{"id":210766,"date":"2017-08-09T05:13:10","date_gmt":"2017-08-09T09:13:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/true-ai-cannot-be-developed-until-the-brain-code-has-been-cracked-starmind-zdnet\/"},"modified":"2017-08-09T05:13:10","modified_gmt":"2017-08-09T09:13:10","slug":"true-ai-cannot-be-developed-until-the-brain-code-has-been-cracked-starmind-zdnet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/true-ai-cannot-be-developed-until-the-brain-code-has-been-cracked-starmind-zdnet\/","title":{"rendered":"True AI cannot be developed until the &#8216;brain code&#8217; has been cracked: Starmind &#8211; ZDNet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Marc Vontobel, CTO & Pascal Kaufmann,    CEO, Starmind  <\/p>\n<p>    Artificial intelligence is stuck today because companies are    likening the human brain to a computer, according to Swiss    neuroscientist and co-founder of Starmind Pascal Kaufmann.    However, the brain does not process information, retrieve    knowledge, or store memories like a computer does.  <\/p>\n<p>    When companies claim to be using AI to power \"the next    generation\" of their products, what they are unknowingly    referring to is the intersection of big data, analytics, and    automation, Kaufmann told ZDNet.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Today, so called AI is often just the human intelligence of    programmers condensed into source code,\" said Kaufmann, who    worked on cyborgs previously at DARPA.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We shouldn't need 300 million pictures of cats to be able to    say whether something is a cat, cow, or dog. Intelligence is    not related to big data; it's related to small data. If you can    look at a cat, extract the principles of a cat like children    do, then forever understand what a cat is, that's    intelligence.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    He even said that it's not \"true AI\" that led to AlphaGo -- a    creation of Google subsidiary DeepMind --     mastering what is revered as the world's most demanding    strategy game, Go.  <\/p>\n<p>    The technology behind AlphaGo was able to look at 10 to 20    potential future moves and lay out the highest statistics for    success, Kaufmann said, and so the test was one of rule-based    strategy rather than artificial intelligence.  <\/p>\n<p>    The ability for a machine to strategise outside the context of    a rule-based game would reflect true AI, according to Kaufmann,    who believes that AI will cheat without being programmed not to    do so.  <\/p>\n<p>    Additionally, the ability to automate human behaviour or labour    is not necessarily a reflection of machines getting smarter,    Kaufmann insisted.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Take a pump, for example. Instead of collecting water from the    river, you can just use a pump. But that is not artificial    intelligence; it is the automation of manual work ...    Human-level AI would be able to apply insights to new    situations,\" Kaufmann added.  <\/p>\n<p>    While Facebook's plans to build a     brain-computer interface and     Elon Musk's plans to merge the human brain with AI have    left people wondering how close we are to developing true AI,    Kaufmann believes the \"brain code\" needs to be cracked before    we can really advance the field. He said this can only be    achieved through neuroscientific research.  <\/p>\n<p>    Earlier this year, founder of DeepMind Demis Hassabis    communicated a similar sentiment in a     paper, saying the fields of AI and neuroscience need to be    reconnected, and that it's only by understanding natural    intelligence that we can develop the artificial kind.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Many companies are investing their resources in building    faster computers ... we need to focus more on [figuring out]    the principles of the brain, understand how it works ... rather    than just copy\/paste information,\" Kaufmann said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Kaufmann admitted he doesn't have all the answers, but finds it    \"interesting\" that high-profile entrepreneurs such as Musk and    Mark Zuckerberg, none of whom have AI or neuroscience    backgrounds, have such     strong and opposing views on AI.  <\/p>\n<p>    Musk and Zuckerberg slung mud at each other in July, with the    former warning of \"evil AI\" destroying humankind if not    properly monitored and regulated, while the latter spoke    optimistically about AI contributing to the greater good, such    as diagnosing diseases before they become fatal.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"One is an AI alarmist and the other makes AI look charming ...    AI, like any other technology, can be used for good or used for    bad,\" said Kaufmann, who believes AI needs to be assessed    objectively.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the interim, Kaufmann believes systems need to be designed    so that humans and machines can work together, not against each    other. For example, Kaufmann envisions a future where humans    wear smart lenses -- comparable to the Google Glass -- that act    as \"the third half of the brain\" and pull up relevant    information based on conversations they are having.