From: Steven J. Beyers Winona <\/p>\n
A July 30 opinion writer stated that the Second Amendment was originally meant for militia, now expanded to self defense. <\/p>\n
In 1791, George Mason asked, Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers. He also wrote ... that standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty ... <\/p>\n
Patrick Henry said, The great object is, that every man be armed ... Everyone who is able may have a gun. <\/p>\n
In the Federalist No. 28, Alexander Hamilton, wrote, If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no course left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government. <\/p>\n
The opinion writer also stated, The founders understood that majority rule had its dangers ... That is why we are not a democracy, but are, in the words of Ben Franklin, A republic, if you can keep it. <\/p>\n
The Constitution provides an amendment process that allows for additions and adjustments. From privates to presidents, all public servants swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies. As someone who has sworn that oath twice, I find it curious that the writer, who has sworn that same oath, would describe the Constitution as deeply flawed. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Excerpt from: From: Steven J. Continue reading
\nSecond Amendment insight - Winona Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"