{"id":211813,"date":"2017-08-15T11:53:27","date_gmt":"2017-08-15T15:53:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/commentary-the-dangerous-new-threat-to-gun-ownership-gun-violence-taxes-elko-daily-free-press\/"},"modified":"2017-08-15T11:53:27","modified_gmt":"2017-08-15T15:53:27","slug":"commentary-the-dangerous-new-threat-to-gun-ownership-gun-violence-taxes-elko-daily-free-press","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/commentary-the-dangerous-new-threat-to-gun-ownership-gun-violence-taxes-elko-daily-free-press\/","title":{"rendered":"Commentary: The dangerous new threat to gun ownership: &#8216;Gun Violence Taxes&#8217; &#8211; Elko Daily Free Press"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Thanks to a tortured ruling by the Washington State Supreme      Court, there is a dangerous new threat to gun ownership.    <\/p>\n<p>      Its called a gun violence tax and Washingtons high court      sided with the City of Seattle, which adopted such a tax in      2015 in a gun control strategy to slither around the      34-year-old state preemption law that placed exclusive      authority for regulating firearms in the hands of the State      Legislature.    <\/p>\n<p>      This gun tax violates the legislative intent of statewide      uniformity by taxing law-abiding gun owners inside the city,      and the retailers who cater to them. In Seattles case, the      tax is $25 on the sale of each firearm, plus two to five      cents for each round of ammunition sold.    <\/p>\n<p>      This threat takes on even more sinister dimensions when one      considers the potential for cities to simply up the fee.      Seattle started with $25 per gun, but what if they want to      raise that to $100, $500 or even $1,000? It opens the door      wide to making gun ownership prohibitively expensive for      average citizens. Essentially, Washingtons Supreme Court      just handed the gun prohibition lobby and its allies in      government a new strategy: If they cant ban or regulate gun      ownership out of existence, they will simply tax it into      oblivion.    <\/p>\n<p>      The ruling creates a new battleground for groups like the      National Rifle Association, Second Amendment Foundation,      Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and      the National Shooting Sports Foundation.    <\/p>\n<p>      Count on this: Municipal city and county governments      controlled by anti-gun liberal politicians will be eyeballing      such taxes in their own communities. They may say the revenue      will be used for gun violence research or prevention      programs, but in reality this is to finance gun control, and      they know it. Such taxes penalize honest gun owners and use      their money to conduct questionable research with the      ultimate goal of using the findings of such research to      support additional restrictions on their Second Amendment      right to keep and bear arms.    <\/p>\n<p>      Daniel Webster is credited with observing that The power to      tax is the power to destroy. This should alarm any civil      rights activist because now there may be nothing to prevent      placing similar taxes on the exercise of other rights. If      this case were about anything other than firearms, one could      certainly wonder if the court would have come down on the      citys side.    <\/p>\n<p>      Why not put a special tax on freedom of speech or the press?      How about we slap a special tax on abortions? Once the door      is open to government to institute a tax on one right, there      is nothing to prevent the same government from pursuing other      taxes on other rights. One thing government is good at is      levying taxes.    <\/p>\n<p>      Currently, only Seattle and Cook County, Illinois which      encompasses Chicago, have instituted gun violence taxes.      Thousands of local governments have been carefully watching      this case so that they could use the Washington ruling to      launch their own financial infringements on the exercise of a      civil right.    <\/p>\n<p>      The Washington State ruling is a shot fueled by judicial      activism across the bow of every American gun owner who has      heretofore refrained from voting on local judges and state      supreme court candidates. Elections do matter, now more than      ever. When the highest court in any state gives the nod to      taxing the exercise of a fundamental civil right, it plows      dangerous new ground and plants legal landmines in its wake.    <\/p>\n<p>    Alan Gottlieb is founder and executive vice president of the    Second Amendment Foundation. Dave Workman is senior editor of    TheGunMag.com.       <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/elkodaily.com\/opinion\/columnists\/commentary-the-dangerous-new-threat-to-gun-ownership-gun-violence\/article_bb358a10-1099-5577-a335-3eb07f46ab75.html\" title=\"Commentary: The dangerous new threat to gun ownership: 'Gun Violence Taxes' - Elko Daily Free Press\">Commentary: The dangerous new threat to gun ownership: 'Gun Violence Taxes' - Elko Daily Free Press<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Thanks to a tortured ruling by the Washington State Supreme Court, there is a dangerous new threat to gun ownership. Its called a gun violence tax and Washingtons high court sided with the City of Seattle, which adopted such a tax in 2015 in a gun control strategy to slither around the 34-year-old state preemption law that placed exclusive authority for regulating firearms in the hands of the State Legislature. This gun tax violates the legislative intent of statewide uniformity by taxing law-abiding gun owners inside the city, and the retailers who cater to them.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/commentary-the-dangerous-new-threat-to-gun-ownership-gun-violence-taxes-elko-daily-free-press\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211813"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211813\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}