Its all going off in the US, thats for sure. But something that has been bugging me, and many others, is the use of the term alt-right. This seems to be aterm to describe the rise of the right amongst social media and popular culture that we have seen over the last ten years or so. What this does, however, is lend an air of credibility to the views, people and outlets that is unwarranted. <\/p>\n
The intro on Wikipediais perhaps worth posting here: <\/p>\n
Thealt-right, oralternative right, is a loosely defined group ofpeoplewithfar-rightideologieswho rejectmainstream conservatismin favor ofwhite nationalism, principally in theUnited States, but also to a lesser degree inCanadaandEurope.[1][2][3][4]Paul Gottfriedis the first person to use the term alternative right, when referring specifically to developments within American right-wing politics, in 2008.[5]The term has since gained wide currency with the rise of the so-called alt-right.White supremacist[6]Richard Spencercoined the term in 2010 in reference to a movement centered onwhite nationalism, and has been accused by some media publications of doing so to excuse overtracism,white supremacism, andneo-Nazism.[1][7]The term drew considerable media attention and controversy during and after the2016 US presidential election.[8] <\/p>\n
Alt-rightbeliefshave been described asisolationist,protectionist,antisemitic, and white supremacist,[9][10][11]frequently overlapping withNeo-Nazism,[12][13][14]nativismandIslamophobia,[15][16][17][18][19]antifeminismandhomophobia,[12][20][21][22]right-wing populism,[23][24]and theneoreactionary movement.[9][25]The concept has further been associated with multiple groups fromAmerican nationalists, neo-monarchists,mens rights advocates, and the2016 presidential campaignofDonald Trump.[15][24][25][26][27] <\/p>\n
The alt-right has its roots onInternetwebsitessuch as4chanand8chan, where anonymous members create and useInternet memesto express their ideologies.[9][14][28]It is difficult to tell how much of what people write in these venues is serious and how much is intended to provoke outrage.[23][29]Members of the alt-right use websites likeAlternative Right,Twitter,Breitbart, andRedditto convey their message.[30][31]Alt-right postings generally support Donald Trump[32][33][34][35]and opposeimmigration,multiculturalismandpolitical correctness.[13][20][36] <\/p>\n
The alt-right has also had a significant influence on conservative thought in the United States, such as theSailer Strategyfor winning political support, along with having close ties to theTrump Administration. It has been listed as a key reason for Trumps win in the 2016 election.[37][38]The Trump administration includes several figures who are associated with the alt-right, such as White House Chief StrategistSteve Bannon.[39]In 2016, Bannon described Breitbart as the platform for the alt-right, with the goal of promoting the ideology.[40] <\/p>\n
This reminds me of how UKIP ended up coming to prominence its a sort of evolution of ideas. I wrote about this back in 2014: <\/p>\n
And what happened was this. UKIP busted the political landscape apart. They stole votes off most everyone and they went from zero to, well, hero in one night. <\/p>\n
But how can a party which is effectively predicated upon fear of the foreigner and thinly, so very thinly, veiled racism become so successful in such a short time? This is my theory. <\/p>\n
Firstly, there is the power of themere exposure effect. This is the fundamental concept of advertising whereby the brain finds things acceptable or even desirable through merely being exposed to the ideas. The more exposed, the more acceptable. UKIP have had a tremendous amount of airtime, with leader Nigel Farage doing the rounds on panel shows, radio shows and many news items. This is how creationism has prevailed, using the Wedge Strategy to get a foot in the door, get airtime, social media time, oxygen. That oxygen facilitates acceptability and then desirability. That was one of the arguments against having Bill Nye argue against Ken Ham about creationism. <\/p>\n
Secondly, their success comes down to the evolution of ideas. Memetics is the theory that ideas are analagous to the evolution of biological organisms, with success of the organism surviving in its environment most successfully when it adapts characteristics to its environment. This survivability works just as well with ideas. Ideas which prevail have survival mechanisms and adapt to their environments. Think Christianity here. It has thoroughly evolved over 2000 years to adapt to society, morality, technology and economics. Islam, on the other hand, has developed the characteristic of threatening apostates with death. That works well, too. <\/p>\n
Well, the history of the far right in Britain has gone from the National Front through to being reinvented into the British National Party (BNP) through to another reinvention (though the BNP still exist) in the form of UKIP (UKIPers might not like that realisation). What was going on in the early days of the right-wing extremist movement was that the ideas were not adapting well enough to the environments; they were too distasteful. The right-wing extremist ideology was just too much in the National Front to gather any traction with the general public. Then the BNP came along, and tried to be more respectable and appeal more widely. Some might say it was a slightly more (!) chilled version of the NF, appealing to more of the wider population. Ideas adapting. But still not becoming successful or acceptable enough. <\/p>\n
And then UKIP, with its pseudo-political approach of getting out of Europe, has finally nailed it. Its just acceptable enough for people to not be afraid of saying in public, Yeah, I voted UKIP. I think we need to get out of Europe as a way of saying, Yeah, Polish, Romanian and those sodding Muslims can do one! <\/p>\n
Now I didnt want to caricatureallUKIP voters in this way, but I stand by the idea that UKIP became the acceptable face of racism and xenophobia, playing into peoples fears. <\/p>\n
In the same way, in the US, media outlets like Breitbart, TheBlaze, Circa, The Daily Caller and any other number of outlets are presenting themselves as fertile ground out of which confidence and brazen admitting of nefarious view can bear fruit. It is little surprise, then, that after years of allowing such outletsfree reign to spread their hate, the hate manifests itself in real ways. Thats the regrettable corollary of freedom of speech. <\/p>\n
The terrible sights of Charlottesville over the last few days show that the old school far right has not died off, but has been simmering, and some have renamed it the alt-right. This merely disguises the ugly reality of the traditional far right and dresses it up in an air of acceptability and modern credibility. <\/p>\n
This is unwarranted. <\/p>\n
Dont be fooled by new-fangled terminology. The is the far right, and so many of these outlets peddle such extremist views. <\/p>\n
I am disheartened by the sheer scope and spread of such views and how they have been able to gain footholds in modern popular culture. The internet is great, but it also houses torrents of distaste and hate. <\/p>\n
Alt-right? Nah. Its still the far right, the dangerous extreme. Lets not give it more oxygen than it deserves. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See original here:<\/p>\n
Alt-Right? No, the Far Right. - Patheos (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Its all going off in the US, thats for sure. But something that has been bugging me, and many others, is the use of the term alt-right. This seems to be aterm to describe the rise of the right amongst social media and popular culture that we have seen over the last ten years or so Continue reading