{"id":211742,"date":"2017-08-14T12:35:36","date_gmt":"2017-08-14T16:35:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/dutton-retreats-on-offshore-detention-secrecy-rules-that-threaten-workers-with-jail-the-guardian\/"},"modified":"2017-08-14T12:35:36","modified_gmt":"2017-08-14T16:35:36","slug":"dutton-retreats-on-offshore-detention-secrecy-rules-that-threaten-workers-with-jail-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/dutton-retreats-on-offshore-detention-secrecy-rules-that-threaten-workers-with-jail-the-guardian\/","title":{"rendered":"Dutton retreats on offshore detention secrecy rules that threaten workers with jail &#8211; The Guardian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  The immigration minister, Peter Dutton, says he will clarify  the Turnbull governments offshore detention centre secrecy  provisions. Photograph: Dean Lewins\/EPA<\/p>\n<p>    The Turnbull government has moved to water down secrecy    provisions that threaten workers in Australias offshore    detention centres with two years prison if they speak out about    abuse or neglect.  <\/p>\n<p>    The immigration minister, Peter Dutton, has put forward    amendments to the 2015 Australian Border Force Act that    will make it easier for social workers, lawyers, nurses and    security guards working in Australias offshore detention    centres to talk publicly about the shocking treatment of    refugees without being jailed.  <\/p>\n<p>    Refugee advocates say it represents a stunning backdown on the    governments controversial legislation, arguing the government    is only doing so because it is in the middle    of a high court challenge against the legislation that it    knows it will lose.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Dutton says his amendments simply aim to clarify the    intent of the governments original legislation  to stop the    unauthorised disclosure of information that could harm the    national or public interest.  <\/p>\n<p>    It effectively waters down the bill, Dr Barri Phatarfod from    Doctors 4 Refugees told Guardian Australia. Dutton and his    office argue that it clarifies the intention of the bill,    which may well be the case ... but its taken over two years    for him to clarify something that he wasnt unaware of.  <\/p>\n<p>    Heads of various peak medical and other professional bodies    have been appealing to him since [the legislation was    introduced in 2015].  <\/p>\n<p>    Lawyers from the Fitzroy Legal Service, working on behalf of    Doctors 4 Refugees, filed a case in the high court last year,    challenging section 42  the secrecy provision  of the    Border Force    Act.  <\/p>\n<p>    Section    42 carries a two-year jail term for any entrusted person     anybody who works within the immigration detention system     who makes an unauthorised disclosure about conditions in the    camps.  <\/p>\n<p>    They argued the controversial legislation had compromised, and    potentially criminalised, the actions of doctors who were only    seeking to advance their patients interests by speaking out    publicly on behalf of the refugees and asylum seekers they    treated.<\/p>\n<p>    The Turnbull government subsequently removed health    professionals from the definition of immigration and border    protection workers but the groups have not dropped the high    court challenge.  <\/p>\n<p>    Phatarfod said doctors cannot treat refugees properly if    non-health professionals  such as teachers, cleaners, and    security guards  are unable to report or share information    about refugees because they fear that they, too, could be    jailed.  <\/p>\n<p>    Duttons amendments mean the secrecy provision will now be    refined to only apply to information that may compromise    Australias security, defence or international relations,    interfere with the investigation of offences, or affect    sensitive personal and commercial matters.  <\/p>\n<p>    The amendments will apply retrospectively, dating back to 1    July 2015 when the Border Force Act was enacted.  <\/p>\n<p>    The retrospective application of the bill will provide the    necessary certainty that only information which could harm the    national or public interest, if disclosed, is to be protected,    and will be regarded as ever having been protected, under the    ABF act, Dutton    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    This will reassure individuals who may otherwise believe they    have committed an offence, in circumstances which would not    have amounted to an offence under these amendments.  <\/p>\n<p>    This bill will clarify the intent and refine the operation of    the secrecy and disclosure provisions that govern the    management of information in my portfolio.  <\/p>\n<p>    It illustrates the fine balance that must be struck in    protecting sensitive information while upholding a commitment    to open and accountable government.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/australia-news\/2017\/aug\/14\/dutton-retreats-on-offshore-detention-secrecy-rules-that-threaten-workers-with-jail\" title=\"Dutton retreats on offshore detention secrecy rules that threaten workers with jail - The Guardian\">Dutton retreats on offshore detention secrecy rules that threaten workers with jail - The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The immigration minister, Peter Dutton, says he will clarify the Turnbull governments offshore detention centre secrecy provisions.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/dutton-retreats-on-offshore-detention-secrecy-rules-that-threaten-workers-with-jail-the-guardian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187814],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211742","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-offshore"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211742"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211742"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211742\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}