{"id":21736,"date":"2014-01-17T07:41:53","date_gmt":"2014-01-17T12:41:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/woman-wearing-google-glass-found-not-guilty-of-distracted-driving\/"},"modified":"2014-01-17T07:41:53","modified_gmt":"2014-01-17T12:41:53","slug":"woman-wearing-google-glass-found-not-guilty-of-distracted-driving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/transhumanist\/woman-wearing-google-glass-found-not-guilty-of-distracted-driving\/","title":{"rendered":"Woman wearing Google Glass found not guilty of distracted driving"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    SAN DIEGO  A Temecula woman was found not guilty in traffic    court Thursday of a charge of distracted driving for wearing    Google Glass.  <\/p>\n<p>      San Diego Traffic Commissioner John Blair found that wearing      the computer-in-eyewear could be covered as distracted      driving by the traffic code, but police must prove that the      eyewear was on.    <\/p>\n<p>      Cecilia Abadie, 44, is believed to be the first driver in the      nation to have received such a ticket. Google Glass is not      yet on the market. Abadie is among those who are testing the      product nationwide, called Google Glass Explorers.    <\/p>\n<p>      On her Facebook page, Abadie thanked the people who had      followed her case and had supported her claim of innocence:      \"Yes, we can continue to be CYBORGS even when we drive! Happy      for all my fellow Glass Explorers that were anxiously waiting      for this decision.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      She was stopped by a California Highway Patrol officer Oct.      29 while driving north on Interstate 15 in northern San Diego      County.    <\/p>\n<p>      The officer issued the ticket as a violation of California      Vehicle Code 27602, which makes it a violation to drive a      vehicle \"if a television receiver, a video monitor, or a      television or video screen\" is visible. Bills are pending in      the legislatures of Delaware, New Jersey and West Virginia to      ban driving with Google Glass.    <\/p>\n<p>      Abadie's attorney had argued that since the California code      does not mention Google Glass, it could not be the basis of a      ticket. Blair rejected that reasoning.    <\/p>\n<p>      Abadie testified that the Google Glass was turned off.    <\/p>\n<p>      Blair also dismissed a speeding ticket for lack of evidence.      Abadie had been driving 80 mph in a 65-mph zone, according to      the ticket.    <\/p>\n<p>      On her Facebook page, Abadie says she has been a product      manager for Full Swing Golf Inc. of San Diego since 2005. On      her Twitter account, she describes herself as a \"glass      pioneer, geek, self-quantifier, transhumanist, blogger,      speaker, currently playing with fun new ways to a better      self.\"    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to see the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/latimes.com.feedsportal.com\/c\/34336\/f\/625246\/s\/3603796a\/sc\/21\/l\/0L0Slatimes0N0Clocal0Cla0Eme0Egoogle0Eglass0E20A140A1170H0A0H53473150Bstory0Dtrack0Frss\/story01.htm\" title=\"Woman wearing Google Glass found not guilty of distracted driving\">Woman wearing Google Glass found not guilty of distracted driving<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> SAN DIEGO A Temecula woman was found not guilty in traffic court Thursday of a charge of distracted driving for wearing Google Glass. San Diego Traffic Commissioner John Blair found that wearing the computer-in-eyewear could be covered as distracted driving by the traffic code, but police must prove that the eyewear was on.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/transhumanist\/woman-wearing-google-glass-found-not-guilty-of-distracted-driving\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-transhumanist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21736"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21736"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21736\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}