{"id":209306,"date":"2017-08-02T08:48:41","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T12:48:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/tim-cook-says-apple-had-to-comply-with-chinese-censors-and-theyd-do-it-in-the-us-too-gizmodo\/"},"modified":"2017-08-02T08:48:41","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T12:48:41","slug":"tim-cook-says-apple-had-to-comply-with-chinese-censors-and-theyd-do-it-in-the-us-too-gizmodo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/tim-cook-says-apple-had-to-comply-with-chinese-censors-and-theyd-do-it-in-the-us-too-gizmodo\/","title":{"rendered":"Tim Cook Says Apple Had to Comply With Chinese Censors, and They&#8217;d Do It in the US Too &#8211; Gizmodo"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Last week, consumer tech giant Apple removed all major VPN apps from the Chinese    branch of its Apps Store, seemingly putting yet another barrier    in place for millions of Chinese citizens who might desire to    defy their governments pervasive internet censorship system.    On Tuesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook explained why Apple chose to    comply with the wishes of Chinese censors.<\/p>\n<p>    Its pretty simple, in Cooks telling. Unlicensed VPNs are    against the law in China now, and Apple has to obey the law,    period.  <\/p>\n<p>    The central government in China back in 2015 started    tightening the regulations associated with VPN apps, Cook told    investors and media during Apples Q3 2017 earnings and    conference call, per TechCrunchs Matthew Lynley.    We have a number of those on our store. Essentially, as a    requirement for someone to operate a VPN they have to have a    license from the government there.  <\/p>\n<p>    Earlier this year, they began a renewed effort to enforce that    policy, he continued. We were required by the government to    remove some of those VPN apps from the app store that dont    meet these new regulations ... Today theres still hundreds of    VPN apps on the app store, including hundreds by developers    outside China. We would obviously rather not remove the apps,    but like we do in other countries we follow the law wherever we    do business.  <\/p>\n<p>    Heres where Cooks reply gets a little more cynical.  <\/p>\n<p>    We believe in engaging with governments even when we    disagree, Cook continued. This particular case, were hopeful    that over time the restrictions were seeing are loosened,    because innovation really requires freedom to collaborate and    communicate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cook compared the controversy to Apples 2016 battle with US    authorities over iPhone security features, saying the    situation last year was very different because US law was    on the companys side. But he added if US law changed, Apple    would have no choice but to comply.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the case of China, the law is very clear there, Cook said.    Like we would if the US changed the law here, we have to abide    by them in both cases. That doesnt mean that we dont state    our point of view in the appropriate way, we always do that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Heres the thing: Apple isnt really engaging Chinese censors    so much as complying with their orders, and theres no way    removing the VPN apps will somehow result in that censorship    being loosened. Its at best a tradeoff between maintaining    market access on one hand, and collaborating with the current    Chinese censorship system on the other.  <\/p>\n<p>    Without getting into an argument on the merits of Chinese    artist Ai Weiweis work, he hit something on the head in a    New York Times    editorial earlier this year: Whenever the state controls or    blocks information, it not only reasserts its absolute power;    it also elicits from the people whom it rules a voluntary    submission to the system and an acknowledgment of its    dominion. While Apples decision to remove the VPN apps may be    mandated by the absolute power of the Chinese state, its    also clearly reinforcing part two of the equation, voluntary    submission to said power.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cook, of course, is clearly aware of thiswhich is why he    mentioned Apple would have no choice but to comply with a US    censorship regime, too. Hes not exactly wrong. But    its also a reminder of how any abuse of power requires    enablers, and institutions whose bottom line rely on compliance    are probably not going to save anyone from autocracy. With a    few exceptions, theyll    usually comply.  <\/p>\n<p>    Elsewhere during the call, Cook noted, mainland China    sales are doing just fine. The companys poor performance was    mostly due to poor sales in the mostly autonomous region of    Hong Kong, which has much less restrictive laws on censorship.  <\/p>\n<p>    [Matthew Lynley]  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/tim-cook-says-apple-had-to-comply-with-chinese-censors-1797449499\" title=\"Tim Cook Says Apple Had to Comply With Chinese Censors, and They'd Do It in the US Too - Gizmodo\">Tim Cook Says Apple Had to Comply With Chinese Censors, and They'd Do It in the US Too - Gizmodo<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Last week, consumer tech giant Apple removed all major VPN apps from the Chinese branch of its Apps Store, seemingly putting yet another barrier in place for millions of Chinese citizens who might desire to defy their governments pervasive internet censorship system. On Tuesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook explained why Apple chose to comply with the wishes of Chinese censors <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/tim-cook-says-apple-had-to-comply-with-chinese-censors-and-theyd-do-it-in-the-us-too-gizmodo\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209306"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209306\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}