I recently took the photo that accompanies todays column on Swick Road off Route 89 in Romulus. <\/p>\n
A woman contacted the Finger Lakes Times about the property. She found it offensive and thought it might even be illegal in New York. She says the resident claims to be a deer hunter. She has reported it to the town of Romulus and Seneca County officials. <\/p>\n
It is likely not illegal, that is, unless it is regarded as a hate crime or hate speech against blacks being a reference to approval of lynching by the KKK. Then it is not just an ordinary rope. <\/p>\n
If we give the home owner the benefit of the doubt, then the question is why keep the nooses hanging year-round knowing they might connote negative impressions to others? <\/p>\n
For me, its just another instance of a pervasive attitude that seems to be taking shape culturally all over, where people just are going to do what they want regardless of right, wrong or political correctness. <\/p>\n
Some might argue that this type of social and political climate is the result of Novembers presidential election. But the reality is what happens locally more often has a greater affect on peoples lives than anything nationally. And that includes politically. <\/p>\n
The photo certainly raises First Amendment issues on both sides of the coin. <\/p>\n
Briefly the First Amendment says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. <\/p>\n
For me the First Amendment has very much become a focal point for things happening in the Finger Lakes region. <\/p>\n
Lets take a look at the Geneva City Council. Not too long ago Mayor Alcock tried to move the public comment portion of the monthly meeting from the beginning of the session to the end. Since no ones knows how long each council meeting takes, often hours, I feel it was a clever way to stifle the voice of the public. <\/p>\n
It was ultimately decided, however, to allow comments at the end and at the beginning with strict time limits imposed. <\/p>\n
But that is nothing compared to what the Council did a couple of months ago. Its hard for me to wrap my head around the fact that a new rule was put into place that does not allow members of the public to address council members by name with their issues or complaints. <\/p>\n
One of the guidelines from the current Rules and Procedures for Geneva City Council requires that All remarks shall be addressed to City Council as a whole and not to any individual member thereof. <\/p>\n
I remind everyone it is 2017. <\/p>\n
What may be a great example of political hypocrisy happened at a fairly recent meeting. Councilman Paul DAmico raised his concerns and was critical of city resident Jim Meaney and his website Geneva Believer, which often challenges the actions of Geneva city government. This when Meaney, who was at the meeting, was unable to directly address DAmico. <\/p>\n
For a more detailed look at this issue go to genevabeliever.wordpress.com\/author\/geneva believer. <\/p>\n
Now lets look at Seneca Falls Town Board meetings. Not only are signs banned from being brought into the meetings but if someone has a visual aid to show at the podium during their allotted time they are prevented from presenting it. <\/p>\n
As a way to further restrict the publics right to free expression, they are holding the latest meetings in a room that only fits 80 people. <\/p>\n
I have gone to several of the board meetings regarding the landfill issue. People certainly are passionate about the issue but never did I find it out of control nor inappropriate. Since the space in the new municipal building can only hold 80 people why not move the meetings to a larger venue that can accommodate more people if there is that much interest in an issue? <\/p>\n
In a move that I feel is solely about control, a new rule also is now in place in Seneca Falls that does not allow anyone to stand unless speaking at the podium. <\/p>\n
Again, I remind everyone it is 2017. <\/p>\n
In Yates County the race for district attorney is once again getting down and dirty. Free speech is one thing but when one opponent distributes what are being considered false allegations against his opponent is another thing all together. That same candidate filed sworn statements under oath that his residency is at one address, and the petitions he filed state he lives at a completely different address a big no-no. <\/p>\n
I cant leave Wayne County out. Even though New York State guidelines clearly state in Article 3 Election Officials, Statewide Provisions that local election officials are to establish rules allowing the admission of news media representatives to the area of the polling place where the canvass of ballots cast can be directly observed, the county Board of Elections has banned photographers from polling places the past few election days. <\/p>\n
Once again, I remind everyone it is 2017. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the article here: I recently took the photo that accompanies todays column on Swick Road off Route 89 in Romulus. A woman contacted the Finger Lakes Times about the property Continue reading
\nTHE BIGGER PICTURE: First Amendment issues - Finger Lakes Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"