{"id":205916,"date":"2017-07-17T03:45:33","date_gmt":"2017-07-17T07:45:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/study-indicates-75-of-human-genome-is-non-functional-technology-networks\/"},"modified":"2017-07-17T03:45:33","modified_gmt":"2017-07-17T07:45:33","slug":"study-indicates-75-of-human-genome-is-non-functional-technology-networks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/study-indicates-75-of-human-genome-is-non-functional-technology-networks\/","title":{"rendered":"Study Indicates 75% of Human Genome is Non-functional &#8211; Technology Networks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    An evolutionary biologist at the University of Houston has    published new calculations that indicate no more than 25    percent of the human genome is functional. That is in stark    contrast to suggestions by scientists with the ENCODE project    that as much as 80 percent of the genome is functional.  <\/p>\n<p>    In work published online in Genome Biology and Evolution, Dan    Graur reports the functional portion of the human genome    probably falls between 10 percent and 15 percent, with an upper    limit of 25 percent. The rest is so-called junk DNA, or useless    but harmless DNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    Graur, John and Rebecca Moores Professor of Biology and    Biochemistry at UH, took a deceptively simple approach to    determining how much of the genome is functional, using the    deleterious mutation rate  that is, the rate at which harmful    mutations occur  and the replacement fertility rate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Both genome size and the rate of deleterious mutations in    functional parts of the genome have previously been determined,    and historical data documents human population levels. With    that information, Graur developed a model to calculate the    decrease in reproductive success induced by harmful mutations,    known as the mutational load, in relation to the portion of    the genome that is functional.  <\/p>\n<p>    The functional portion of the genome is described as that which    has a selected-effect function, that is, a function that arose    through and is maintained by natural selection. Protein-coding    genes, RNA-specifying genes and DNA receptors are examples of    selected-effect functions. In his model, only functional    portions of the genome can be damaged by deleterious mutations;    mutations in nonfunctional portions are neutral since    functionless parts can be neither damaged nor improved.  <\/p>\n<p>    Because of deleterious mutations, each couple in each    generation must produce slightly more children than two to    maintain a constant population size. Over the past 200,000    years, replacement-level fertility rates have ranged from 2.1    to 3.0 children per couple, he said, noting that global    population remained remarkably stable until the beginning of    the 19th century, when decreased mortality in newborns resulted    in fertility rates exceeding replacement levels.  <\/p>\n<p>    If 80 percent of the genome were functional, unrealistically    high birth rates would be required to sustain the population    even if the deleterious mutation rate were at the low end of    estimates, Graur found.  <\/p>\n<p>    For 80 percent of the human genome to be functional, each    couple in the world would have to beget on average 15 children    and all but two would have to die or fail to reproduce, he    wrote. If we use the upper bound for the deleterious mutation    rate (2  108 mutations per nucleotide per generation), then     the number of children that each couple would have to have to    maintain a constant population size would exceed the number of    stars in the visible universe by ten orders of magnitude.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2012, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) announced    that 80 percent of the genome had a biochemical function. Graur    said this new study not only puts these claims to rest but    hopefully will help to refocus the science of human genomics.  <\/p>\n<p>    We need to know the functional fraction of the human genome in    order to focus biomedical research on the parts that can be    used to prevent and cure disease, he said. There is no need    to sequence everything under the sun. We need only to sequence    the sections we know are functional.  <\/p>\n<p>    This article has been republished frommaterialsprovided    by The University of Houston.    Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For    further information, please contact the cited source.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reference  <\/p>\n<p>    Graur, D. (2017). An upper limit on the functional fraction of    the human genome. Genome Biology and Evolution.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Here is the original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.technologynetworks.com\/tn\/news\/study-indicates-75-of-human-genome-is-non-functional-290414\" title=\"Study Indicates 75% of Human Genome is Non-functional - Technology Networks\">Study Indicates 75% of Human Genome is Non-functional - Technology Networks<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> An evolutionary biologist at the University of Houston has published new calculations that indicate no more than 25 percent of the human genome is functional. That is in stark contrast to suggestions by scientists with the ENCODE project that as much as 80 percent of the genome is functional. In work published online in Genome Biology and Evolution, Dan Graur reports the functional portion of the human genome probably falls between 10 percent and 15 percent, with an upper limit of 25 percent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/study-indicates-75-of-human-genome-is-non-functional-technology-networks\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-205916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205916"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205916\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}