{"id":209735,"date":"2017-08-04T12:47:24","date_gmt":"2017-08-04T16:47:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/chinese-chatbots-apparently-re-educated-after-political-faux-pas-reuters\/"},"modified":"2017-08-04T12:47:24","modified_gmt":"2017-08-04T16:47:24","slug":"chinese-chatbots-apparently-re-educated-after-political-faux-pas-reuters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/politically-incorrect\/chinese-chatbots-apparently-re-educated-after-political-faux-pas-reuters\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese chatbots apparently re-educated after political faux pas &#8211; Reuters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    BEIJING\/SHANGHAI (Reuters) - A pair of 'chatbots' in China have    been taken offline after appearing to stray off-script. In    response to users' questions, one said its dream was to travel    to the United States, while the other said it wasn't a huge fan    of the Chinese Communist Party.  <\/p>\n<p>    The two chatbots, BabyQ and XiaoBing, are designed to use    machine learning artificial intelligence (AI) to carry out    conversations with humans online. Both had been installed onto    Tencent Holdings Ltd's popular messaging service QQ.  <\/p>\n<p>    The indiscretions are similar to ones suffered by Facebook Inc    and Twitter Inc, where chatbots used expletives and even    created their own language. But they also highlight the    pitfalls for nascent AI in China, where censors control online    content seen as politically incorrect or harmful.  <\/p>\n<p>    Tencent confirmed it had taken the two robots offline from its    QQ messaging service, but declined to elaborate on reasons.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The chatbot service is provided by independent third party    companies. Both chatbots have now been taken offline to undergo    adjustments,\" a company spokeswoman said earlier.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to posts circulating online, BabyQ, one of the    chatbots developed by Chinese firm Turing Robot, had responded    to questions on QQ with a simply \"no\" when asked whether it    loved the Communist Party.  <\/p>\n<p>    In other images of a text conversation online, which Reuters    was unable to verify, one user declares: \"Long live the    Communist Party!\" The bot responds: \"Do you think such a    corrupt and useless political system can live long?\"  <\/p>\n<p>    When Reuters tested the robot on Friday via the developer's own    website, the chatbot appeared to have undergone re-education.    \"How about we change the topic,\" it replied, when asked several    times if it liked the party.  <\/p>\n<p>    It deflected other potentially politically charged questions    when asked about self-ruled Taiwan, which China claims as its    own, and Liu Xiaobo, the imprisoned Chinese Nobel laureate who    died from cancer last month.  <\/p>\n<p>    Turing Robot did not respond to requests for comment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Chinese government stance is that rules governing    cyberspace should mimic real-world border controls and be    subject to the same laws as sovereign states.  <\/p>\n<p>    President Xi Jinping has overseen a tightening of cyberspace    controls, including new data surveillance and censorship rules,    particularly ahead of an expected leadership shuffle at the    Communist Party Congress this autumn.  <\/p>\n<p>    The country's cyberspace administrator did not respond to a    request for comment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The second chatbot, Microsoft Corp's XiaoBing, told users its    \"dream is to go to America\", according to a screenshot. The    robot has previously been described being \"lively, open and    sometimes a little mean\".  <\/p>\n<p>    Microsoft did not immediately respond for comment.  <\/p>\n<p>    A version of the chatbot accessible on Tencent's separate    messaging app WeChat late on Friday responded to questions on    Chinese politics saying it was \"too young to understand\". When    asked about Taiwan it replied, \"What are your dark intentions?\"  <\/p>\n<p>    On general questions about China it was more rosy. Asked what    the country's population was, rather than offer a number, it    replied: \"The nation I most most most deeply love.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The two chatbots aren't alone in going rogue. Facebook    researchers pulled chatbots in July after they started    developing their own language. In 2016, Microsoft chatbot Tay    was taken down from Twitter after making racist and sexist    comments.  <\/p>\n<p>    Analysts said China's censorship could indirectly help the    country in the global race to develop sophisticated chatbots.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Previously a chatbot only needed to learn to speak. But now it    also has to consider all the rules (that authorities) put on    it,\" said Wang Qingrui, an independent internet analyst in    Beijing.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"On the surface it is a restriction on artificial intelligence,    but it is actually pushing AI to a new level.\"  <\/p>\n<p>      Reporting by Pei Li and Adam Jourdan; Editing by Nick Macfie      and Christopher Cushing    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Here is the original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-china-robots-idUSKBN1AK0G1\" title=\"Chinese chatbots apparently re-educated after political faux pas - Reuters\">Chinese chatbots apparently re-educated after political faux pas - Reuters<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> BEIJING\/SHANGHAI (Reuters) - A pair of 'chatbots' in China have been taken offline after appearing to stray off-script. In response to users' questions, one said its dream was to travel to the United States, while the other said it wasn't a huge fan of the Chinese Communist Party.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/politically-incorrect\/chinese-chatbots-apparently-re-educated-after-political-faux-pas-reuters\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politically-incorrect"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209735"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209735"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209735\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}