success will also depend upon the broad molecular variability    between the ever-growing varieties of foods. This, in some    instances, has proven to be problematic, particularly in the    case of hybridized livestock and poultry.  <\/p>\n<p>    The goal for DNA barcoding is to always utilize the smallest    samples possible, comparing short genetic markers. There are    actually no technical limitations to DNA barcoding at the raw    material level. However, detractors argue that hybridization    occurs at the cultivar level of plants, and thus, would require    analysis of larger portions of the genome. This would be more    time-consuming, as well as more costly.  <\/p>\n<p>    Great strides are being made in DNA barcoding throughout    Europe. The technology has been used to identify certain types    of processed foods, such as fruit in yogurt    and juices, tea, purees, and chocolates. However, it should be    noted that the very act of processing foods can alter the DNA    structure, making the application of DNA barcoding on processed    commodities ineffective.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nevertheless, when it comes to identifying animal and plant    species, exclusive gene regions have been identified and approved. Using specialized    markers, samples can be sequenced quickly and inexpensively,    and are long enough to accurately identify the variations among    species.  <\/p>\n<p>    European researchers have concluded that    the idea of using DNA barcoding as a universal tool for    traceability has merit. Different regulatory authorities, i.e.:    the FDA, USDA, and CDC may use it in different contexts;    however, ultimately, this technology would be invaluable to    traceability and accountability. There is, though, a whole lot    of work to do before it shifts from idea to reality, just like    UPC scanning and DNA evidence.  <\/p>\n<p>    Want to publish your opinion?    Contact us to    become part of our Editorial Community.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.foodonline.com\/doc\/is-dna-barcoding-the-future-of-food-traceability-0001?atc~c=771 s=773 r=001 l=a\" title=\"Is DNA Barcoding The Future Of Food Traceability?\">Is DNA Barcoding The Future Of Food Traceability?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Laurel Maloy, contributing author, Food Online European research suggests DNA barcoding can greatly increase speed and accuracy in identifying the origin of contaminated food DNA Barcoding is the new cutting edge technology with the ability to greatly improve the traceability of our food from grower to dining table.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/is-dna-barcoding-the-future-of-food-traceability\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23660"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23660\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}