{"id":210307,"date":"2017-08-06T16:53:08","date_gmt":"2017-08-06T20:53:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/germanys-spd-rejects-nato-2-percent-defense-spending-target-reuters\/"},"modified":"2017-08-06T16:53:08","modified_gmt":"2017-08-06T20:53:08","slug":"germanys-spd-rejects-nato-2-percent-defense-spending-target-reuters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nato-2\/germanys-spd-rejects-nato-2-percent-defense-spending-target-reuters\/","title":{"rendered":"Germany&#8217;s SPD rejects NATO 2 percent defense spending target &#8211; Reuters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    BERLIN (Reuters) - Germany's Social Democrats on Sunday    rejected NATO's target of spending 2 percent of national output    on defense and accused German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her    conservatives of kowtowing to the demands of U.S. President    Donald Trump.  <\/p>\n<p>    With Germans set to vote in a national election next month, SPD    leader Martin Schulz and Thomas Oppermann, who heads the    center-left party in parliament, issued their strongest    criticism to date of Merkel, the NATO spending target and    Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We say a clear no to the 'two-percent target' of Trump and the    CDU\/CSU,\" the two leaders wrote in an essay for the Funke    Mediengruppe newspaper chain, referring to Merkel's Christian    Democrats and their Bavarian sister party.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It's not only unrealistic, it is simply the wrong goal,\" they    said, in comments aimed at differentiating the SPD from    Merkel's conservatives after four years in a \"grand coalition\".  <\/p>\n<p>    The comments put the SPD on a collision course with U.S.    officials, who began pressing Germany long before Trump's    election last November to increase its military spending.  <\/p>\n<p>    The SPD leaders, whose party is lagging Merkel's Christian    Democrats in the polls by 15 percentage points, said Germany    would have to nearly double current defense spending from 37    billion euros to meet the NATO target. That would make it the    largest military power in Europe - a goal they said \"no one    could want\" given Germany's Nazi history.  <\/p>\n<p>    Instead, they said, Germany should focus on building a strong    European defense union and, ultimately, a European army - a    stance that may resonate with a deeply pacifist German public    that remains skeptical of military engagements.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Merkel and the CDU\/CSU make themselves small vis-a-vis Donald    Trump when they answer his provocations around the two-percent    target by saying, 'Okay, fine, we'll put in more money,' as if    we didn't have any better ideas what to do,\" they wrote.  <\/p>\n<p>    They said increased military spending should be matched by    higher outlays for diplomacy, humanitarian aid and crisis    prevention.  <\/p>\n<p>    Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel, a former SPD leader, has also    questioned the NATO target, but the Schulz-Oppermann essay was    far more explicit, driving a further wedge between the parties    in Merkel's right-left coalition.  <\/p>\n<p>    Merkel, who is poised to win reelection on Sept. 24, insists    that Germany is committed to reach the two percent target. She    has also chided Gabriel pointedly, noting his predecessor    signed off on the NATO commitment when it was first made years    ago.  <\/p>\n<p>    Merkel's conservatives have about 38 to 40 percent support in    the polls, and hope to form a coalition government with one or    more of the smaller parties, after the election.  <\/p>\n<p>    Political analysts say the SPD's tougher stance on military    projects could help lay the groundwork for a post-election    coalition with the pro-environment Greens and the Left party.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Sevim Dagdelen, a leading member of the Left party, said it    was deceitful to call for more spending on European defense    projects as the money would still probably come at the expense    of social programs.  <\/p>\n<p>    In June, the SPD also reversed course and rejected plans to    lease Israeli drones that can carry weapons to protect German    soldiers serving in Afghanistan and Mali, sparking sharp    criticism from von der Leyen and the top officer in the German    air force.  <\/p>\n<p>    The essay also criticized von der Leyen's leadership as defense    minister since late 2013, citing continued problems with    equipment, a lack of planning, and challenges in recruitment.  <\/p>\n<p>      Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Mary Milliken and      Gareth Jones    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-germany-election-military-spd-idUSKBN1AM001\" title=\"Germany's SPD rejects NATO 2 percent defense spending target - Reuters\">Germany's SPD rejects NATO 2 percent defense spending target - Reuters<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> BERLIN (Reuters) - Germany's Social Democrats on Sunday rejected NATO's target of spending 2 percent of national output on defense and accused German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her conservatives of kowtowing to the demands of U.S. President Donald Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nato-2\/germanys-spd-rejects-nato-2-percent-defense-spending-target-reuters\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94882],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nato-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210307"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210307\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}