{"id":208428,"date":"2017-07-28T19:09:47","date_gmt":"2017-07-28T23:09:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/how-india-is-trying-to-conserve-precious-natural-resources-economic-times\/"},"modified":"2017-07-28T19:09:47","modified_gmt":"2017-07-28T23:09:47","slug":"how-india-is-trying-to-conserve-precious-natural-resources-economic-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/resource-based-economy\/how-india-is-trying-to-conserve-precious-natural-resources-economic-times\/","title":{"rendered":"How India is trying to conserve precious natural resources &#8211; Economic Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Forty-five years ago, the Club of Rome, an organisation of  individuals who share a common concern for the future of  humanity, published a study, The Limits to Growth, which  initiated a debate about the impact of unlimited growth in  population and demand for goods in a world with finite resources.  The report was based on a study by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who used a  computer model to track the worlds economy and environment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Focusing on industrialisation, population, food, use of    resources, pollution and modelled data up to 1970, they    developed a range of scenarios up to 2100, taking into account    steps taken to address environmental and resource issues.    Without serious action, the model predicted overshoot and    collapse before 2070. The Limits to Growth generated    controversy. Not because the questions it raised about the    problems of population control, environmental degradation, and    resource exhaustion were unimportant, but because of its    methodology: the reliance on computer models and its doomsday    conclusions.  <\/p>\n<p>    Averting overshoot and crash scenario, the study noted would    require policies and investments in technology to alter the    course. Essentially this 1970s study viewed economic growth as    inimical to environmental protection and resource conservation.    In the 1970s, this would mean foreclosing the path to economic    growth and consigning billions to poverty forever The social    consensus was in favour of economic growth.  <\/p>\n<p>    Beginning in the late 1980s, this gave rise to the concept of    sustainable development. This approach argued that economic    growth can be compatible with environmental protection and    resource conservation. The global conversation was also beginning to    focus on climate change.  <\/p>\n<p>    For a long time, the discussion on environment focused on    climate change. It was as if there is only one environment    brain cell. Now there is a growing realisation that climate    change is important, but the resource crisis is becoming    important as well, said Astrid Schomaker, director for global    sustainable development, environment directorate-general,    European Commission. The focus on climate change and    sustainable development led to a re-engagement on the question    of ensuring economic growth with the least impact on the    environment. The resulting concept of resource efficiency calls    for the use of natural resources in a sustainable manner and    minimising impact on the environment. This approach does not    suggest limiting growth but provides a pathway to promote    production using fewer natural resources. The Sustainable    Development Goals adopted by all countries in 2015 recognise    the need to address this issue, hence the focus on resource    efficiency.  <\/p>\n<p>    This recognition received a political boost at the G20 Summit in Hamburg in early July,    when world leaders agreed on initiating a G20 Resource    Efficiency Dialogue. The dialogue will provide an opportunity    to exchange good practices and national experiences to improve    the efficiency and sustainability of natural resource use and    to promote sustainable consumption and production patterns.    Recognising its importance, the government established the    Indian Resource Panel in 2015 as an advisory body under the    ministry of environment, forest and climate change. Supported    through Indo-German bilateral cooperation, the panel studied    resource-related issues facing India and advised the government    on a comprehensive strategy.  <\/p>\n<p>    The panels work forms the basis of a strategy paper prepared    by the government think tank, Niti Aayog, for a policy approach on    resource efficiency. For developing countries like India,    resource efficiency is particularly relevant. The rapid    transformation of its economy, its growing population,    increased pace of urbanisation, improved incomes and a growing    middle class, and the governments plans for massive industrial    push, each of these indicates growing demand for resources. In    this context, the idea of using resources in a more efficient    manner is the way forward. Indias per capita consumption of    material, 4.2 tonnes, is lowless than half the global average.    But given its larger population, Indias total resource    consumption is quite high.  <\/p>\n<p>    India is now the third-largest consumer of materials and    consumption is expected to increase rapidly, with the majority    of the people living in urban centres by 2050. The changing    face of the Indian economy is another factor. Though    agriculture continues to be the dominant employer, the share of    industry and services in employment and GDP is rising. These    are resource-intensive sectors, and the rise in disposable    incomes has led to higher consumption patterns. Indias    material requirements are projected to be 15 billion tonnes by    2030 and 25 billion tonnes by 2050.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    The bulk of the increase is expected in fossil fuel, metals and    minerals consumption, according to the Indian Resource Panel.    India and the European Union have agreed to work together over    the next three years to adapt international standards and best    practices in business and foster the efficient and sustainable    use of natural resources. This partnership will focus on    drawing up action plans for resource efficiency. The    partnership will focus on four areasmobility, particularly    electric and hybrid vehicles; building and construction;    renewable energy, especially photovoltaics; and waste, with a    focus on plastics, packaging and e-waste. Finally, it hopes to    give impetus to evidence-based policy advice that will feed    into the governments broader resource efficiency strategy.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/economictimes.indiatimes.com\/news\/politics-and-nation\/how-india-is-trying-to-conserve-precious-natural-resources\/articleshow\/59814994.cms\" title=\"How India is trying to conserve precious natural resources - Economic Times\">How India is trying to conserve precious natural resources - Economic Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Forty-five years ago, the Club of Rome, an organisation of individuals who share a common concern for the future of humanity, published a study, The Limits to Growth, which initiated a debate about the impact of unlimited growth in population and demand for goods in a world with finite resources. The report was based on a study by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who used a computer model to track the worlds economy and environment. Focusing on industrialisation, population, food, use of resources, pollution and modelled data up to 1970, they developed a range of scenarios up to 2100, taking into account steps taken to address environmental and resource issues.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/resource-based-economy\/how-india-is-trying-to-conserve-precious-natural-resources-economic-times\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187734],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-resource-based-economy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208428"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208428"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208428\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}