{"id":21755,"date":"2014-01-17T07:45:31","date_gmt":"2014-01-17T12:45:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/illumina-says-new-dna-sequencer-delivers-a-human-genome-for-1000\/"},"modified":"2014-01-17T07:45:31","modified_gmt":"2014-01-17T12:45:31","slug":"illumina-says-new-dna-sequencer-delivers-a-human-genome-for-1000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/illumina-says-new-dna-sequencer-delivers-a-human-genome-for-1000\/","title":{"rendered":"Illumina Says New DNA Sequencer Delivers A Human Genome For $1000"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    San Diego, Calif.-based Illumina says its newest sequencing    platform, the HiSeq X Ten, is the first to break the $1,000    barrier for sequencing a humans genetic code. Its a benchmark    that many companies have been chasing since the Human Genome    Project succeeded in producing the first sequence in 2003 for a    mere $3 billion or so. And its a figure that has been seen as    one of the key steps on the road to making genome sequencing a    cost-effective option for widespread medical use.  <\/p>\n<p>    This platform was purpose-built to enable large    population-scale human genome sequencing, Joel Fellis, an    Illumina senior manager of product marketing, said in a phone    interview. Theres an explosion in demand [for this sort of    thing]; were approached quite frequently by nations and    centers looking to take on large-scale projects.  <\/p>\n<p>    The HiSeq X Ten is 10 HiSeqX machines put together, which    together can sequence up to 18,000 human genomes per year,    according to Illumina. The company says it can partially    sequence five human genomes within a day, and completely    sequence 16 human genomes within three days. The genomes are    sequenced on a standard called 30X, meaning that every letter    of the genetic code is read an average of 30 times. That    super-attentive kind of proofreading is essential, according to    Fellis.  <\/p>\n<p>    When you sequence a genome, you want to read each of the bases    more than once, Fellis says. Youre looking at how the genome    differs from a reference sequence, and to have confidence in    that, you need to read everything more than once.  <\/p>\n<p>    Fellis says that one of the key technical improvements in this    new model involves tweaks to the flow cell, a component that    looks kind of like a microscope slide, studded with very tiny    wells, where thousands of chemical reactions are performed in    parallel. There have also been breakthroughs on the chemistry    side that allow the machines to perform the reactions much    faster.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ultimately, we think the widespread availability of human    genomes is a good thing, Fellis says. It allows you to tie    genetic information back to the phenotype. You can imagine, if    you want to understand a complex disease like cancer, youd    need tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of sequences.  <\/p>\n<p>    Illumina isnt quite the first company to make a grab for the    $1,000 genome crown. Life Technologies Corp. said in January    2012 that its Ion Proton Sequencer would be achieving that goal    within a year. It was scheduled to put that claim to the test    last year in the Archon Genomics X Prize, which would have    awarded $10 million to a team that could sequence 100 human    genomes accurately within 30 days, at the cost of $1,000 per    sequence. But the contest was canceled last August    when organizers said innovation was already outpacing the aims    of the contest  indeed, the original rules laid out in 2006    set a cost goal of $10,000 per genome, which organizers revised in    2011 after seeing prices drop in the field.  <\/p>\n<p>    Also, theres a little bit of fine print when it comes to    Illuminas $1,000 cost breakdown. Nature points out that the    CEO Jay Flatleys $1,000-per-genome price pitch included the    cost of the chemical reagents needed to run the machine, a    portion of the initial price tag for the system (around $10    million), and pay for technicians who prepare samples and run    the machines. But theres some other overhead costs outside of    that figure, such as the electricity used to keep the    sequencers humming.  <\/p>\n<p>    It's a good deal if you can play in this game, Chad Nusbaum,    co-director of sequencing efforts at The Broad Institute of    Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard (which, along    with Seoul, Korea-based genomic services company Macrogen and    the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Australia, is one    of the first three HiSeq X Ten customers), told Nature. It's like the    high-stakes poker table: if you're playing $200 a chip, people    who can't afford those chips don't care.  <\/p>\n<p>    If you dont have $10 million to spare but still have a lot of    genomes to sequence, you may be interested in Illuminas other    new product, the NextSeq 500. The desktop-sized sequencer can    deliver one genome within a day, and it runs for a cool    $250,000.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ibtimes.com\/illumina-says-new-dna-sequencer-delivers-human-genome-1000-1542693\" title=\"Illumina Says New DNA Sequencer Delivers A Human Genome For $1000\">Illumina Says New DNA Sequencer Delivers A Human Genome For $1000<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> San Diego, Calif.-based Illumina says its newest sequencing platform, the HiSeq X Ten, is the first to break the $1,000 barrier for sequencing a humans genetic code. Its a benchmark that many companies have been chasing since the Human Genome Project succeeded in producing the first sequence in 2003 for a mere $3 billion or so.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/illumina-says-new-dna-sequencer-delivers-a-human-genome-for-1000\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21755"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}