{"id":206194,"date":"2017-07-18T04:02:37","date_gmt":"2017-07-18T08:02:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liu-xiaobo-a-voice-of-freedom-cato-institute-blog\/"},"modified":"2017-07-18T04:02:37","modified_gmt":"2017-07-18T08:02:37","slug":"liu-xiaobo-a-voice-of-freedom-cato-institute-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/liu-xiaobo-a-voice-of-freedom-cato-institute-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Liu Xiaobo: A Voice of Freedom &#8211; Cato Institute (blog)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The death of Liu Xiaobo from liver cancer on    July 13, under guard at a hospital in Shenyang, marks the    passing of a great defender of freedoma man who was willing to    speak truth to power. As the lead signatory to Charter 08,    which called for the rule of law and constitutional government,    Liu was sentenced to 11 years in prison for inciting the    subversion of state power. Before his sentencing in 2009, Liu    stood before the court and declared, To block freedom of    speech is to trample on human rights, to strangle humanity, and    to suppress the truth. With proper treatment and freedom, Liu    would have lived on to voice his support for a free    society.  <\/p>\n<p>    While Lius advocacy of limited government,    democracy, and a free market for ideas won him the Nobel Peace    Prize in 2010, Chinas leadership viewed him as a criminal and    refused to allow him to travel to Oslo to receive the award.    Instead, the prize was placed on an empty chair at the    ceremony, a lasting symbol of Lius courage in the face of    state suppression. Beijing also prevented liberal Mao Yushi,    cofounder of the Unirule Institute, from attending the ceremony    to honor Liu.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    IdealMentre  <\/p>\n<p>    The mistreatment of Liu, and other human    rights proponents, is a stark reminder that while the Middle    Kingdom has made significant progress in liberalizing its    economy, it has yet to liberate the minds of the Chinese people    or its own political institutions.  <\/p>\n<p>    The tension between freedom and state power    threatens Chinas future. As former premier Wen Jiabao warned    in a speech in August 2010, Without the safeguard of political    reform, the fruits of economic reform would be lost. Later, in    an interview with CNN in October, he held that freedom of    speech is indispensable for any country.  <\/p>\n<p>    Article 33, Section 3, of the PRCs    Constitution holds that the State respects and protects human    rights. Such language, added by the National Peoples Congress    in 2004, encouraged liberals to test the waters, only to find    that the reality did not match the rhetoric.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Chinese Communist Party pays lip service    to a free market in ideas, noting: There can never be an end    to the need for the emancipation of individual thought    (China Daily, November 16, 2013). However, Party    doctrine strictly regulates that market. Consequently, under    market socialism with Chinese characteristics, there is bound    to be an ever-present tension between the individual and the    state.  <\/p>\n<p>    In an interview with the Wall Street    Journal (September 22, 2015), President Xi argued that    freedom is the purpose of order, and order the guarantee of    freedom. The real meaning of that statement is that Chinas    ruling elite will not tolerate dissent: individuals will be    free to communicate ideas, but only those consistent with the    states current interpretation of socialist    principles.  <\/p>\n<p>    This socialist vision contrasts sharply with    that of market liberalism, which holds that freedom is not the    purpose of order; it is the essential means to an emergent or    spontaneous order. In the terms of traditional Chinese Taoism,    freedom is the source of order. Simply put, voluntary exchange    based on the principle of freedom or nonintervention, which Lao    Tzu called wu wei, expands the range of choices open    to individuals.  <\/p>\n<p>    Denying Chinas 1.4 billion people a free    market in ideas has led to one of the lowest rankings in the    World Press Freedom Index, compiled by Reporters without    Borders. In the 2016 report, China ranked 176 out of 180    countries, only a few notches above North Koreaand the    situation appears to be getting worse. Under President Xi    Jinpings consolidation of power in preparation for this years    Party Congress, the websites of liberal think tanks, such as    the Unirule Institute, have been shut down, and virtual private    networks (VPNs) are being closed, preventing internet users    from circumventing the Great Firewall.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lius death is a tragic reminder that China    is still an authoritarian regime whose leaders seek to hold    onto power at the cost of the lives of those like Liu who seek    only peace and harmony through limiting the power of government    and safeguarding individual rights.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/blog\/liu-xiaobo-voice-freedom\" title=\"Liu Xiaobo: A Voice of Freedom - Cato Institute (blog)\">Liu Xiaobo: A Voice of Freedom - Cato Institute (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The death of Liu Xiaobo from liver cancer on July 13, under guard at a hospital in Shenyang, marks the passing of a great defender of freedoma man who was willing to speak truth to power. As the lead signatory to Charter 08, which called for the rule of law and constitutional government, Liu was sentenced to 11 years in prison for inciting the subversion of state power <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/liu-xiaobo-a-voice-of-freedom-cato-institute-blog\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187727],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206194"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206194"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206194\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}