{"id":208928,"date":"2017-07-31T10:00:40","date_gmt":"2017-07-31T14:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/india-has-failed-taslima-nasreen-yet-again-freedom-of-speech-is-still-a-victim-as-govt-police-pass-the-buck-firstpost\/"},"modified":"2017-07-31T10:00:40","modified_gmt":"2017-07-31T14:00:40","slug":"india-has-failed-taslima-nasreen-yet-again-freedom-of-speech-is-still-a-victim-as-govt-police-pass-the-buck-firstpost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/india-has-failed-taslima-nasreen-yet-again-freedom-of-speech-is-still-a-victim-as-govt-police-pass-the-buck-firstpost\/","title":{"rendered":"India has failed Taslima Nasreen yet again: Freedom of speech is still a victim as govt, police pass the buck &#8211; Firstpost"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    India has failed Taslima Nasreen yet again. The fact that the    Bangladeshi author was denied entry into Aurangabad in    Maharashtra, despite BJP governments at the state and the    Centre, indicates that there is no space for freedom of speech    in India regardless of which political formation is in power.  <\/p>\n<p>      Cartoon by Manjul    <\/p>\n<p>    And this isn't the first time that Nasreen has faced bullying    from fundamentalists in India. What makes her case truly tragic    is that there is no one to speak up for her. In her work,    Nasreen has often taken a stand against bigotry and intolerance    in Islam and has largely been abandoned by the so-called    liberals. Her ordeals, in India at least, sit at the    intersection of constitutional ambiguity, pseudo-secularism,    votebank politics, mob violence and the State's repeated and    pathetic failure in implementing law and order.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is bad enough that the exiled author, now a Swedish citizen,    has to go through the annual humiliation of applying for an    Indian visa. Now it appears that we are unable to ensure even    her basic safety when she is in the country on a low-key,    private visit. She intended to visit the Ajanta and Ellora    caves but all she witnessed was the caving in of the    Maharashtra Police.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rahul Shrirame, deputy commissioner of police (Zone-II), told    PTI that the author, who landed in Aurangabad around    7.30 pm on Saturday, was immediately sent back by a Mumbai-bound    flight to avoid any \"law and order problem\" in the city.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yashasvi Yadav, the city police commissioner, told The Times of India that the writer    had not shared prior details of her visit with the cops, and    \"citing security reasons, we asked her to board the next    flight, and she agreed\".  <\/p>\n<p>      File image of Taslima Nasreen. PTI    <\/p>\n<p>    \"There is already tension and tight security in the city    because of the ongoing demolition of illegal religious    structures. We cannot tackle more problems at this moment,\"    another police officer was quoted as saying in the same report.  <\/p>\n<p>    Interestingly, even as the police claimed that they were    unaware of Nasreen's itinerary until an hour of her arrival,    the protestors  a motley crew led by AIMIM legislator Imtiyaz    Jaleel  possessed specific details of her programme. They knew    when she would arrive and were ready at the airport gate with    placards, while another group started creating a ruckus in    front of the five-star hotel where she had booked a room in her    friend's name.  <\/p>\n<p>    Shrirame admitted that the protestors knew very specific details. \"We are wondering about    the source of such specific information. The protestors were    aware of her entire schedule, including the places she would be    visiting and the date she would be returning.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    An argument is being made that it was Nasreen's decision to    return to Mumbai. She acted out of own volition. This is    hogwash. When cops are dropping large hints that her stay at    Aurangabad could \"create law and order problems\", what is she    to do? Take a risk? The law and order machinery is part of the    state's coercive power. And it exists for a reason. It is the    state's responsibility to ensure rule of law and it cannot put    the onus on the individual. It is a pathetic attempt at    blame-shifting and paints a miserable picture of the Devendra    Fadnavis administration.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sadly, the script follows the template set by the Left Front or    Trinamool Congress governments in West Bengal. The    \"progressive\" Left Front had repeatedly caved in before    Islamists in banning Nasreen's bookDwikhandita    in 2004, or in asking her to leave the state in 2007 to ensure peace.  <\/p>\n<p>    Soon after coming to power, the Mamata Banerjee government in    2012 had cancelled the release of her book Nirbashan    at the vaunted Kolkata Book Fair, and a year later,    stopped the airing of a TV serial scripted by the acclaimed    author. According to a report in The Indian Express, it was done under    direct instructions from the chief minister.  <\/p>\n<p>    This prompted Nasreen to tell the media that Mamata turned out    to be harsher than the earlier Left regime. \"I had expected the    situation in West Bengal to change after Mamata came to power.    But I was wrong. I found her harsher than the earlier Left    Front government,\" she was quoted as saying.  <\/p>\n<p>    Furthermore, in an interview to Catch News, the writer had blasted    the TMC government for \"creating a Frankenstein\". \"Mamata    Banerjee's Muslim appeasement policy made these fundamentalists    this violent. I remember, two years ago, when her government    banned my TV script only to appease some Muslim fanatics. Now    she is seeing the results of those actions. She has created a    Frankenstein monster.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    It isn't about the BJP, the Left Front, Congress (banning    Salman Rushdie) or the TMC, however. It is about the State's    failure to uphold an individual's rights before the coercive    power of the collective. This mentality goes at the heart of    the mob violence or lynching episodes in India where anyone can    twist rules and break laws under the cover of a group.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Constitution fails to protect the citizen, simply because    far too many dilutions have been allowed to affect the sanctity    of Article 19(1)(a). Free speech is one of the building blocks    of democracy, but in India, in a radical sleight of competitive    vote-bank politics, the fundamental right to express one's    opinion has been totally usurped by one's right to feel    offended.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the current scenario, furthermore, there is another devious    ploy at work. The AIMIM is catering to its electoral    constituency in protesting against Nasreen (never mind that    many of those protestors may not have read even one her books),    while the BJP is scoring points in letting the author become a    victim of Islamist intolerance. It's a zero sum, yet a win-win    game for both.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/india\/india-has-failed-taslima-nasreen-yet-again-freedom-of-speech-is-still-a-victim-as-govt-police-pass-the-buck-3877827.html\" title=\"India has failed Taslima Nasreen yet again: Freedom of speech is still a victim as govt, police pass the buck - Firstpost\">India has failed Taslima Nasreen yet again: Freedom of speech is still a victim as govt, police pass the buck - Firstpost<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> India has failed Taslima Nasreen yet again. The fact that the Bangladeshi author was denied entry into Aurangabad in Maharashtra, despite BJP governments at the state and the Centre, indicates that there is no space for freedom of speech in India regardless of which political formation is in power.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/india-has-failed-taslima-nasreen-yet-again-freedom-of-speech-is-still-a-victim-as-govt-police-pass-the-buck-firstpost\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208928"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}