Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said in an interview aired Tuesday that judges make poor politicians, that he misses late Justice Antonin Scalia, and that the Second Amendment doesn't apply to a citizen keeping a gun next to their bed. <\/p>\n
In a wide-ranging interview with PBS' Charlie Rose, Breyer said he thought Chief Justice Roger Taney, who wrote the 1857Dred Scott v. Sandford decision that found blacks could not be American citizens, \"tried to be a politician.\" <\/p>\n
\"And he thought that -- perhaps he thought, that by reaching a decision saying a black person was not a person, that's roughly what he held, unbelievable. But, he thought he would help prevent the Civil War...if anything, he helped bring about the Civil War because Benjamin Curtis wrote a great dissent showing, I think, at the time, his decision was wrong. It's not using hindsight, but really wrong. Abraham Lincoln picked it up, read Taney's decision and said this is a shocker, then used the dissent in his speech at Cooper Union,\" Breyer noted. <\/p>\n
\"Which was the speech that propelled him to the head of the Republican Party, and helped get him the nomination and then all followed. He was really an abolitionist at heart. They knew that in the South and then, the Civil War followed,\" he added. \"So, if that was Taney's idea, he was wrong. Judges are not good politicians. They may have some exposure to politics, but that's what I mean when I say junior league.\" <\/p>\n
Breyer recalled Scalia being a masterful writer. \"The job of a judge in an appellate court is, in an opinion, to explain the reasons why he or she reached this opinion,\" he said. \"Now, I don't think that that calls for or requires what you might be able to do in terms of great phrasing but if you can do that, it can be an advantage. But what I meant because people -- when Nino and I use -- I miss him, I do.\" <\/p>\n
Breyer stressed that \"it's a big country\" with 320 million people who \"think a lot of different things,\" thus \"it is not such a terrible thing, if on the Supreme Court, there are people who have different, somewhat different jurisprudential outlooks.\" <\/p>\n
\"You know, Scalia probably likes rules more than I do. He tends to find clarity in trying to get a clear rule. I have probably more of a view that life is a mess,\" the justice said, adding that it comes down to \"basic outlook about the Constitution, how it applies today to people who must live under it.\" <\/p>\n
\"Those are where the differences come up. It's not politics.\" <\/p>\n
Breyer said people shouldn't look at the High Court as a political arbiter. \"It is not the Supreme Court that tells people what to do. [The Constitution] sets boundaries. We are, in a sense, the boundary commission,\" he said. \"...But don't make the mistake of confusing a tough question at the boundary with the fact about what the document is like, because the document leaves vast space in between the boundaries for people themselves through the ballot box to decide what cities, towns, states, what kind of a nation they want. That's what this foresees, and if you do not participate, it won't work.\" <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the original post: Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said in an interview aired Tuesday that judges make poor politicians, that he misses late Justice Antonin Scalia, and that the Second Amendment doesn't apply to a citizen keeping a gun next to their bed. In a wide-ranging interview with PBS' Charlie Rose, Breyer said he thought Chief Justice Roger Taney, who wrote the 1857Dred Scott v. Continue reading
\nBreyer: Second Amendment Not About 'the Right of an Individual to Keep a Gun Next to His Bed' - PJ Media<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"