{"id":211351,"date":"2017-08-11T18:29:57","date_gmt":"2017-08-11T22:29:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/president-trump-needs-to-go-to-the-moon-foreign-policy-blog\/"},"modified":"2017-08-11T18:29:57","modified_gmt":"2017-08-11T22:29:57","slug":"president-trump-needs-to-go-to-the-moon-foreign-policy-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/space-exploration\/president-trump-needs-to-go-to-the-moon-foreign-policy-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"President Trump Needs to Go to the Moon &#8211; Foreign Policy (blog)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    In just two years, the United States will celebrate the    anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing, an event that    perhaps more than any other represents the American will and    capacity to achieve the seemingly impossible. This year,    however, we will celebrate a less auspicious anniversary  in    December it will have been 45 years since the last man set foot    on the Moon, ushering in a long era of diminished American    ambitions in space. In recent years, presidential    administrations have debated whether Americans should return to    the Moon or set their sights on Mars.  <\/p>\n<p>    But as President Donald Trump devises his strategy for space    exploration  which he has     described as essential to our character as a nationour    economy, and our great nations security  he should reject    this choice as a false one. To sustainably reinvigorate our    human spaceflight program, we should use the Moon as a stepping    stone to Mars and beyond, while spreading costs and spurring    innovation by maximizing opportunities for commercial and    international involvement.  <\/p>\n<p>    While most U.S. government activities in space, and the lions    share of the space budget, are focused on military programs,    human spaceflight remains the programs lodestone. Every    president in recent memory has sought to stir the popular    imagination and  hoping to channel JFK  associate himself    with big, bold thinking by announcing ambitious goals for    manned spaceflight.  <\/p>\n<p>    For President Barack Obama, that goal was sending men to Mars    by the 2030s.He dismissed President George W. Bushs goal    of returning Americans to the Moon, stating that we had been    there (and presumably done that).He cancelled Bushs        Constellation spacecraft program, replacing it with the    Space    Launch System (SLS).The SLS would be the United    States heaviest-ever rocket, meant to send humans farther than    ever before.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yet the reality of Americas manned space program has been more    pedestrian than presidential rhetoric would suggest. NASAs    budget has been essentially flat since the 1990s. The United    States has lacked the capability of putting an astronaut in    orbit since the last Space Shuttle flight in 2011, instead    buying seats on Russian Soyuz flights. And while we are quietly    living through a golden age of space science  our     unmanned probes have returned spectacular images and    invaluable data  our manned missions have been limited to    flights back and forth to the International Space Station, due    to be decommissioned in three years.  <\/p>\n<p>    Obama wasnt the first to call for manned flights to    Mars.President George H.W. Bush articulated a similar    plan, which envisioned placing an American astronaut on the Red    Planet by 2019. But Congress blanched at the price tag, and the    plan was shelved. Today, just as then, the technical challenges    of reaching Mars might be less daunting than the challenge of    devising a political and budgetary path for reaching new    frontiers in space.  <\/p>\n<p>    Achieving our next big human spaceflight breakthroughs will    require more than a stirring speech; it will require a plan    designed to be sustainable over the long term by maximizing    public support while minimizing the burden on NASA. Today,    funding for NASA represents just 0.5 percent of the federal    budget, compared to over 4 percent at the height of the Apollo    program; there will be no return to those levels.  <\/p>\n<p>    A realistic plan would not abandon the    idea of a manned mission to Mars, but would aim first to return    humans to the Moon for prolonged periods. A return to    the Moon offers several advantages.Most obviously, it can    be accomplished faster and at less cost than a straight shot to    Mars.And while it involves considerable risk, the shorter    distance and our own prior experience means that risk will be    lower than with a Martian voyage.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whats more, the costs and risks of a mission to the Moon can    be shared with international partners. Even as we have turned    our focus to Mars, the European Space Agency, Japan, and others    have taken an increased interest in manned lunar missions. A    renewed focus on the Moon would significantly enhance our    opportunities for international collaboration and    burden-sharing, and would also prevent Russia or China  both    of which have their own lunar aspirations  from supplanting    us.  <\/p>\n<p>    A shift in NASAs focus to the Moon could also be accompanied    by a greater role for private firms in low-earth    orbit.The commercial space industry has developed at a    rapid pace since the United States last penned a vision for    space exploration. Any new space strategy should seek to    capitalize on these developments by shifting more routine tasks    (a relative term in space operations, to be sure) to private    operators while freeing NASA to focus on higher-end activities    focused on the Moon and deep space.  <\/p>\n<p>    If we were successful in returning humans to the Moon, it could    serve as a stepping stone for a manned mission to Mars or even    more ambitious goals.Practically speaking, lunar missions    would provide astronauts with experience in extended habitation    of an alien world. The Moon even holds the potential for    eventually serving as a staging ground for missions further    out. Just as importantly, successful lunar missions would    likely invigorate public and political support in the United    States and overseas for space exploration, helping to sustain    the attention and funding required for future steps into space.  <\/p>\n<p>    President Trump has promised to restore Americas proud legacy    of leadership in space. If he is to make good on that pledge,    he must address not only where we are going but map out how,    amid declining budgets and competing priorities, we plan to get    there.  <\/p>\n<p>    Photo credit: Getty Images\/Foreign    Policy illustration  <\/p>\n<p>        Twitter Facebook Google + Reddit      <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/foreignpolicy.com\/2017\/08\/11\/president-trump-needs-to-go-to-the-moon\/\" title=\"President Trump Needs to Go to the Moon - Foreign Policy (blog)\">President Trump Needs to Go to the Moon - Foreign Policy (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> In just two years, the United States will celebrate the anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing, an event that perhaps more than any other represents the American will and capacity to achieve the seemingly impossible.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/space-exploration\/president-trump-needs-to-go-to-the-moon-foreign-policy-blog\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187764],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-space-exploration"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211351"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211351"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211351\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}