{"id":208410,"date":"2017-07-28T19:06:13","date_gmt":"2017-07-28T23:06:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/how-new-technology-could-threaten-a-womans-right-to-abortion-gizmodo\/"},"modified":"2017-07-28T19:06:13","modified_gmt":"2017-07-28T23:06:13","slug":"how-new-technology-could-threaten-a-womans-right-to-abortion-gizmodo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/how-new-technology-could-threaten-a-womans-right-to-abortion-gizmodo\/","title":{"rendered":"How New Technology Could Threaten a Woman&#8217;s Right to Abortion &#8211; Gizmodo"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    In April, scientists achieved a major breakthrough that could one day    drastically improve the fate of babies born extremely    prematurely. Eight premature baby lambs spent their last month    of development in an external womb that resembled a high-tech    ziplock bag. At the time, the oldest lamb was nearly a year    old, and still seemed to be developing normally.<\/p>\n<p>    This technology, if it works in humans, could one day prove    lifesaving for the 30,000 or so babies each year that are born    earlier than 26 weeks into pregnancy.  <\/p>\n<p>    It could also complicateand even jeopardizethe right to an    abortion in an America in which that right is predicated on    whether a fetus is viable.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Supreme Court has pegged the constitutional treatment of    abortion to the viability of a fetus, I. Glenn Cohen, a    Harvard Law School bioethicist, told Gizmodo. This has the    potential to really disrupt things, first by asking the    question of whether a fetus could be considered viable at the    time of abortion if you could place it in an artificial womb.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cohen raised this issue in a report for the Hastings    Center published on Friday.  <\/p>\n<p>    A normal human pregnancy lasts about 40 weeks. In Roe v.    Wade, the case that ultimately legalized abortion in 1973,    the Supreme Court ruled that whether a fetus was capable of    surviving outside the womb was an important test of whether an    abortion was legal. The Court said that viability typically    began at some point during the third trimester, which begins at    24 weeks, but could really only be determined on a case by case    basis. In 1992, Planned Parenthood vs. Casey    reaffirmed that viability is key in defining a states power to    regulate abortion. The number of weeks at which you can legally    procure an abortion varies between 22 and 24 weeks by state.    (If a womans health is at risk, the state cannot enforce an    abortion ban at any stage of development.)  <\/p>\n<p>    The human version of the external lamb womb that researchers    eventually envision creating would be designed for premature    babies born as early as 23 weeks. Researchers hope to test it    on premature human babies within five years. (Lambs have a    shorter gestation period; the 105- to 115-day-old premature    lamb fetuses were the equivalent of about 23 weeks in a human.)  <\/p>\n<p>    In the future, Cohen said, it stands to reason that this    technology could save the lives of fetuses born even earlier.    Imagine then, that you had made the decision to terminate a    pregnancy at 18 weeks, but that such a technology technically    made it viable for the fetus to be born at that point in    development, then finish developing outside the womb. Would an    abortion still be legal?  <\/p>\n<p>    It could wind up being that you only have the right to an    abortion up until you can put [a    fetus]in the artificial womb, said    Cohen. Its terrifying.  <\/p>\n<p>    The advent of such artificial womb technology highlights how    fragileand datedmuch of the law surrounding the right to an    abortion really is.  <\/p>\n<p>    In a 1983 decision, Justice Sandra Day OConnor argued that    Roevs. Wade was on a collision course    with itself, because improvements in technology would make it    possible for a fetus to continually be viable earlier in the    course of a pregnancy. In some cases, today, a fetus can now    survive outside the womb at 22 weeks, two whole weeks    earlier than at the time of Roe vs. Wade.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 1990 a woman maybe could have an abortion at 25 weeks, but    in 2020 perhaps it will be 20 weeks, said Cohen. Theres a    problem when an abortion that would be legal in one decade is    not in another under the Constitution.  <\/p>\n<p>    Developing technology also tests the rhetoric surrounding the    right to choose. A womans right to control her own body is a    common legal and ethical argument made in favor of abortion.    Under that logic, though, the law could simply compel a woman    to put her fetus into an external womb, giving her back control    of her own body but still forcing her into parenthood.  <\/p>\n<p>    The way the law has thus far defined it, Cohen said, is that a    woman has a right to stop carrying a child. It doesnt consider    whether she also has a right to control what happens to the    child if she is no longer responsible for carrying it. It could    come down to an interpretation of what qualifies as control.  <\/p>\n<p>    If you think the reason we have abortion rights is that women    have a right to control their own bodies, this is saying you    can control your own body, just give the fetus to someone else    and theyll put it in an artificial womb, he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    How invasive the procedure to remove a fetus, Cohen said, could    influence how that all shakes out. If removing a fetus from the    womb still required surgery, for example, a woman might be able    to legally refuse surgery instead.<\/p>\n<p>    All of this may seem too hypothetical to be worth    consideringafter all, theres no telling whether the    technology that worked in lambs will translate to human babies.    And the number of women who have abortions that late into their    pregnancy is small. Somewhere around 9,090 women in the US had    abortions after their 21st week of pregnancy in 2012, accounting for just    1.3 percent of all abortions. (Many of that subset seek abortions for health    reasons. And again, new technologies would be unlikely to    impact late-stage abortions deemed necessary for the health of    a mother.)  <\/p>\n<p>    But Sandra Day OConnor was rightalready, states have been    emboldened by improving neonatal care in making laws that    restrict abortion earlier and earlier in a womans pregnancy.    Physicians, legal experts and bioethicists have long taken    issue with viability as a standard for legality. (There is a    lot of inconclusive debate about    what might make a better standard.)  <\/p>\n<p>    There have always been problems with this standard, Cohen    said. But now theres good reason to believe it could get even    worse.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See more here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/how-new-technology-could-threaten-a-womans-right-to-abo-1797339090\" title=\"How New Technology Could Threaten a Woman's Right to Abortion - Gizmodo\">How New Technology Could Threaten a Woman's Right to Abortion - Gizmodo<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> In April, scientists achieved a major breakthrough that could one day drastically improve the fate of babies born extremely prematurely. Eight premature baby lambs spent their last month of development in an external womb that resembled a high-tech ziplock bag <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/how-new-technology-could-threaten-a-womans-right-to-abortion-gizmodo\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187726],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208410"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208410"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208410\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}