{"id":207576,"date":"2017-07-25T11:46:44","date_gmt":"2017-07-25T15:46:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/tomorrow-night-regent-college-adam-and-the-genome-patheos-blog\/"},"modified":"2017-07-25T11:46:44","modified_gmt":"2017-07-25T15:46:44","slug":"tomorrow-night-regent-college-adam-and-the-genome-patheos-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/tomorrow-night-regent-college-adam-and-the-genome-patheos-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Tomorrow Night, Regent College, Adam and the Genome &#8211; Patheos (blog)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Since 1982 the Gallup Poll [a repost of RJSs post because    tomorrow night Dennis and I will be giving a public lecture at    Regent College(Vancouver) on our    project] has been asking Americans about their views on    evolution and human origins. This week they released the    results of their most recent survey conducted in early May of    this year (here). The question posed    (with the order of options randomized):  <\/p>\n<p>      Which of the following statements comes closest to your views      on the origin and development of human beings:    <\/p>\n<p>    The answers have    changed modestly over the last 35 years, with the most    significant change an increase in the percentage of those who    are comfortable with no guidance at all. This has increased    from 9 to 19% over the years, with a concomitant decrease in    those who see God involved in the process in one way or    another. The plot to the right summarizes the data reported    by Gallup. Ive added error bars    at the +\/- 4% level reported for the current poll as this helps    to clarify the reliability of the results.  <\/p>\n<p>    The latest poll is noteworthy in that it marks the first time    that creation in their present form within the last 10000    years was not the clear favorite and the first time this    response dropped below 40%. Whether this is a blip (similar to    the dip in 2010) or represents a trend remains to be seen. It    is encouraging, however, that the drop in the young creation    view is countered by an increase in those comfortable with God    guiding development over millions of years rather than an    increase in the no guidance position.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Gallup    report analyzes these results according to religious views,    church attendance, and education level. There are no real    surprises here  those who attend church regularly are far more    likely to agree choose the young creation view (65% of weekly    attenders). The results also correlate strongly with education.    The difference between the respondents with and without a    college degree is striking. Postgraduate education has a    smaller influence.  <\/p>\n<p>    Is a change afoot? An enormous number    of book have been published over the last decade wrestling with    the questions of evolution and Christian faith. Ive reviewed    or commented on several dozen books on this blog, with more on    the way (I am not sure of the exact number Ive read and    reviewed  I stopped counting and returned to writing this post    when I passed 36 on the shelves in my study). I am currently    working through Adam and the    Genome, Evolution and the    Fall, Science and    Christianity, and The Emergence of    Personhood, three of which focus on the    questions raised by human evolution.  <\/p>\n<p>    Most of the books that have been, and are being, published work    through the theological and biblical questions raised by    evolution. This is significant. As a church we are digging into    the important questions. These book are being published (often    by relatively conservative Christian publishers) and are being    read. At the recent BioLogos conference, one author noted that    publishers who shied away from his work a decade ago as too    controversial are approaching him about the possibility of    publishing his next book.  <\/p>\n<p>    Although resistance remains, I have found far more willingness    to listen and understand than was common a decade ago. Dennis    Venema recently made a similar observation on a post at    BioLogos: A Decade of Evolutionary Creation:    Milestones and Signposts.  <\/p>\n<p>    Evolutionary creation is a viable option for understanding and    making sense of Gods world.  <\/p>\n<p>    Do you think there is an increased openness to    evolutionary creation?  <\/p>\n<p>    If so, what is driving this change?  <\/p>\n<p>    If you wish to contact me directly you may do so at rjs4mail    [at] att.net.  <\/p>\n<p>    If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts    at Musings on Science and Theology.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2017\/07\/25\/tomorrow-night-regent-college-adam-genome\/\" title=\"Tomorrow Night, Regent College, Adam and the Genome - Patheos (blog)\">Tomorrow Night, Regent College, Adam and the Genome - Patheos (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Since 1982 the Gallup Poll [a repost of RJSs post because tomorrow night Dennis and I will be giving a public lecture at Regent College(Vancouver) on our project] has been asking Americans about their views on evolution and human origins. This week they released the results of their most recent survey conducted in early May of this year (here).  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/tomorrow-night-regent-college-adam-and-the-genome-patheos-blog\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207576"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}