{"id":21926,"date":"2014-01-19T16:45:11","date_gmt":"2014-01-19T21:45:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/human-genetics-an-introduction-to-genetic-analysis-ncbi\/"},"modified":"2014-01-19T16:45:11","modified_gmt":"2014-01-19T21:45:11","slug":"human-genetics-an-introduction-to-genetic-analysis-ncbi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/human-genetics\/human-genetics-an-introduction-to-genetic-analysis-ncbi\/","title":{"rendered":"Human genetics &#8211; An Introduction to Genetic Analysis &#8211; NCBI &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  In the study of rare disorders, four general patterns of  inheritance are distinguishable by pedigree analysis:  autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, X-linked recessive, and  X-linked dominant.<\/p>\n<p>    The affected phenotype of an    autosomal recessive disorder is determined by a recessive allele,    and the corresponding unaffected phenotype is determined by a    dominant allele. For    example, the human disease phenylketonuria is inherited in a    simple Mendelian manner as a recessive phenotype,    with PKU determined by the allele p and the normal    condition by P . Therefore, sufferers from this disease    are of genotype p    \/p , and people who do not have the disease are either    P \/P or P \/p . What patterns in a    pedigree would reveal    such an inheritance? The two key points are that (1) generally    the disease appears in the progeny of unaffected parents and    (2) the affected progeny include both males and females. When    we know that both male and female progeny are affected, we can    assume that we are dealing with simple Mendelian inheritance,    not sex-linked inheritance. The following typical pedigree    illustrates the key point that affected children are born to    unaffected parents:  <\/p>\n<p>    From this pattern, we can immediately deduce simple Mendelian    inheritance of the recessive allele    responsible for the exceptional phenotype (indicated    in black). Furthermore, we can deduce that the parents are both    heterozygotes, say A \/a ; both    must have an a allele because each contributed an    a allele to each affected child, and both must have an    A allele because they are phenotypically normal. We can    identify the genotypes of the children (in the order shown) as    A \/, a \/a , a \/a , and    A \/. Hence, the pedigree can be    rewritten as follows:  <\/p>\n<p>    Note that this pedigree does not    support the hypothesis of X-linked recessive inheritance,    because, under that hypothesis, an affected daughter must have    a heterozygous mother (possible) and a hemizygous father, which    is clearly impossible, because he would have expressed the    phenotype of the    disorder.  <\/p>\n<p>    Notice another interesting feature of pedigree analysis:    even though Mendelian rules are at work, Mendelian ratios are    rarely observed in families, because the sample size is too    small. In the preceding example, we see a 1:1 phenotypic ratio    in the progeny of a monohybrid cross. If    the couple were to have, say, 20 children, the ratio would be    something like 15 unaffected children and 5 with PKU (a 3:1    ratio); but, in a sample of 4 children, any ratio is possible,    and all ratios are commonly found.  <\/p>\n<p>    The pedigrees of autosomal recessive disorders tend to look    rather bare, with few black symbols. A recessive condition    shows up in groups of affected siblings, and the people in    earlier and later generations tend not to be affected. To    understand why this is so, it is important to have some    understanding of the genetic structure of populations    underlying such rare conditions. By definition, if the    condition is rare, most people do not carry the abnormal    allele. Furthermore,    most of those people who do carry the abnormal allele are    heterozygous for it rather than homozygous. The basic reason    that heterozygotes are much more common than recessive    homozygotes is that, to be a recessive homozygote, both    parents must have had the a allele, but, to be a    heterozygote, only one    parent must carry the a allele.  <\/p>\n<p>    Geneticists have a quantitative way of connecting the rareness    of an allele with the    commonness or rarity of heterozygotes and homozygotes in a    population. They obtain the relative frequencies of genotypes    in a population by assuming that the population is in Hardy-Weinberg    equilibrium, to be fully discussed in Chapter 24 . Under    this simplifying assumption, if the relative proportions of two    alleles A and a in    a population are p and q , respectively, then the    frequencies of the three possible genotypes are given by    p 2 for A \/A , 2pq for    A \/a , and q 2 for a    \/a . A numerical example illustrates this concept. If we    assume that the frequency q of a recessive,    disease-causing allele is 1\/50, then p is 49\/50, the    frequency of homozygotes with the disease is q    2 =(1\/50)2 =1\/250, and the frequency of    heterozygotes is 2pq =249\/501\/50 , or    approximately 1\/25. Hence, for this example, we see that    heterozygotes are 100 times as frequent as disease sufferers,    and, as this ratio increases, the rarer the allele becomes. The    relation between heterozygotes and homozygotes recessive for a    rare allele is shown in the following illustration. Note that    the allele frequencies p and q can be used as the    gamete frequencies in    both sexes.  <\/p>\n<p>    The formation of an affected person usually depends on the    chance union of unrelated heterozygotes. However, inbreeding    (mating between relatives) increases the chance that a mating    will be between two heterozygotes. An example of a marriage    between cousins is shown in . Individuals III-5 and III-6 are    first cousins and produce two homozygotes for the rare    allele. You can see    from that an ancestor who is a heterozygote may    produce many descendants who also are heterozygotes. Hence two    cousins can carry the same rare recessive allele    inherited from a common ancestor. For two unrelated    persons to be heterozygous, they would have to inherit the rare    allele from both their families. Thus matings between    relatives generally run a higher risk of producing abnormal    phenotypes caused by homozygosity for recessive alleles than do    matings between nonrelatives. For this reason, first-cousin    marriages contribute a large proportion of the sufferers of    recessive diseases in the population.  <\/p>\n<p>        Pedigree of a rare recessive phenotype determined by a        recessive allele a . Gene symbols are normally not        included in pedigree charts, but genotypes are inserted        here for reference. Note that individuals II-1 and II-5        marry into the family; they are assumed (more...)      <\/p>\n<p>    What are some examples of human recessive disorders? PKU has    already served as an example of pedigree analysis, but    what kind of phenotype is it? PKU    is a disease of processing of the amino acid    phenylalanine, a component of all proteins in the food that we    eat. Phenylalanine is normally converted into tyrosine by the    enzyme phenylalanine    hydroxylase:  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK21977\/\" title=\"Human genetics - An Introduction to Genetic Analysis - NCBI ...\">Human genetics - An Introduction to Genetic Analysis - NCBI ...<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> In the study of rare disorders, four general patterns of inheritance are distinguishable by pedigree analysis: autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, X-linked recessive, and X-linked dominant. The affected phenotype of an autosomal recessive disorder is determined by a recessive allele, and the corresponding unaffected phenotype is determined by a dominant allele.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/human-genetics\/human-genetics-an-introduction-to-genetic-analysis-ncbi\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-human-genetics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21926"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21926"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21926\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}