{"id":210361,"date":"2017-08-06T17:33:44","date_gmt":"2017-08-06T21:33:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/marriage-equality-five-liberal-mps-back-dean-smiths-bill-ahead-of-bruising-debate-the-guardian\/"},"modified":"2017-08-06T17:33:44","modified_gmt":"2017-08-06T21:33:44","slug":"marriage-equality-five-liberal-mps-back-dean-smiths-bill-ahead-of-bruising-debate-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberal\/marriage-equality-five-liberal-mps-back-dean-smiths-bill-ahead-of-bruising-debate-the-guardian\/","title":{"rendered":"Marriage equality: five Liberal MPs back Dean Smith&#8217;s bill ahead of bruising debate &#8211; The Guardian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Supporters of marriage equality march through Sydney on Sunday as  the Coalition government gets set to debate its policy.  Photograph: Peter Parks\/AFP\/Getty Images<\/p>\n<p>    Five Liberal MPs released an unprecedented joint statement in    support of Dean Smiths marriage equality bill, attracting    overwhelming support from advocates as the Liberal party    prepared for a bruising debate in a special party room meeting.  <\/p>\n<p>    But the outcome of the issue remains in play, as Malcolm Turnbull is    under pressure from supporters to allow a free vote and    opponents urge him to stick to the policy of a plebiscite.  <\/p>\n<p>    The prime minister called the meeting to allow discussion after    Smith made it    clear he was preparing the bill to come before the    parliament. The Liberal meeting will not start until 4pm    and it follows the National party meeting on Friday, which    supported the existing plebiscite policy.  <\/p>\n<p>    After the Liberals meet, the Coalition will have    to come together again for the joint party room meeting on    Tuesday morning ahead of parliament where any outcomes could be    further raked over.  <\/p>\n<p>    Smiths bill has forced the Coalition party room to resolve    whether to allow a conscience vote as John Howard had done in    the past on the abortion drug RU486, stem cell research and    euthanasia.<\/p>\n<p>    Labors manager of opposition business, Tony Burke, promised    not to use marriage equality to spark a no-confidence motion in    the Coalition government. The majority of Labor MPs support the    change though it is understood a small group of four MPs are    opposed. Four of the five crossbenchers also support change,    with only Bob Katter opposed to marriage equality.  <\/p>\n<p>    Smiths bill would redefine marriage as a union of two people,    to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for    life and include all lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and    intersex people and relationships.  <\/p>\n<p>    In a joint statement, Smith, Warren Entsch, Trent    Zimmerman, Tim Wilson and Trevor Evans said the marriage bill    was the first to introduce protection for the views of    ministers of religion and Australian defence force chaplains,    while creating a new class of religious marriage    celebrants.<\/p>\n<p>    Zimmerman said delivering marriage equality would strengthen    family life.  <\/p>\n<p>    We believe marriage to be a fundamental institution in    Australian life and ensuring all couples have access to it will    be beneficial to individuals, couples, families and the    community, and will strengthen Australian family life, said    Zimmerman.  <\/p>\n<p>    Evans said it was time the political stalemate was broken and    the bill was passed to allow the parliament to move on.<\/p>\n<p>    Entsch, the Coalitions longtime campaigner on the issue, said    the issue was about real peoples lives.  <\/p>\n<p>    LGBTI people are our brothers and sisters, friends and work    colleagues. They just want the same dignity as everyone else in    their families. Lets just do this, Entsch said.  <\/p>\n<p>    On Sunday, Smith warned    his conservative colleagues that a future Labor bill would    not contain such religious protections.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bill closely reflects the recommendations of the consensus    Senate report, which unanimously rejected several proposed    forms of discrimination against LGBTI people, including the    ability for civil celebrants to reject their weddings.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bill would confirm the requirements for a legally valid    marriage otherwise remain the same under the Marriage Act, by    introducing non-gendered language to ensure the requirements    continue to apply equally to all marriages.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bill would also enable same-sex marriages solemnised in    another country to be recognised in Australia.  <\/p>\n<p>    It would also create a new category to include for religious    ministers from independent religious organisations as well as    existing marriage celebrants wanting to perform marriages    consistent with their religious beliefs.  <\/p>\n<p>    Existing registered celebrants who are not ministers of    religion would have 90 days to notify in writing that they wish    to be identified as a religious marriage celebrant based on    their beliefs. These formerly civil marriage celebrants would    be required to advertise their services as a religious marriage    celebrant.  <\/p>\n<p>    If the bill is passed, there would also be a new category of    officers to solemnise marriages of members of the Australian    defence force overseas.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bill would allow ministers of religion to refuse to    solemnise a marriage in conformity with their religions    doctrine.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bodies established for religious purposes would be able to    refuse to provide facilities, goods or services on the grounds    of their religion.  <\/p>\n<p>    The co-chair of Australian Marriage Equality, Alex Greenwich,    said the bill represents the most robust and genuine approach    to achieve marriage equality that the parliament had seen.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its passage will fulfil the hopes of loving and same-sex    couples to get married, and truly reflect Australias shared    values of fairness and equality, Greenwich said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Anna Brown, co-chair of the Equality Campaign, welcomed the    bill and said it was in keeping with the roadmap set by the    bipartisan Senate report agreed on earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>    Weve been waiting for marriage equality for a long time and    now our politicians have the opportunity to make it a reality    with a bill that reflects the hard work and extensive    consultation undertaken by a Senate committee earlier this    year, said Brown.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/australia-news\/2017\/aug\/06\/marriage-equality-five-liberal-mps-back-dean-smiths-bill-ahead-of-bruising-debate\" title=\"Marriage equality: five Liberal MPs back Dean Smith's bill ahead of bruising debate - The Guardian\">Marriage equality: five Liberal MPs back Dean Smith's bill ahead of bruising debate - The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Supporters of marriage equality march through Sydney on Sunday as the Coalition government gets set to debate its policy. Photograph: Peter Parks\/AFP\/Getty Images Five Liberal MPs released an unprecedented joint statement in support of Dean Smiths marriage equality bill, attracting overwhelming support from advocates as the Liberal party prepared for a bruising debate in a special party room meeting <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberal\/marriage-equality-five-liberal-mps-back-dean-smiths-bill-ahead-of-bruising-debate-the-guardian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187824],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210361","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210361"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210361\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}