{"id":207403,"date":"2017-07-24T07:58:25","date_gmt":"2017-07-24T11:58:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/6-incidents-unmasking-social-media-giants-as-enemies-of-free-speech-townhall\/"},"modified":"2017-07-24T07:58:25","modified_gmt":"2017-07-24T11:58:25","slug":"6-incidents-unmasking-social-media-giants-as-enemies-of-free-speech-townhall","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/6-incidents-unmasking-social-media-giants-as-enemies-of-free-speech-townhall\/","title":{"rendered":"6 Incidents Unmasking Social Media Giants as Enemies of Free Speech &#8211; Townhall"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        |      <\/p>\n<p>        Posted: Jul 24, 2017 12:01 AM      <\/p>\n<p>    Hate speech is not free speech, the Left increasingly insists     particularly on college and university campuses. In my new    book The    Complete Infidels Guide to Free Speech (and Its    Enemies), I show why the very concept of hate speech    is a scam. Here are the top seven:  <\/p>\n<p>    1. Twitter decides who has the    right to hate speech  <\/p>\n<p>    Consider, for example, what Twitter does not consider    to be hate speech. A Muslim named Obaid Karki, @stsheetrock    on Twitter, runs a website headed Obaid Karki St.Sheetrocks    Painfulpolitics Offensive Comedy Hepcat and another called    Suicide Bombers Magazine. He posted this on one of them in    late May 2016, just before the European Union and the social    media sites announced their new agreement: Robert Spencer    mustnt [be] featured but lynched  <\/p>\n<p>    Karkis posted this call for me to be lynched on Twitter. But    Twitter refused to delete his account or even remove the    threatening tweets.  <\/p>\n<p>    2. Social Media blocks the truth by deeming it hate    speech  <\/p>\n<p>    Videogame developer Mark Kern was suspended from Twitter for    writing, I dont see why mosques with radical leanings should    be excluded from surveillance when the rest of us get our    emails collected by the NSA. The administrator of a proDonald    Trump Facebook group was banned for arguing that Trump was not    anti-Muslim but anti-ISIS.  <\/p>\n<p>    In early February 2017, they came for me.  <\/p>\n<p>    On February 7, 2017, referrals to my website, Jihad Watch, from    Facebook numbered 23,783, and from Twitter, 1,718. These    numbers were generally representative: referrals from Facebook    for several years up to that point had averaged between 15,000    and 20,000 a day, and 1,500 to 2,000 a day from Twitter. But on    February 10, 2017, those numbers dropped suddenly and    precipitously, with only 2,923 referrals from Facebook and 295    from Twitter. Thats around where they have held since then: on    March 20, 2017, there were 1,954 referrals from Facebook and    241 from Twitter.  <\/p>\n<p>    Did thousands of people who used to click through to Jihad    Watch articles from Facebook and Twitter suddenly lose interest    on February 10, 2017? Of course not. What happened on that day    was that Facebook and Twitter began to censor Jihad Watch as    hate speech, in accordance with the assurances they had given    to the European Union.  <\/p>\n<p>    Blocking the Truth  <\/p>\n<p>    Facebook, immediately after concluding an agreement with the    European Union, began moving aggressively against foes of jihad    terror and mass Muslim migration in the West. Nina Rosenwald,    the president and founder of the conservative think tank    Gatestone Institute, on June 2, 2016 recorded Facebooks haste    to implement the new speech regulations: On Tuesday, the    European Union (EU) announced a new online speech code to be    enforced by four major tech companies, including Facebook and    YouTube. On Wednesday, Facebook deleted the account of Ingrid    Carlqvist, Gatestones Swedish expert.  <\/p>\n<p>    Carlqvists crime, according to Rosenwald, was to take note of    real crimes by Muslim migrants: Ingrid had posted our latest    video to her Facebook feedcalled Swedens Migrant Rape    Epidemic. In that video, said Rosenwald, Ingrid calmly lays    out the facts and statistics, all of which are meticulously    researched. Rosenwald added that the video was adapted from a    research paper that Gatestone published last year. The video    has gone viralracking up more than 80,000 views in its first    two days. But the EU is quite candid: it is applying a    political lens to their censorship....   <\/p>\n<p>    Facebook banning anti-jihad opinions  <\/p>\n<p>    Facebook banned the page of a gay magazine, Gaystream, after it    published an article by David Berger, its editor-in-chief,    criticizing German gay activists and leftists for ignoring the    Islamic root causes of the Orlando jihad massacre. Berger    wrote, Whoever had thought the culmination of masochism and    Islam-appeasement by left-green professional homosexuals was    already achieved, will now be mistaken: it becomes even more    masochistic and perverse.  <\/p>\n<p>    5. Deleting jihad    awareness  <\/p>\n<p>    In July 2016, YouTube also invoked hate speech criteria,    which supposedly it had developed as a tool to use against    jihad recruiting videos, to delete a video critical of    non-violent Muslim Brotherhood efforts to advance Sharia in the    West.  <\/p>\n<p>    6. The immunity of the censorship    of certain social media groups explain a lot  <\/p>\n<p>    On July 13, 2016, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) filed    a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District    of Columbia, on behalf of Pamela Gellers American Freedom    Defense Initiative (AFDI), of which I am vice president,    challenging Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act    (CDA), which grants Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube immunity    from lawsuits, and thus makes it impossible to challenge their    consistent bias against foes of jihad terror and tolerance of    jihad terror activity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Section 230 of the CDA explicitly immunizes Facebook, Twitter,    and YouTube from challenges to anything they do to restrict    access to or availability of material that that they deem    obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent,    harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such    material is constitutionally protected.  <\/p>\n<p>    David Yerushalmi, AFLC co-founder and senior counsel, added,    Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have notoriously censored    speech that they deem critical of Islam, thereby effectively    enforcing blasphemy laws here in the United States with the    assistance of the federal government. It has been the top    agenda item of Islamic supremacists to impose such standards on    the West.... Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are falling in    line, and we seek to stop this assault on our First Amendment    freedoms.  <\/p>\n<p>    Robert Spencer is the director of    Jihad    Watchand author of the New    York Times bestsellers     The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the    Crusades)and        The Truth About    Muhammad. His latest book    is     The Complete Infidels Guide to Free Speech (and Its    Enemies). Follow him on    Twitter here.    Like him on Facebook here.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/townhall.com\/columnists\/robertspencer\/2017\/07\/24\/6-incidents-unmasking-social-media-giants-as-enemies-of-free-speech-n2357857\" title=\"6 Incidents Unmasking Social Media Giants as Enemies of Free Speech - Townhall\">6 Incidents Unmasking Social Media Giants as Enemies of Free Speech - Townhall<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> | Posted: Jul 24, 2017 12:01 AM Hate speech is not free speech, the Left increasingly insists particularly on college and university campuses. In my new book The Complete Infidels Guide to Free Speech (and Its Enemies), I show why the very concept of hate speech is a scam.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/6-incidents-unmasking-social-media-giants-as-enemies-of-free-speech-townhall\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207403"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}