{"id":211533,"date":"2017-08-13T02:35:48","date_gmt":"2017-08-13T06:35:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/the-week-in-tv-eden-paradise-lost-citizen-jane-utopia-in-search-of-the-dream-trust-me-diana-in-her-own-words-the-guardian\/"},"modified":"2017-08-13T02:35:48","modified_gmt":"2017-08-13T06:35:48","slug":"the-week-in-tv-eden-paradise-lost-citizen-jane-utopia-in-search-of-the-dream-trust-me-diana-in-her-own-words-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-utopia\/the-week-in-tv-eden-paradise-lost-citizen-jane-utopia-in-search-of-the-dream-trust-me-diana-in-her-own-words-the-guardian\/","title":{"rendered":"The week in TV: Eden: Paradise Lost; Citizen Jane; Utopia: In Search of the Dream; Trust Me; Diana: In Her Own Words &#8211; The Guardian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  His own worst enemy: Anton, a participant in Channel 4s Eden.  Photograph: C4<\/p>\n<p>    Eden: Paradise Lost (C4) | All    4    Citizen Jane (BBC4) | iPlayer    Utopia: In Search of the Dream (BBC4) |    iPlayer    Trust Me (BBC1) | iPlayer    Diana: In Her Own Words (C4) | All    4Eden, the Channel 4    year-long reality experiment in the wilds of Scotland that    famously went wildly wrong, suddenly resurfaced in a week-long    coda, Paradise Lost, in which the    producers sought to excuse their mistakes by giving us more of    the same: inanity, truculence, the milk of human kindness    openly curdling. It was a grim watch, made brief fun only by    our knowledge that the contestants emerged from their months of    fame-seeking to discover the show had long been cancelled: more    of Britain had watched Cash in the Attic. Chief    problem was apparently that, as one of the women said, it    turned into just a penis size matching competition.  <\/p>\n<p>    It has been said more succinctly, but we knew what she meant.    The main swinging dicks were Titch, presumably named for the    breadth of his non-swearing vocabulary, and Anton, a lumbering,    infuriating soul and his own worst enemy: every hour last week    I was waiting to see Anton decked.  <\/p>\n<p>      Here was a generation brought up to believe in their right to      believe in themselves, if not actually be good at anything    <\/p>\n<p>    Given my feelings of depression and boredom  and that was only    in three or four nights watching  goodness knows what it was    like for the participants. There was some revolting misogyny,    but there was also some savage incompetence. A hunter who    couldnt hunt, a gardener who couldnt weed, a chef who seemed    only to plunge knives into peoples backs. No one  count them,    none  appeared to take more than the briefest of seconds, in a    whole almost-year, to drink in the beauty of the Ardnamurchan    peninsula, fresh startled every morning, or to read half a    book, or teach others about anything.  <\/p>\n<p>    Here was a generation brought up to believe in their    inalienable right to believe in themselves, if not to be    actually good at anything, who, for all their easy talk of    democracy, had forgotten how to count the very thing, as    witnessed in the shoddy voting-out of Anton. By the end I just    felt sorry for the midges.  <\/p>\n<p>    Far more instructive, hopeful even, in terms of a slice of    paradise on Earth was Citizen Jane, a masterly    film on the battle for the soul of a city. New York, as it    happens, and a battle fought from the 30s to the 70s, but it    encapsulated much of the soul of the 20th century.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the one hand, city developer Robert Moses, in increasing    thrall to the automobile, and the utopian blandishments of    Corbusian modernism. On the other, Jane    Jacobs, a phenomenally articulate writer. Her every    sentence sang off the screen: Projects that are truly marvels    of dullness and regimentation, sealed against any buoyancy or    vitality of city life civic centres that are avoided by anyone    except bums.  <\/p>\n<p>    Jacobs understood, viscerally in the main but also through    exhaustive empirical research, that cities cannot be built    top-down, by even well-intentioned gods (and here I was minded    of the soaraway success of SimCity). Buildings that turn their backs on    the streets; expressways that eviscerate. She went to war    against Moses and his armies, arguing instead for short blocks,    myriad channels, a mix of old and new buildings, constant    connections with neighbourhoods. Jacobss mantra was: There is    no logic that can be superimposed: people make the city.  <\/p>\n<p>    There was great footage of Little Italy in 1962: flashing-eyed    women arguing that the streets were immensely safer there.    Two-three in the morning, the men are sitting in the cafes and    theyre watching for you. And there were grim lessons    from 50s slum resettlement in Baltimore, the replacing of    neighbourhoods with sanitised architectural housing projects    that had turned within nine years into some of the most    dangerous places in the world. We saw, in turn, their    late 90s demolition: literally, a bonfire of the vanities.    