{"id":209549,"date":"2017-08-03T10:08:21","date_gmt":"2017-08-03T14:08:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/house-freedom-caucus-narrows-down-debt-ceiling-demands-washington-examiner\/"},"modified":"2017-08-03T10:08:21","modified_gmt":"2017-08-03T14:08:21","slug":"house-freedom-caucus-narrows-down-debt-ceiling-demands-washington-examiner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/house-freedom-caucus-narrows-down-debt-ceiling-demands-washington-examiner\/","title":{"rendered":"House Freedom Caucus narrows down debt ceiling demands &#8211; Washington Examiner"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The conservative House Freedom Caucus is focusing in on one key    demand for the debt ceiling talks that are expected to develop    over the next few weeks, one that focuses on restricting    borrowing and spending as the government gets closer to the    debt ceiling.  <\/p>\n<p>    In July, the group of about 40 conservatives laid out three    possible demands they could make in talks to raise the debt    ceiling, which are expected to conclude in September because    the government is already at its borrowing limit.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those options were $250 billion in spending cuts, a bill to    repeal Obamacare, and a third possibility that aims to change    the way the government spends and borrows money as it    approaches the debt ceiling.  <\/p>\n<p>    A House aide told the Washington Examiner that there    is now little expectation that the Freedom Caucus could    realistically demand such a large spending cut and the idea of    passing any kind of healthcare reform bill seems dead given the    Senate's failure in July.  <\/p>\n<p>    That leaves the third option as the \"most realistic,\" and the    aide said the group of conservatives are expected to insist on    spending and borrowing management changes as a condition of    getting their vote in September.  <\/p>\n<p>    The aide said many in the caucus would still prefer cuts, but    said the lesser demand of asking for improved money management    on the part of the government is one they hope Republican    leaders can accept.  <\/p>\n<p>    By moving away from the demand for spending cuts, the Freedom    Caucus has \"made it pretty easy\" for GOP leaders to negotiate a    deal, the aide said.  <\/p>\n<p>    The changes being sought by the House Freedom Caucus are    reflected in a bill introduced by Rep. Dave Schweikert,    R-Ariz., called the Debt Ceiling Alternative Act. Under that    bill, the government would only be allowed to issue debt to pay    off principal and interest on the debt.  <\/p>\n<p>    It would also call on the government to rescind unobligated    funds and sell off assets in order to stay under the debt    ceiling.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those are the sorts of management changes that appeal to    conservatives, who have long sought ways to get the government    to reduce spending and borrowing when it approaches its    borrowing limit. Conservatives have complained that it's too    easy for the government to simply raise the ceiling again and    again and have sought to impose speed bumps that at least force    a discussion about the growing national debt, which is now just    short of $20 trillion.  <\/p>\n<p>    But it's not clear if GOP leaders in the House or the Senate    will accept that language. Leadership and committee aides had    little to say this week about what sorts of ideas they might    accept, and it's possible that they could decide to pursue a    simple debt ceiling hike with no strings attached that would    pass with support from Democrats.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Trump administration has also made it clear it wants a    \"clean\" debt ceiling increase. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin    has said that explicitly, a sign U.S. officials are not in the    mood to negotiate spending and borrowing limits as part of the    package.  <\/p>\n<p>    Meanwhile, the clock is ticking. Mnuchin has said the debt    ceiling needs to be resolved by September, when the House is in    for just a few weeks to deal with legislation. Several aides    indicated it's not clear at all what the plan is yet and said    there's no sign of a bill at this point.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"I'd be shocked if we saw the text of anything until the second    week in September,\" one House aide said.  <\/p>\n<p>    This aide said there is some talk of attaching a debt ceiling    bill to some other popular bill, such as one dealing with    veterans, but the plan seemed to be unsettled when the House    left for August recess last week.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/house-freedom-caucus-narrows-down-debt-ceiling-demands\/article\/2630490\" title=\"House Freedom Caucus narrows down debt ceiling demands - Washington Examiner\">House Freedom Caucus narrows down debt ceiling demands - Washington Examiner<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The conservative House Freedom Caucus is focusing in on one key demand for the debt ceiling talks that are expected to develop over the next few weeks, one that focuses on restricting borrowing and spending as the government gets closer to the debt ceiling. In July, the group of about 40 conservatives laid out three possible demands they could make in talks to raise the debt ceiling, which are expected to conclude in September because the government is already at its borrowing limit.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/house-freedom-caucus-narrows-down-debt-ceiling-demands-washington-examiner\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187727],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209549"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}