{"id":207929,"date":"2017-07-26T01:44:04","date_gmt":"2017-07-26T05:44:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/we-have-unrealistic-expectations-of-a-tech-driven-future-utopia-recode\/"},"modified":"2017-07-26T01:44:04","modified_gmt":"2017-07-26T05:44:04","slug":"we-have-unrealistic-expectations-of-a-tech-driven-future-utopia-recode","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-utopia\/we-have-unrealistic-expectations-of-a-tech-driven-future-utopia-recode\/","title":{"rendered":"We have unrealistic expectations of a tech-driven future utopia &#8211; Recode"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A version of this essay was originally published at    Tech.pinions,    a website dedicated to informed opinions, insight and    perspective on the tech industry.  <\/p>\n<p>    No one likes to think about limits, especially in the tech    industry, where the idea of putting constraints on almost    anything is perceived as anathema.  <\/p>\n<p>    In fact, the entire tech industry is arguably built on the    concept of bursting through limitations and enabling things    that werent possible before. New technology developments have    clearly created incredible new capabilities and opportunities,    and have generally helped improve the world around us.  <\/p>\n<p>    But there does come a point  and I think weve arrived there     where its worth stepping back to both think about and talk    about the potential value of, yes, technology limits ... on    several different levels.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the positive side, theres a sense that technologies like    AI or autonomous driving are going to solve enormous societal    issues in a matter of a few years.  <\/p>\n<p>    On a technical level, weve reached a point where advances in    computing applications like AI, or medical applications like    gene splicing, are raising even more ethical questions than    practical ones on issues such as how they work and for what    applications they might be used. Not surprisingly, there arent    any clear or easy answers to these questions, and its going to    take a lot more time and thought to create frameworks or    guidelines for both the appropriate and inappropriate uses of    these potentially life-changing technologies.  <\/p>\n<p>    Does this mean these kinds of technological advances should be    stopped? Of course not. But having more discourse on the types    of technologies that get created and released certainly needs    to happen.  <\/p>\n<p>    Even on a practical level, the need for limiting peoples    expectations about what a technology can or cannot do is    becoming increasingly important. With science-fiction-like    advances becoming daily occurrences, its easy to fall into the    trap that there are no limits to what a given technology can    do. As a result, people are increasingly willing to believe and    accept almost any kind of     statements or predictions about the future of many increasingly    well-known technologies, from autonomous driving to VR to    AI and machine learning. I hate to say it, but its the fake    news of tech.  <\/p>\n<p>    Just as weve seen the fallout from fake news on all sides of    the political perspective, so, too, are we starting to see that    unbridled and unlimited expectations for certain new    technologies are starting to have     negative implications of their own. Essentially, were    starting to build unrealistic expectations for a tech-driven    nirvana that doesnt clearly jibe with the realities of the    modern world, particularly in the time frames that are often    discussed.  <\/p>\n<p>    In fact, Id argue that a lot of the current perspectives on    where the technology industry is and where its headed are    based on a variety of false pretenses, some positively biased    and some negatively biased. On the positive side, theres a    sense that technologies like AI or autonomous driving are going    to solve enormous societal issues in a matter of a few years.    On the negative side, there are some who see the tech industry    as being in a stagnant period, still hunting for the next big    thing beyond the smartphone.  <\/p>\n<p>    Neither perspective is accurate, but ironically, both stem from    the same myth of limitlessness that seems to pervade much of    the thinking in the tech industry. For those with the positive    spin, I think its critical to be willing to admit to a    technologys limitations, in addition to touting its    capabilities.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the negative side, there are some who see the tech    industry as being in a stagnant period, still hunting for the    next big thing beyond the smartphone.  <\/p>\n<p>    So, for example, its okay to talk about the benefits that    something like autonomous driving can bring to certain people    in certain environments, but its equally important to    acknowledge that it isnt going to be a great fit for everyone,    everywhere. Realistically and practically speaking, we are    still a very long way from having a physical, legal, economic    and political environment for autonomous cars to dramatically    impact the transportation needs of most consumers. On the other    hand, the ability for these autonomous transportation    technologies to start having a dramatic impact on public    transportation systems or shipping fleets over the next several    years seems much more realistic (even if it is a lot less    sexy).  <\/p>\n<p>    For those with a more negative bias, its important to    recognize that not all technologies have to be universally    applicable to make them useful or successful. The newly    relaunched Google Glass, for example, is no longer trying    to be the next-generation computing device and industry    disruptor that it was initially thought to be. Instead, its    being focused on (or limited to) work-based applications, where        its a great fit. As a result, it wont see the kind of    sales figures that something like an iPhone will, but thats    okay, because its actually doing what it is best designed to    do.  <\/p>\n<p>    Accepting and publicly acknowledging that certain technologies    cant do some things isnt a form of weakness  its a form of    strength. In fact, it creates a more realistic scenario for    them to succeed. Similarly, recognizing that while some    technologies are great, they may not be great for everything,    doesnt mean theyre a failure. Some technologies and products    can be great for certain sub-segments of the market and still    be both a technical and financial success.  <\/p>\n<p>    If, however, we keep thinking that every new technology or tech    industry concept can be endlessly extended without limits     everything in my life as service, really?  were bound to be    greatly disappointed on many different levels. Instead, if we    view them within a more limited and, in some cases more    specialized, scope, then were much more likely to accurately    judge what they can (or cannot) do and set expectations    accordingly. Thats not a limit, its a value.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bob    ODonnell is the founder and chief analyst of    Technalysis    Research LLC, a technology consulting and market    research firm that provides strategic consulting and market    research services to the technology industry and professional    financial community. Reach him @bobodtech.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.recode.net\/2017\/7\/25\/16026870\/technology-advances-limits-ethics-vr-ai-autonomous-google-glass\" title=\"We have unrealistic expectations of a tech-driven future utopia - Recode\">We have unrealistic expectations of a tech-driven future utopia - Recode<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A version of this essay was originally published at Tech.pinions, a website dedicated to informed opinions, insight and perspective on the tech industry. No one likes to think about limits, especially in the tech industry, where the idea of putting constraints on almost anything is perceived as anathema <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-utopia\/we-have-unrealistic-expectations-of-a-tech-driven-future-utopia-recode\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187819],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-utopia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207929"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207929"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207929\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}