{"id":208325,"date":"2017-07-28T18:45:00","date_gmt":"2017-07-28T22:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-us-team-to-gene-edit-human-embryos-revealed-science-magazine\/"},"modified":"2017-07-28T18:45:00","modified_gmt":"2017-07-28T22:45:00","slug":"first-us-team-to-gene-edit-human-embryos-revealed-science-magazine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/gene-medicine\/first-us-team-to-gene-edit-human-embryos-revealed-science-magazine\/","title":{"rendered":"First US team to gene-edit human embryos revealed &#8211; Science Magazine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        A U.S. research team has reportedly edited the DNA of a        human embryo just as a sperm fertilizes an egg, well before        its eight-cell stage.      <\/p>\n<p>      alxpin\/iStockphoto    <\/p>\n<p>    By Kelly ServickJul. 27,    2017 , 2:30 PM  <\/p>\n<p>    Since Chinese researchers announced the first gene editing of a    human embryo 2 years ago, many expected that similar work in    the United States was inevitable. Last night, the MIT    Technology Review broke the news that     such experiments have happened. The research, led by    embryologist Shoukhrat Mitalipov of Oregon Health and Science    University in Portland, also reportedly sidestepped problems of    incomplete and off-target editing that plagued previous    attempts, though details could not be confirmed since the work    is not yet published and Mitalipov has so far declined to    comment.  <\/p>\n<p>    If a peer-reviewed paper bears out the news story, Its one    more step on the path to potential clinical application, says    bioethicist Jeffrey Kahn of Johns Hopkins University in    Baltimore, Maryland, who served on a committee convened by the    U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National    Academy of Medicine in Washington, D.C., to address gene    editing. The panels report earlier this year concluded that        a clinical trial involving embryo editing would be ethically    allowable under narrow circumstances.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first published human embryoediting work, in 2015, used    nonviable embryos and targeted a gene mutated in the heritable    blood disorder beta thalassemia. But it     revealed major shortcomings in applying the increasingly    popular CRISPR gene-editing technology. The few embryos that    took up the change made by CRISPR were a patchwork of edited    and unchanged cells, and they bore unintended edits outside the    targeted gene.  <\/p>\n<p>    Another Chinese team, from Guangzhou Medical University, in    March became the first to report repairing disease-causing    mutations in viable embryos, but some still contained a patchy    mix of edited cellsa phenomenon called mosaicism. In none of    the Chinese efforts did the researchers go on to implant the    manipulated embryos in women.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sources familiar with the new work from Mitalipovs group told    the MIT Technology Review that they had produced tens    of successfully edited embryos, and had avoided the issue of    mosaicism by injecting eggs with CRISPR right as they were    fertilized with donor sperm. The Guangzhou team injected its    CRISPR system into single-celled human embryosits not yet    clear how much their timing differed from Mitalipovs. (The new    research presumably relied on nonfederal government funding,    since Congress prohibits the use of taxpayer funds on research    that destroys human embryos.)  <\/p>\n<p>    Concerns about mosaicism and off-target effects after the    published work by the Chinese teams led some to conclude that    CRISPR wasnt safe as a strategy for preventing a disease in a    baby, much less adding some enhancement. But even with the    apparent advance by the Oregon team, a U.S. clinical trial    probably isnt imminent. Its noteworthy that  theyve been    able to make some of these claims, offers Michael Werner,    executive director of the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine in    Washington, D.C., who     argued in a 2015 Nature commentary that ethical    and safety issues should put germline editing research off    limits. Its still a little premature to say that weve    resolved all these safety issues now.  <\/p>\n<p>    The NAS report notes that many inherited diseases can be    prevented by selecting healthy embryos for in vitro    fertilization, and that embryo editing might only be justified    if it presents the only option for a couple to have a healthy    biological child. Congress has meanwhile prohibited the U.S.    Food and Drug Administration from reviewing applications for    clinical trials involving embryo editing.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/news\/2017\/07\/first-us-team-gene-edit-human-embryos-revealed\" title=\"First US team to gene-edit human embryos revealed - Science Magazine\">First US team to gene-edit human embryos revealed - Science Magazine<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A U.S. research team has reportedly edited the DNA of a human embryo just as a sperm fertilizes an egg, well before its eight-cell stage. alxpin\/iStockphoto By Kelly ServickJul <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/gene-medicine\/first-us-team-to-gene-edit-human-embryos-revealed-science-magazine\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gene-medicine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208325"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}