{"id":206608,"date":"2017-07-20T02:50:55","date_gmt":"2017-07-20T06:50:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-contents-supreme-court-interpretations\/"},"modified":"2017-07-20T02:50:55","modified_gmt":"2017-07-20T06:50:55","slug":"first-amendment-contents-supreme-court-interpretations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/first-amendment-contents-supreme-court-interpretations\/","title":{"rendered":"First Amendment | Contents &amp; Supreme Court Interpretations &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    First    Amendment,     amendment (1791) to the     Constitution of the United States that is part of    the     Bill of Rights and reads,  <\/p>\n<p>      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of      religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or      abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the      right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition      the Government for a redress of grievances.    <\/p>\n<p>    The clauses of the amendment are    often called the     establishment clause, the free exercise clause, the    free speech clause, the free press clause, the assembly clause,    and the petition clause.  <\/p>\n<p>    The First Amendment, like the rest of the Bill of Rights,    originally restricted only what the federal government may do    and did not bind the states. Most state constitutions had their    own bills of rights, and those generally included provisions    similar to those found in the First Amendment. But the state    provisions could be enforced only by state courts.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 1868, however, the Fourteenth    Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, and it    prohibited states from denying people liberty without    due    process. Since then the     U.S. Supreme Court has gradually used the due    process clause to apply most of the Bill of Rights to state    governments. In particular, from the 1920s to the 40s the    Supreme Court applied all the clauses of the First Amendment to    the states. Thus, the First Amendment now covers actions by    federal, state, and local governments. The First Amendment also    applies to all branches of government, including legislatures,    courts, juries, and executive officials and agencies. This    includes public employers, public university systems, and    public school systems.  <\/p>\n<p>    The First Amendment, however, applies only to restrictions    imposed by the government, since the First and Fourteenth    amendments refer only to government action. As    a result, if a private employer fires an employee because of    the employees speech, there is no First Amendment violation.    There is likewise no violation if a private university expels a    student for what the student said, if a commercial landlord    restricts what bumper stickers are sold on the property it    owns, or if an     Internet service provider refuses to host certain    Web sites.  <\/p>\n<p>    Legislatures sometimes enact laws that protect speakers or    religious observers from retaliation by private organizations.    For example, Title VII of the federal     Civil Rights Act of 1964 bans religious discrimination even by private employers.    Similarly, laws in some states prohibit employers from firing    employees for off-duty political activity. But such    prohibitions are imposed by legislative choice rather than by    the First Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The freedoms    of speech, of the press,    of assembly, and to petitiondiscussed here together as freedom    of expressionbroadly protect expression from    governmental restrictions. Thus, for instance, the government    may not outlaw antiwar speech, speech praising     violence,     racist speech, pro-communist    speech, and the like. Nor may the government impose special    taxes on speech on certain topics or limit demonstrations that    express certain views. The government also may not authorize    civil lawsuits based on peoples speech, unless the speech    falls within a traditionally recognized First Amendment    exception. This is why, for example, people may not sue for    emotional distress inflicted by offensive magazine articles    about them, unless the articles are not just offensive but    include false statements that fall within the     defamation exception (see below         Permissible restrictions on expression).  <\/p>\n<p>    The free expression guarantees are not limited to political    speech. They also cover speech about science, religion,    morality,    and social issues as well as art and even personal gossip.  <\/p>\n<p>    Test Your Knowledge  <\/p>\n<p>      Infamous Nazis    <\/p>\n<p>    Freedom of the press confirms that the government may not    restrict mass communication. It does not, however, give media    businesses any additional constitutional rights beyond what    nonprofessional speakers have.  <\/p>\n<p>    Freedom of petition protects the right to communicate with    government officials. This includes     lobbying government officials and petitioning the    courts by filing lawsuits, unless the court concludes that the    lawsuit clearly lacks any legal basis.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Here is the original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/First-Amendment\" title=\"First Amendment | Contents &amp; Supreme Court Interpretations ...\">First Amendment | Contents &amp; Supreme Court Interpretations ...<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> First Amendment, amendment (1791) to the Constitution of the United States that is part of the Bill of Rights and reads, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The clauses of the amendment are often called the establishment clause, the free exercise clause, the free speech clause, the free press clause, the assembly clause, and the petition clause <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/first-amendment-contents-supreme-court-interpretations\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94877],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206608"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}