China is currently engaged in Brobdingnagian urban expansion    and has decided its template will be exactly that failed 1950s    American model.  <\/p>\n<p>    BBC4 is also giving us a highly promising three-parter,    Utopia: In Search of the    Dream, and art historian Richard Clay has already    managed, without straining, to link Thomas Spences commons    of shared ownership, via George Bernard Shaw and Star    Treks Gene Roddenberry, directly to Wikipedia. Its    intellectually splendid. We saw a flash-forward to this weeks    second episode, and a keen-eyed young black architect    enthusing: We are declaring war on the slums! The words of    Robert Moses, 80years on.  <\/p>\n<p>    I almost stopped watching TrustMe, BBC1s new    four-part drama, 10 minutes in, when the already semi-daft plot    dunked its head into simple medical ignorance. Jodie    Whittakers angelic if stroppy nurse Cath, trying to expose    hospital abuses in Sheffield, is given her perfunctory jotters:    shamed and angry, she (somewhat inexplicably) decides to steal    her best pals identity, pretend to be a full doctor and gets a    whizzy new job in Edinburgh. Shes welcomed north with more    friendship, and certainly a greater lack of    credential-checking, than greeted the announcement of the    actress as the    next Doctor Who.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sharon Small is Brigitte, Caths stressy new Scots boss, and    wonders: So why here? This place is a backward step, surely?    this isnt exactly a centre of excellence.  <\/p>\n<p>      Diana was not a republican (the clue coming in the fact that      she wanted her son to be king)    <\/p>\n<p>    Say what? It gave its name  the Edinburgh Model  to global    teaching systems: its graduates founded five of the seven Ivy    League medical schools. The storyline was fullof such    sillies. The Sheffield reporter who insisted that Cath    herselfgo public and personal (absolutely no need) with    her whistleblowing, and thus lost the story; the absurd ease    with which Cath multitasks upheaval, a daughter, a new affair    and speed-reading Surgery for Dummies from her gown pocket: if    a patient arrived in A&E up here boasting as many plot    holes, theyd be borrowed for a string vest.  <\/p>\n<p>    They might just seem surface sillies, but Ill warrant a writer    such as Jed Mercurio would have taken better chances to tell    more sober truths aboutwhistleblowing, along with the    drama. Yet Ill stick with it, mainly to see if the plot    manages to extricate itself from the roils of its own entrails    and to enjoy a good cast.  <\/p>\n<p>    What did we learn from Diana: In Her Own Words?    Barring a couple of swipes at those who cant answer back, and    the fact that such shows will resort to much padding, and that    the exceedingly posh and coy Diana was, despite strident claims    from the misguided, not a republican (the clue coming    in the fact that she wanted her son to be king), Id have to    say a big fat jack. What learned, though, from the weeks of    hissy furore between Channel 4s right to broadcast private    recordings of Diana, and her sons rights to a quiet life?    Those twin British failings  a capacity for self-deception and    love of deference  are alive and kicking today: it might be    2017 rather than 1953, but millennialsare keen to bend    the knee anew.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/tv-and-radio\/2017\/aug\/13\/eden-citizen-jane-utopia-trust-me-diana-observer-tv-review\" title=\"The week in TV: Eden: Paradise Lost; Citizen Jane; Utopia: In Search of the Dream; Trust Me; Diana: In Her Own Words - The Guardian\">The week in TV: Eden: Paradise Lost; Citizen Jane; Utopia: In Search of the Dream; Trust Me; Diana: In Her Own Words - The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> His own worst enemy: Anton, a participant in Channel 4s Eden. Photograph: C4 Eden: Paradise Lost (C4) | All 4 Citizen Jane (BBC4) | iPlayer Utopia: In Search of the Dream (BBC4) | iPlayer Trust Me (BBC1) | iPlayer Diana: In Her Own Words (C4) | All 4Eden, the Channel 4 year-long reality experiment in the wilds of Scotland that famously went wildly wrong, suddenly resurfaced in a week-long coda, Paradise Lost, in which the producers sought to excuse their mistakes by giving us more of the same: inanity, truculence, the milk of human kindness openly curdling. It was a grim watch, made brief fun only by our knowledge that the contestants emerged from their months of fame-seeking to discover the show had long been cancelled: more of Britain had watched Cash in the Attic <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-utopia\/the-week-in-tv-eden-paradise-lost-citizen-jane-utopia-in-search-of-the-dream-trust-me-diana-in-her-own-words-the-guardian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187819],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-utopia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211533"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211533\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}