{"id":208137,"date":"2017-07-26T16:35:54","date_gmt":"2017-07-26T20:35:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/how-congress-can-protect-marylands-offshore-wind-projects-natural-resources-defense-council\/"},"modified":"2017-07-26T16:35:54","modified_gmt":"2017-07-26T20:35:54","slug":"how-congress-can-protect-marylands-offshore-wind-projects-natural-resources-defense-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/how-congress-can-protect-marylands-offshore-wind-projects-natural-resources-defense-council\/","title":{"rendered":"How Congress Can Protect Maryland&#8217;s Offshore Wind Projects &#8211; Natural Resources Defense Council"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Why would Congressman Andy    Harris (R-MD1) want to stand in the way of bringing clean,    renewable offshore wind power to his home state of Maryland by    trying to stop two projects that would create nearly 10,000    good jobs and revitalize Marylands ports? This is the question    that Maryland citizens should be asking after Rep. Harris    inserted an amendment into the 2018 House Interior-EPA spending    package last week that would imperil the first two offshore    wind projects that Maryland has approved.  <\/p>\n<p>      Deepwater      Wind    <\/p>\n<p>    With the support of Republican Governor Larry Hogan, Maryland    is moving ahead with an ambitious offshore wind program. In    May, after a lengthy review process that offered a wide range    of opportunities for public participation, the Maryland Public    Service Commission (PSC)     gave the green light to two offshore wind projects to be    located in federal waters off the Maryland and Delaware coasts.    Environmentalists and many in Marylands business and labor    communities have been big boosters.  <\/p>\n<p>    The projects are being developed by two separate companies:    U.S. Wind and Deepwater Wind. U.S. Wind plans a 248-megawatt    project to be located at least 17 miles east of Ocean City,    Maryland. Deepwaters project would include 15 turbines and    would be sited at least 19.5 miles from shore and 26 miles from    the Ocean City Pier. Both projects will be subject to the    federal governments Bureau of Ocean Energy Management    permitting and environmental review process. Together, they can    generate enough renewable electricity to power more than    100,000 homes and can create almost 9,700 Maryland jobs. They    can add $74 million in tax revenue over the next 20 years, will    result in more than $1.8 billion in in-state investment, and    will help make the areas electric supply more reliable and    resilient. As part of     a package of conditions required by the Maryland PSC, U.S.    Wind and Deepwater have also agreed to: (1) use port facilities    in the Baltimore region and in Ocean City for construction,    operations and maintenance; (2) a joint investment of at least    $76 million in a steel fabrication plant in Maryland; and, (3)    finance almost $40 million in upgrades to the Tradepoint    Atlantic Shipyard in Baltimore County.  <\/p>\n<p>    By jumpstarting offshore wind power in Maryland, these projects    can help the state earn the important first-mover advantage in    the growing offshore wind power industry that is now gaining    traction along the East Coast. Last December, off Rhode Island,    the nations first offshore wind power project came online,        the Block Island Wind Farm. In Massachusetts, Republican    Governor Charlie Baker has signed     legislation that will bring 1,600 megawatts of offshore    wind power to the Bay State by 2027. New York State plans to    get     2,400 megawatts by 2030enough to power 1.25 million homes.    And Virginia is involved, too, with utility Dominion Energy    Virginia two weeks ago announcing a plan to build a     12-megawatt project in nearby federal waters. Whichever    state moves fastest and furthest in attracting the needed port    and supply facilities will also be the first to reap the    benefits from an industry that can employ as many as 160,000    by 2050, the U.S. Department of Energy estimates.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rep. Harris rider would stop the use of federal funding for    reviewing site assessments or construction plans for turbines    located within 24 nautical miles of the Maryland shoreline.    This would imperil at least one, if not both, of these    projects. Harris maintains that the projects could impact    tourists enjoyment of the beaches in Ocean City, Maryland.    Thats hard to credit. Both projects will be located so far    from shore that they will be hard to see under most conditions.    And the Deepwater project, 26 miles northeast of Ocean City,    will barely be visible, if at all. The Maryland Public Service    Commission has already required U.S. Wind, the developer of the    larger project, to locate its turbines as far away from shore    as possible and has required that each developer to use the    best available technology to    lessen views of the wind turbines by beach-goers and residents,    both during the day and at night. Any remaining concerns    about visibility can be addressed as part of the upcoming    federal environmental review and permitting process.  <\/p>\n<p>    Maryland has crafted a well-thought-out, bipartisan plan to    advance offshore wind responsibly, a plan the Harris amendment    now endangers. But the harm from the amendment, if it becomes    law, could be broader and impact the U.S. offshore wind    industry as a whole by disrupting investor confidence. That    would be a grave mistake. Both Republican and Democratic    governors want to move forward with offshore wind power, as    does U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Zinke, who has    called offshore wind one    tool in the all-of-the-above energy toolbox that will help    power America with domestic energy, securing energy    independence, and bolstering the economy. Under Secretary    Zinkes watch, the federal government moved ahead this year    with awarding offshore wind leases in the waters off North    Carolina.  <\/p>\n<p>    An irrational, last-minute amendment in a little-discussed    appropriations bill shouldnt stand in the way of the    development of a major new source of American-made renewable    energy, renewable energy that has a promising level of    bipartisan support. Neither should this amendment jeopardize    the infrastructure jobs that offshore wind power can create.    Congress should ensure that Harris damaging amendment does not    become law.  <\/p>\n<p>          Director, Energy & Transportation program        <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nrdc.org\/experts\/kit-kennedy\/congress-should-stop-rider-would-stop-md-offshore-wind\" title=\"How Congress Can Protect Maryland's Offshore Wind Projects - Natural Resources Defense Council\">How Congress Can Protect Maryland's Offshore Wind Projects - Natural Resources Defense Council<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Why would Congressman Andy Harris (R-MD1) want to stand in the way of bringing clean, renewable offshore wind power to his home state of Maryland by trying to stop two projects that would create nearly 10,000 good jobs and revitalize Marylands ports? This is the question that Maryland citizens should be asking after Rep. Harris inserted an amendment into the 2018 House Interior-EPA spending package last week that would imperil the first two offshore wind projects that Maryland has approved <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/how-congress-can-protect-marylands-offshore-wind-projects-natural-resources-defense-council\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187814],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-offshore"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208137"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}