{"id":20628,"date":"2014-01-01T02:43:46","date_gmt":"2014-01-01T07:43:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/the-value-of-museum-collections-for-development-of-dna-barcode-libraries\/"},"modified":"2014-01-01T02:43:46","modified_gmt":"2014-01-01T07:43:46","slug":"the-value-of-museum-collections-for-development-of-dna-barcode-libraries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/the-value-of-museum-collections-for-development-of-dna-barcode-libraries\/","title":{"rendered":"The value of museum collections for development of DNA barcode libraries"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Dec. 30, 2013  The ability to sequence  the DNA of plants and animals has revolutionized many areas of  biology, but the unstable character of DNA poses difficulties for  sequencing specimens in museum collection over time. In an  attempt to answer these issues, a recent study of 31 target  spider species from the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden,  discovers that both time and body size are significant factors in  determining which specimens can produce DNA barcode sequences.<\/p>\n<p>    The study was published in a special issue of the open access    journal ZooKeys.  <\/p>\n<p>    The specimens contained in the world's natural history museums    are the basis for most of what scientists know about    biodiversity. Much like libraries, natural history museums are    responsible for the long term preservation of their collections    while circulating loans to active scientists. Museum curation    techniques were developed over hundreds of years and optimized    for anatomical preservation, and are often not ideal for    preserving tissues for DNA sequencing.  <\/p>\n<p>    DNA barcoding is an approach to the study of biodiversity that    involves sequencing a standard region from the genome of an    unidentified specimen and comparing it to a library of    identified reference sequences representing many species. The    success of this approach is in part dependent on the    completeness of the library of reference sequences. When    building such a reference library, specimens must either be    freshly collected or taken from an existing collection.  <\/p>\n<p>    The question addressed in this study is can we predict which    specimens in a museum collection are likely to yield a    successful DNA barcode sequence? If so, we can optimize our    resources, wisely select museum specimens to sequence, and plan    fresh collections to supplement. This study focused on Dutch    spiders.  <\/p>\n<p>    31 target species that have been frequently collected in the    Netherlands over several decades and deposited in the Naturalis    Biodiversity Center in Leiden were selected. For each target    species, a series of increasingly older specimens was selected    and brought to the lab for DNA sequencing. This was    supplemented with freshly collected material representing    nearly 150 Dutch spider species. The scientists recorded which    specimens successfully produced DNA barcode sequences and which    failed. They also experimented with DNA extraction techniques.  <\/p>\n<p>    Typically, DNA extraction begins with the removal of muscle    tissue; this is destructive extraction. An alternative approach    is to soak the specimen in a solution that releases DNA from    cells but does little or no damage to anatomy; this is    nondestructive extraction. They found that failure rates for    DNA barcode sequencing rise with time since collection, but    body size is also a significant factor.  <\/p>\n<p>    For freshly collected specimens overall, body size is not a    predictor of sequencing success or failure. But larger species    have a longer DNA barcoding shelf life than smaller species.    Nondestructuve extraction techniques can significantly improve    the chances of obtaining a DNA barcode sequence. Considering    only the commonly applied destructive extraction method, small    spiders are useful for only a few years while those with a body    length of around 3 mm or more have a good chance of yielding a    barcode sequence for about 20 years after collection.  <\/p>\n<p>    But using nondestructive extraction, even small spiders with a    body length of 4 mm or less have a good chance of yielding a    DNA barcode sequence for about 15 years after collection while    spiders above this size can yield barcode sequences for a    considerably longer time. The success of nondestructive    extraction demonstrated here coupled with the need to preserve    museum specimens for a variety of research purposes bodes well    for museum collections are source material for DNA barcode    libraries.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2013\/12\/131230135044.htm\" title=\"The value of museum collections for development of DNA barcode libraries\">The value of museum collections for development of DNA barcode libraries<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Dec. 30, 2013 The ability to sequence the DNA of plants and animals has revolutionized many areas of biology, but the unstable character of DNA poses difficulties for sequencing specimens in museum collection over time. In an attempt to answer these issues, a recent study of 31 target spider species from the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, discovers that both time and body size are significant factors in determining which specimens can produce DNA barcode sequences <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/the-value-of-museum-collections-for-development-of-dna-barcode-libraries\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20628"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20628\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}