{"id":211220,"date":"2017-08-11T18:01:07","date_gmt":"2017-08-11T22:01:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/muslims-and-modernism-kasmir-monitor\/"},"modified":"2017-08-11T18:01:07","modified_gmt":"2017-08-11T22:01:07","slug":"muslims-and-modernism-kasmir-monitor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/rationalism\/muslims-and-modernism-kasmir-monitor\/","title":{"rendered":"Muslims and Modernism &#8211; Kasmir Monitor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The nineteenth century witnessed a great change in the outlook    of Muslims of the Subcontinent. Colonialism, along with the    development of scientific attitude, affected the religious    universe drastically. And, this, in turn, led to a hot debate    on religious dogmas and rationality; rather a paradigm shift    in the thought of educated Muslims. This shift created a    modernist school, comprised mainly of those Muslims who showed    a keen receptiveness to western institutions of learning and    who judged things through the prism of modernity.    This intellectual vibrancy took place in a more enthusiastic    and radical way around the person of Sir Syed Ahmad khan, who    was born in Delhi in 1817. To make the re-conciliation between    religion and western attitude was central to his religious    philosophy. He started a famous periodical Tahdhib al-Akhlaq    and set up a scientific society for translating English books    into Urdu so that the Muslims of the subcontinent would get    acquainted with the advanced\/progressive ideas of the West.    While expounding the belief in naturalism, he stated, Today    we are in need of modern Ilm al Kalam by which we should    refute the dogmas of modern Science or show that they are in    conformity with the Islamic creeds. According to him, whole    physical universe including man is the work of God and religion    is His word, so there cant be any contradiction between the    two. The only touchstone of a real religion can be this: if it    is in conformity with human nature or with nature in general,    then it is true and real.    Like the modernists of Christian world, he too tried to    relinquish the metaphysical realities from the realm of faith.    Reason and empiricism, according to him, are the only    yardsticks to measure the reality. Swathed with the ideas of    rationalism, he maintained that there is no intermediary    between God and the prophet(SAW). Gabriel is in reality a    symbolic representation of the prophetic faculty.    Eschatologically, he further maintained that paradise and hell    described in a sensuous terms in the sacred text are just    emblematical representation of the psychological states of    individuals in the life after death. Ibn Khuldun, a great    Muslim historian and thinker, dealt well with the people like    Sir Syed who were the preachers of rationalism during medieval    era and has rightly mentioned in his famous Muqadimah that    the mind is an accurate scale, whose recordings are certain and    reliable; but to use it to weigh questions relating to the    unity of God, or after life, or nature of prophecy or other    such subjects falling outside its range, is like trying to use    a goldsmiths scale to weigh mountains.    To reconstruct the edifice of Muslim civilization, Sir Syed    strongly advocated the ijtihadic endeavour. Apart from trying    to untie the cosmic knots with reason and science, his    buttressing to nullify Taqlid was very energetic and    progressive. Taqlid is the sole reason, according to him,    for the downfall of Muslim Ummah. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan not only    started a sort of neo-Muttazilite understanding of the cosmos    and the sacred text but also endeavoured to dilute the    antagonistic attitude of western colonials. To meet this end,    he dedicated himself to write an exegesis of the Bible in the    light of Islamic intellectualism. Tabayin al-Kalam fi Tafsir    al-Torahwa al-injilalamillahal-Islam is the name of that    exegesis. It is not a commentary in a sense of Muslim Tafsir of    the Quran. It is a collection of critical essays on certain    aspects of Christianity that tends to stress the common ground    rather than the differences between the Christians and Muslims.    The main contention of Sir Syed, as Syed MunirWasti would put    it, is that there is no fundamental difference between the    account of Christianity given in the Bible and that given in    the Quran.    The Muslim society in India was very much hesitant to get    socially intermingled with Christians. In order to dismantle    this social barrier, he wrote a booklet, entitled    Ahkam-iTaam-i Ahli-Kitab, to explain that Muslim Jurisprudence    doesnt prevent Muslims from dining with the people of Book    provided Haram food is not served.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See original here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kashmirmonitor.in\/Details\/129930\/muslims-and-modernism\" title=\"Muslims and Modernism - Kasmir Monitor\">Muslims and Modernism - Kasmir Monitor<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The nineteenth century witnessed a great change in the outlook of Muslims of the Subcontinent. Colonialism, along with the development of scientific attitude, affected the religious universe drastically. And, this, in turn, led to a hot debate on religious dogmas and rationality; rather a paradigm shift in the thought of educated Muslims.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/rationalism\/muslims-and-modernism-kasmir-monitor\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187714],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rationalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211220"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211220"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211220\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}