Photo Joshua Wong during an October 2014 protest outside the offices of Hong Kongs chief executive. Credit Tyrone Siu\/Reuters <\/p>\n
To the Editor: <\/p>\n
Re Three Young Voices Versus a Superpower (editorial, Aug. 15): <\/p>\n
The three students were convicted because their disorderly and intimidating behavior broke the law during a protest. They were found guilty based on evidence presented in a fair and open trial. <\/p>\n
Under Hong Kongs common law legal system, like others around the world, both the prosecution and the convicted can seek an appeal of sentence. The court will consider the case independently, fairly and openly. There is simply no basis to imply that political motive or the students political views are the reason for the appeal. <\/p>\n
Freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are protected in Hong Kongs Basic Law, our constitutional document, and underpinned by the rule of law and an independent judiciary. Hong Kongs judicial independence is ranked eighth globally by the World Economic Forum (the United States is 29th). <\/p>\n
Your eagerness to label the alleged kidnapping case of Howard Lam, a member of Hong Kongs Democratic Party, as a brazen crackdown is also wide of the mark. Independent journalists have published evidence that contradicts his allegations. Mr. Lam has since been arrested on suspicion of misleading the police by false information. <\/p>\n
CLEMENT LEUNG, WASHINGTON <\/p>\n
The writer is Hong Kongs commissioner to the United States. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the rest here: Photo Joshua Wong during an October 2014 protest outside the offices of Hong Kongs chief executive. Credit Tyrone Siu\/Reuters To the Editor: Re Three Young Voices Versus a Superpower (editorial, Aug. 15): The three students were convicted because their disorderly and intimidating behavior broke the law during a protest. Continue reading
\nFree Speech and Assembly in Hong Kong - New York Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"