{"id":208157,"date":"2017-07-26T16:41:08","date_gmt":"2017-07-26T20:41:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/tony-abbott-liberals-honour-bound-to-stick-with-gay-marriage-plebiscite-the-guardian\/"},"modified":"2017-07-26T16:41:08","modified_gmt":"2017-07-26T20:41:08","slug":"tony-abbott-liberals-honour-bound-to-stick-with-gay-marriage-plebiscite-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberal\/tony-abbott-liberals-honour-bound-to-stick-with-gay-marriage-plebiscite-the-guardian\/","title":{"rendered":"Tony Abbott: Liberals &#8216;honour bound&#8217; to stick with gay marriage plebiscite &#8211; The Guardian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Tony Abbott acknowledged he said the last parliament was the  final time MPs would be bound on same-sex marriage. Photograph:  Daniel Munoz\/AAP<\/p>\n<p>    Tony Abbott has    backtracked on a previous statement that Liberal MPs would not    be bound on same-sex marriage beyond the last parliament, and    he says the government must stick with the plebiscite policy    until the next election.<\/p>\n<p>    Abbott used a radio interview on Wednesday to insist the    Liberal party was    honour bound, by pledge of the Australian people, not to try    and change this matter in the parliament.  <\/p>\n<p>    He said the government had made an election commitment. If    there is to be any change in this term of parliament its got    to be by plebiscite.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Liberal party will be forced into an internal debate about    its stance on marriage equality once parliament resumes after    the winter break because the Western Australian senator Dean    Smith is bringing    forward a private members bill for consideration.  <\/p>\n<p>    With that development in mind, conservatives have been rallying    around the plebiscite ahead of an internal party debate in    August.  <\/p>\n<p>    Liberal supporters of marriage equality expected that    conservatives would resuscitate the plebiscite as part of the    renewed internal debate, either by insisting that the rejected    proposal be brought back into the parliament or pursuing a    voluntary postal plebiscite favoured by    Peter Dutton.  <\/p>\n<p>    Abbott joined the fray on Wednesday, saying the party had made    a promise at the last election. We said there would be no    change to the Marriage Act in this term of parliament without a    plebiscite, that this matter would be determined by the whole    people.  <\/p>\n<p>    Pressed on his comments made    at the end of the marathon internal Liberal party debate in    2015, where the Coalition adopted the plebiscite policy,    Abbott acknowledged that he had said the last parliament was    the final time MPs would be bound.  <\/p>\n<p>    But he said the government had gone into a subsequent election    promising the issue would be resolved by a plebiscite. Yes I    said in the last term of parliament that that would be the    final term of parliament where Liberals MPs are bound on the    issue, but we did go into that election promising a process.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its not fair enough to abandon the process.  <\/p>\n<p>    Abbott said any other interpretation of his position in 2015    currently doing the rounds was people inside the government     meaning supporters of marriage equality  being a little bit    tricky.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2015 Abbott said the following: Ive come to the view  I    believe this is the party room view  that this is the last    term in which the Coalition party room    can be bound, although we will definitely maintain the current    position for the life of this term.  <\/p>\n<p>    Going into the next election, we will finalise another    position.  <\/p>\n<p>    While conservatives will want the plebiscite to play a central    role in resolving the renewed debate triggered by the Smith    bill, bringing back the plebiscite could prove a risky    proposition on certain scenarios.  <\/p>\n<p>    Last time the parliament considered the issue, Smith was the    only Liberal MP who broke ranks and voted against the    plebiscite proposal.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is unclear whether Smith would be the only break away vote    in the event the plebiscite returned for fresh parliamentary    consideration. It is possible that some other Liberal    supporters of marriage equality could join the public    opposition to the proposal.  <\/p>\n<p>    Smith, and the longtime marriage equality campaigner Warren    Entsch, have both publicly argued this week against the Dutton    proposal  a postal plebiscite.  <\/p>\n<p>    Entsch said    at the start of the week: The fact that a plebiscite of    any form, whether it be postal or otherwise, is not binding I    think really puts the final nail in the coffin in relation to    any concept of a plebiscite and thats not going to change with    a ... postal plebiscite.  <\/p>\n<p>    Smith said plebiscites were the radical way of resolving    policy issues in the Australian democratic practice.  <\/p>\n<p>    He said he opposed them as a traditional conservative.  <\/p>\n<p>    More than that, postal plebiscites, national plebiscites are    corrosive, corrosive to our parliamentary democracy.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/australia-news\/2017\/jul\/26\/tony-abbott-liberals-honour-bound-to-stick-with-gay-marriage-plebiscite\" title=\"Tony Abbott: Liberals 'honour bound' to stick with gay marriage plebiscite - The Guardian\">Tony Abbott: Liberals 'honour bound' to stick with gay marriage plebiscite - The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Tony Abbott acknowledged he said the last parliament was the final time MPs would be bound on same-sex marriage.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberal\/tony-abbott-liberals-honour-bound-to-stick-with-gay-marriage-plebiscite-the-guardian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187824],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208157"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208157"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208157\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}