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Humans don't need to learn stuff like which Roman killed the    other Roman ... humans just need to be able to ask the right    questions,\" he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The key difference between human and machine is the ability to    ask questions. Machines are more for solutions.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Kaufmann admitted, however, that humans don't know how to ask    the right questions a lot of the time, because we are taught to    remember facts in school, and those who remember the most facts    are the ones who receive the best grades.  <\/p>\n<p>    He believes humans need to be educated to ask the right    questions, adding that the question is 50 percent of the    solution. The right questions will not only allow humans to    understand the principles of the brain and develop true AI, but    will also keep us relevant even when AI systems proliferate,    according to Kaufmann.  <\/p>\n<p>    If we want to slow down job loss, AI systems need to be    designed so that humans are at the centre of it, Kaufmann said.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"While many companies want to fully automate human work, we at    Starmind want to build a symbiosis between humans and machines.    We want to enhance human intelligence. If humans don't embrace    the latest technology, they will become irrelevant,\" he added.  <\/p>\n<p>    The company claims its self-learning system autonomously    connects and maps the internal know-how of large groups of    people, allowing employees to tap into their organisation's    knowledge base or \"corporate brain\" when they have queries.  <\/p>\n<p>    Starmind platform  <\/p>\n<p>    Starmind is integrated into existing communication channels --    such as Skype for Business or a corporate browser --    eliminating the need to change employee behaviour, Kaufmann    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Questions typed in the question window are answered instantly    if an expert's answer is already stored in Starmind, and new    questions are automatically routed to the right expert within    the organisation, based on skills, availability patterns, and    willingness to share know-how. All answers enhance the    corporate knowledge base.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Our vision is if you connect thousands of human brains in a    smart way, you can outsmart any machine,\" Kaufmann said.  <\/p>\n<p>    On how this is different to asking a search engine a question,    Kaufmann said Google is basically \"a big data machine\" and    mines answers to questions that have been already asked, but is    not able to answer brand new questions.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The future of Starmind is we actually anticipate questions    before they're even asked because we know so much about the    employee. For example, we can say if you are a new hire and you    consume a certain piece of content, there will be a 90 percent    probability that you will ask the following three questions    within the next three minutes and so here are the solutions.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Starmind is being currently used across more than 40 countries    by organisations such as Accenture, Bayer, Nestl, and    Telefonica Deutschland.  <\/p>\n<p>    While Kaufmann thinks it is important at this point in time to    enhance human intelligence rather than replicate it    artificially, he does believe AI will eventually substitute    humans in the workplace. But unlike the grim picture painted by    critics, he doesn't think it's a bad thing.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Why do humans need to work at all? I look forward to all my    leisure time. I do not need to work in order to feel like a    human,\" Kaufmann said.  <\/p>\n<p>    When asked how people would make money and sustain themselves,    Kaufmann said society does not need to be ruled by money.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"In many science fiction scenarios, they do not have money.    When you look at the ant colonies or other animals, they do not    have cash,\" Kaufmann said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Additionally, if humans had continuous access to intelligent    machines, Kaufmann said \"the acceleration of human development    will pick up\" and \"it will give rise to new species\".  <\/p>\n<p>    \"AI is the ultimate tool for human advancement,\" he firmly    stated.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/true-ai-cannot-be-developed-until-the-someone-cracks-the-brain-code-starmind\/\" title=\"True AI cannot be developed until the 'brain code' has been cracked: Starmind - ZDNet\">True AI cannot be developed until the 'brain code' has been cracked: Starmind - ZDNet<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Marc Vontobel, CTO &#038; Pascal Kaufmann, CEO, Starmind Artificial intelligence is stuck today because companies are likening the human brain to a computer, according to Swiss neuroscientist and co-founder of Starmind Pascal Kaufmann. However, the brain does not process information, retrieve knowledge, or store memories like a computer does <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/true-ai-cannot-be-developed-until-the-brain-code-has-been-cracked-starmind-zdnet\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210766"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210766\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}