{"id":210672,"date":"2017-08-09T04:47:10","date_gmt":"2017-08-09T08:47:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/sampling-dna-from-a-1000-year-old-illuminated-manuscript-the-atlantic\/"},"modified":"2017-08-09T04:47:10","modified_gmt":"2017-08-09T08:47:10","slug":"sampling-dna-from-a-1000-year-old-illuminated-manuscript-the-atlantic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/sampling-dna-from-a-1000-year-old-illuminated-manuscript-the-atlantic\/","title":{"rendered":"Sampling DNA From a 1000-Year-Old Illuminated Manuscript &#8211; The Atlantic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The York Gospels were assembled more than a thousand years ago.    Bound in leather, illustrated, and illuminated, the book    contains the four gospels of the Bible as well as land records    and oaths taken by clergymen who read, rubbed, and kissed its    pages over centuries. The Archbishops of York still swear their    oaths on this book.  <\/p>\n<p>    The York Gospels are also, quite literally, a bunch of old cow    and sheep skins. Skin has DNA, and DNA has its own story to    tell.  <\/p>\n<p>    A group of archaeologists and geneticists in the United Kingdom    have now analyzed the remarkably rich DNA reservoir of the York    Gospels. They found DNA from humans who swore oaths on its    pages and from bacteria likely originating on the hands and    mouths of those humans. Best of all though, they found    1,000-year-old DNA from the cows and sheep whose skin became    the parchment on which the book is written.  <\/p>\n<p>    Remarkably, the authors say they extracted all this DNA without    destroying even a tiny piece of parchment. All they needed were    the crumbs from rubbing the book with erasers, which    conservationists routinely use to clean manuscripts. The    authors report their findings in a preprint that has not    yet been peer-reviewed, though they plan to submit it to a    scientific journal.  <\/p>\n<p>    If their technique works, it could revolutionize the use of    parchment to study history. Every one of these books is a herd    of animals. Using DNA, researchers might track how a disease    changed the makeup of a herd or how the skin of sheep from one    region moved to another medieval trade routes. Its part of a    growing movement to bring    together scholars in the sciences and humanities to study    medieval manuscripts.  <\/p>\n<p>    Scientists have extracted    DNA from parchment before, but this non-destructive    technique expands the potential pool of research material.    Archivists are loathe to allow researchers to cut off a piece    of, say, the York Gospels, but some eraser crumbs? Sure.    Thats why its such an exciting breakthrough. It allows a lot    of different manuscripts from a lot of different areas to be    analyzed together, says Bruce Holsinger, an    English professor at the University of Virginia who is writing    a book about parchment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The idea to study parchment came to Matthew    Collins, an archaeologist at the University of York, after    a failed study in bones. A few years ago, he had a graduate    student trying to extract ancient DNA from animal bones at an    old Viking settlement. There were thousands of bones on the    site, but only six that they tested yielded DNAtoo few for any    statistically significant results. You can imagine the    frustration, says Collins.  <\/p>\n<p>    So Collins got to thinking about archives full of old    manuscripts. You look at these shelves, and every one of them    has a skin of an animal with a date written on it, he says.    Suddenly you have thousands of animals. And you didnt even    need to go out into the field and dig. When Collins and    postdoctoral researcher Sarah    Fiddyment first approached archives to collaborate though,    they made the mistake of thinking like archaeologists used to    routinely pulverizing bone for DNA analysis. They told us we    would not be allowed to sample the parchments. Matthew and I    didnt think of it, says Fiddyment. She ended up shadowing    conservationists for several weeks and learned about their    eraser technique. White plastic erasers made by Staedtler    turned out to be perfect for cleaning manuscripts and for    collecting DNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    Collins and Fiddyment had previously collaborated with    Holsinger to use the eraser technique to study proteins from    uterine vellumso named because it is so thin that people    thought that they were made from the skin of unborn livestock.    Others, however suggested the skin came from different animals    entirely, like squirrel or rabbit. The team published a    study    in 2015 analyzing proteins rubbed off of uterine vellum. They    found that uterine vellum is indeed from calves, sheep, and    goats, though not necessarily unborn ones.  <\/p>\n<p>    With the York Gospels, Collins and Fiddyment went one step    further to look for DNA with the eraser technique. They    analyzed eraser dust from eight pages. Three of the samples    yielded enough DNA to compare to modern cattle genomes, and the    single most complete parchment genome was similar to modern    Norwegian reds and Holsteins.  <\/p>\n<p>    They also looked at the sex of the calves. Four of the five    whose sex they could determine from DNA were female, which they    found highly unusual if representative. Females are more    valuable if you want to grow your herds, so why would you kill    so many females to make parchment? Collins and Fiddyment    consulted with Annelise Binois-Roman, a zooarchaeologist, who    noted that a cattle plague swept through England in the years    before the York Gospels were created. Perhaps those dead calves    were salvaged to make parchment. Another colleague who    specialized in the Anglo-Saxon era suggested maybe precious    female calves were deliberately used because it is such an    important book.  <\/p>\n<p>    The First Book of Selfies  <\/p>\n<p>    Collins and Fiddyment recognize that scientists alone cant    make sense of the DNA from parchment. They need historians and    literary scholars and curators to interpret their findings.    Since then, Collins has reached out to scholars and archivists    far and wide to collect more DNA samples.  <\/p>\n<p>    Timothy    Stinson, an English professor at North Carolina State    University, first wrote about studying DNA from parchment seven    years ago. I felt like the voice in the wilderness, says    Stinson. Thats changed now with the efforts of Collins and    others. Stinson is interested in using DNA to study how the    production of books changed over time. Early on, he says,    manuscripts were likely made up of related animals from the    same herd. But as cities like London and Paris grew, guilds    sprung up to make books, bringing in parchment from all over.  <\/p>\n<p>    Collins points out that medievalists studying copying errors in    manuscripts have long used the same phylogenetic programs that    evolutionary biologists use to study how DNA mutations appear    over time. DNA analysis is simply a new way to read the hidden    messages in parchment.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View original post here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/science\/archive\/2017\/08\/the-secret-life-of-illuminated-manuscripts-as-told-in-dna\/536172\/\" title=\"Sampling DNA From a 1000-Year-Old Illuminated Manuscript - The Atlantic\">Sampling DNA From a 1000-Year-Old Illuminated Manuscript - The Atlantic<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The York Gospels were assembled more than a thousand years ago. Bound in leather, illustrated, and illuminated, the book contains the four gospels of the Bible as well as land records and oaths taken by clergymen who read, rubbed, and kissed its pages over centuries. The Archbishops of York still swear their oaths on this book <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/sampling-dna-from-a-1000-year-old-illuminated-manuscript-the-atlantic\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210672"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210672\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}